I am developing a image algorithm to desaturate and improve the

Mana Thanks in advance!

>>3114017
... so it's just selective colour where you saturate the selected colour?

>>3114017
It's already been done you 4th World fuckwit, and it's a shit idea anyway.

1/10

File: P1000826_06 TWO.jpg (394KB, 1330x1000px) Image search: [Google]

394KB, 1330x1000px

>>3114035
I guess no student group is allowed to make a car for their project then either because cars already exist?
And no AI is allowed to learn how to walk because that's been done already?

Get your head out of you faggot ass and appreciate technology or get back to the /fgt/ to whine about EBIL TECKNOLOJEE!

Here OP; take this

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Panasonic
Camera Model	DMC-G7
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.16
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2017:07:14 15:44:44
Exposure Time	1/400 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	400
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1330
Image Height	1000
Exposure Mode	Auto
Image Quality	Unknown
White Balance	Unknown
Focus Mode	Manual
Spot Mode	Unknown
Image Stabilizer	Off
Macro Mode	Normal
Shooting Mode	Aperture Priority
Audio	No
Flash Bias	0.00 EV

>>3114041
Dude, we're just shitposting in a bait thread.

Feel free to gives us your views on selective colouring though, I'd be delighted to throw a few ad homs your way.

>>3114044
>"I was just pretending to be a anti-technology retard"
Is that also the reason why you steer the thread away from algorithms and technology to your own personal artistic bullshit?

>>3114047
Are you trying to make amends for your sins in a past life or something?

Loving the whole fundamentalist overtone.

>>3114049
>"fundamentalist"
>coming from the guy opposing technology development because "technology is advanced enough"

Wow. Ever heard of a thing called mirror or are you afraid it will steal your soul?

>>3114041
>appreciate technology
appreciate people copying others without innovating in any way*

>>3114051
>opposing technology development because "technology is advanced enough"
a lot of people are like this, none of the major phone companies want to buy my smartphone that i made in my garage and i just cant figure out why?

>>3114051
I'm just amazed at your ability to interpret my posts in an entirely literal way.

Is this the thing they call autism?

>>3114052
Then stop using the rule of thirds, composition guidelines and colour contrasts

This entire "holy innovation" BS is driving me nuts, everyone needs to "innovate" all the fucking time, noone ever wants to improve somethign existing or just make a decent product well.

>>3114059
>everyone needs to "innovate" all the fucking time, noone ever wants to improve somethign existing
that's what innovating means, stupid
>or just make a decent product well
many people already did make op's product decently well, which is why there's really no point to making your own... especially to achieve something so played out. it would be like writing the code for your own software synth that specializes in 2011 dubstep bass wubs

>>3114017
>>3114018
>>3114019
>algorithm for selective colour
end yourself

>>3114062
STAWP HATING TECHNAWLUHGEE

>>3114066
your rihgt i should'nt be hindering improtant advancement like this