How to get this "granular" or analogic effect? According

File: 35396644481_e3af269947_o.jpg (2MB, 1840x1232px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1840x1232px

Another pic.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SLP1000SE
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:06:26 01:20:12
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 28440134881_19baed2474_o.jpg (1MB, 1840x1232px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1840x1232px

Last one.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SLP1000SE
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2016:07:25 01:54:00
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>3113735
Fujifilm SLP1000SE is a Fuji minilab scanner

so these were shot on film. It's not an effect, it's just what film looks like

so shoot film or use VSCO if you can't hack shooting film for real

>>3113746
Or use dxo filmpack

File: DSC02248.jpg (1MB, 5150x3433px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 5150x3433px

>>3113735

VSCO can add some grain, but it isn't the same.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7M2
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.9 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	70 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:03:30 21:37:50
Exposure Time	1/80 sec
F-Number	f/16.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/16.0
Brightness	6.7 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	70.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>3113746
Wow, I must sound stupid right now (I am a noob, anyway). So... I need a film camera to get this. Is it economically viable anymore?

>>3113844
>>3113845
Thanks!

>>3113951
sure, you can pick up a film body for maybe 20-30$ with a lens and a roll of film is going to be around 4$ for the cheapest kind (depending on where you live). After that you need to let it developed and scanned (shouldn't be more than a couple of bucks as well)

>>3113981
>(shouldn't be more than a couple of bucks as well)
I wish. Depending on the local availability of labs, a simple develop + scans can go from 2 to 12 bucks easily.

Bump for granulated pictures.

>>3113981
> (shouldn't be more than a couple of bucks as well)
Stop misinforming people.

>>3114845
?

>>3114848
I think they mean that developing can be expensive depending on where you live.

>>3113951

Films having a bit of a renaissance at the moment, so it's fairly available assuming you don't live in the middle of nowhere.

A roll will cost anywhere from $4-18. There's a decent selection of film under $10.

Developing and scanning is anywhere from $7-16 depending on what your lab charges. Try to avoid wallgreens, walmart, etc. Try and find a local camera shop that does processing.

Shooting film is no different than digital in terms of how it works.

>>3114952
$10 per roll + $10 to develop / 36 frames = $0.56 per shot.

A Nikon D750 is $1400. The shutter lasts about 150,000 shots. If you're willing to live with getting your grain from software, digital is the better deal.

I shoot both, and vastly prefer film.