Your face when you realize not much happened regarding digital IQ in the last 10 years.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D90 Camera Software Ver.1.00 Maximum Lens Aperture f/4.0 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 848 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 36 mm Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:11:01 03:14:44 Exposure Time 1/60 sec F-Number f/7.1 Exposure Program Aperture Priority ISO Speed Rating 400 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash Flash, Compulsory, Return Detected Focal Length 24.00 mm Comment (C)Philipp Lang Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 4288 Image Height 2848 Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Auto Scene Capture Type Landscape Gain Control Low Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown ISO Speed Used 400 Image Quality FINE White Balance AUTO Focus Mode AF-A Flash Setting NORMAL Auto Flash Mode Optional,TTL Flash Compensation 0.0 EV ISO Speed Requested 400 Flash Bracket Compensation 0.0 EV AE Bracket Compensation 0.0 EV Lens Type Nikon G Series Lens Range 16.0 - 85.0 mm; f/3.5 - f/5.6 Shooting/Bracketing Mode Single Frame/Off Noise Reduction OFF Camera Actuations 15197
>>3114125
>Indoors
>Aperture priority
>f/7.1
What could they mean by this?
>>3114128
>still misses focus
sage and commit suicide
>>3114128
They're using a flash. Still underexposed because of the white walls tho
not much has happened regarding op's IQ in the last 10 years either
>>3114125
thank fucking god. this made buying a new camera every 2-3 years more of a gearfag thing than an actual technical necessity
>>3114138
IQ is essentially a fixed, stable number once you leave childhood my man.
>>3114140
Is it okay to upgrade if I have a rabel?
>>3114141
>>3114140
>implying OP is older than 10 years
>>3114141
That explains why you continue spending everyday here learning almost nothing.
>>3114125
>we've gone from D700 to D810 in under 6 years
I don't quite agree with you there.
>>3114152
I'm here to teach, not to learn.
>>3114144
No it is not. Invariably when people think they need a camera upgrade what they really need is a lighting upgrade.
>>3114125
Better than film in the last few decades, or will have in the next few.
>>3114125
tfw the digital camera I have that I think looks the nicest is a 10 year old canon body