Can someone explain m43 to me? Who thought that putting a smaller

>>3113870
Right? And what is even more ridiculous is the sony rx100 series with its tiny sensor that is half the size of m43! And they're asking over a grand for that piece of shit! What kind of moron would buy that? :D

>>3113870
>>3113876
please be trolling

>6 of top 9 threads asking if m43 is a meme
Mods ban this fucking cunt

>>3113882
Stop bumping these threads

>>3113876
The smart choice is FF ILC + 1" superzoom

>>3113889
>mfw I own a m43 7 fast as fuck primes and 1 slow as fuck zoom

>>3113870
But the A9 is full frame.

>>3113909
you get up to 600mm eq. you retard?

>>3113870
you will never find out! have you considered killing yourself?

>>3113870
MFT cameras neither break your hands nor fry them.

>>3114126
I don't have a kid to shoot sports and I don't shoot birds because I am not a queer so my biggest is 150 mm eq, you faggot

>>3114165
>own m4/3
>not a queer
topkek

>>3113889
>The "small sensor results in bad IQ" argument only applies if I use it!
You are THIS retarded

>>3114168
The only point of a small sensor is a long zoom. 1" is the sweet spot of IQ + long zoom. m4/3 is the sweet spot of a homo's anus.

I understand the smaller sensor.

But why would anyone want to shoot at the pig disgusting 4:3 aspect ratio?

>>3114170
>m4/3 is the sweet spot of a homo's anus.
but mapplethorpe used medium format

M43 users suck cocks

>>3114187
>disgusting 4:3 aspect ratio
Academy ratio is best for movies. Composition is more interesting to me, and to paraphrase Fritz Lang, wider aspect ratios are only good for shooting snakes and funerals

regardless, you can crop afterwards

File: man-in-striped-shirt-choking.jpg (71KB, 761x800px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 761x800px

>>3114187
>unironically liking 3:2

File: 20161127-DSC05584.jpg (195KB, 2048x1152px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 2048x1152px

>>3114495
Yeah right! 16:9 give you that cinematic feel and a better reading of the picture. Also a better fit for viewing on computer and phone.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7M2
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.10 (Windows)
Photographer	David Mornet
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:15 08:06:36
Exposure Time	1/640 sec
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	400
Brightness	1.9 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>3114570
21:9 so asians can see all of it

>>3115560
You can check "35/50" on flickr.

>>3115560
well 2.35:1 is the patrician widescreen movie aspect ratio. is that why Asian kino is best?

File: 07_mamiya645_1.jpg (26KB, 500x367px) Image search: [Google]

26KB, 500x367px

>>3114187
>But why would anyone want to shoot at the pig disgusting 4:3 aspect ratio?

You do realize that the vast majority of patrician film formats are closer to 4:3 than to 3:2, right?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Google
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	500
Image Height	367

File: 2017071642.jpg (654KB, 1440x1080px) Image search: [Google]

654KB, 1440x1080px

Shoot M4/3 they said, it's just as good as FF they said.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	OLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.
Camera Model	E-M10
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.18
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Color Filter Array Pattern	1320
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:16 20:41:11
White Point Chromaticity	0.3
Exposure Time	1/500 sec
F-Number	f/11.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	200
Exposure Bias	-0.3 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Auto
Focal Length	19.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1440
Image Height	1080
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	Low Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>3115968
>just as good as FF they said.
no one says this, not even m43 shooters

but m43 just as good as APS-C on the other hand...

File: 2017071631.jpg (520KB, 960x1280px) Image search: [Google]

520KB, 960x1280px

>>3116011
If APS-C too gets these noisy shadows and clipped gradients, it raises the question as to why anyone shoots anything other than FF besides being poor.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	OLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.
Camera Model	E-M10
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.18
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Color Filter Array Pattern	1320
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:16 20:36:51
White Point Chromaticity	0.3
Exposure Time	1/500 sec
F-Number	f/9.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	200
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Auto
Focal Length	19.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	960
Image Height	1280
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	Low Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>3115968
>>3116405
only pixel peeping autists give a fuck. everyone else sees a decent photo

>>3116405
the slightly blotchy sky gradient is a limitation of 8-bit JPEG, I can do that on FF too

don't see any shadows, noisy or otherwise

File: 6037253eb25771fc55fd047da5a890de.png (815KB, 600x946px) Image search: [Google]

815KB, 600x946px

>>3115951
>patrician film formats
>4:3

You've got the wrong film format

>>3117200
What's that camera

>>3117223
lurk moar

>>3117223
Hasselblad 500cm

>>3113870
There are a lot of girls and beta males who are scared of big manly sensors.

>>3117223
oh dear

it's literally the camera that went to the moon you moron

I like my m43

>>3113870
>Can someone explain m43 to me?
Makes more sense than putting a full frame sensor in a toy camera