Is bokeh a meme? This picture is good and wasn't taken

This is just a snapshit m8.

>>3112336
Literally the only rule of photography is, don't take a boring picture.

If you have an interesting subject you can put film up your asshole and use your anus as an aperture and people will think it is a good photo.

>>3112338
Shhhh if the secret gets out, there won't be any more trash /p/ threads

>>3112337
It can't be a snapshit if it's film

>>3112338
Why didn't feminist start to take picture with their vaginas yet?

>>3112342
Women's art is about secretions, not apertures. You should know this, comma, space, chauvinist pig.

>>3112336
there is a visible separation of the background due to shallower depth of field

so not exactly bokeh but a lite demo version of bokeh

>>3112338
>>3112342
Whats the minimal flange distance for a pinhole camera to focus on infinity? Is it possible to make a vagina camera`?

>>3112344
>Implying a bloody cervix isn't just an f135 aperture

>>3112336
The photo is grainy blurshit.

Even if the moment and framing is okay this actually does make the image much worse for most audiences outside of instagram or such.

>>3112459
>I think resolution is the only important part of an image

>>3112524
Too much of a snapshot imo. Good subject maybe but bad execution all around.

>>3112344

>secretions

inb4 someone figures out a way to use period blood while developing film

>>3112546
>in b4 the screencap of the lomography girl that soaked film in piss

>>3112524
Of course not. It's one of *many* features that are required to make an image good.

Technical features like sharpness and actual resolution / image quality are still required criteria for an image to be good. The whole world is shooting images - having only memetic instagram snapshit resolution just isn't "good" at this point.

>>3112336
>foot too close to frame edge
>bouquet cut off awkwardly
>looks like she's wearing a flip up microphone
>bright orange/pink skin
>car intersecting subject
>would this image hold any weight without nostalgia
>the background is unimportant and in places distracting to the main image, good use of bokeh would have prevented this.

Picture is only "good" because it has a highly impregnatible female in it.

>>3112366
kek

>>3112336
god-tier torso
find girls like this and it doesn't really matter what lens you use

gearfags btfo

>>3112609
go back to /pol/

>>3112927
Y'know, he's not wrong

>>3112336
>This picture is good
[citation_needed]

>>3112336
Those legs aren't a meme, that's for sure. A sad realisation; those legs are very old now. Really makes you think about how temporary youthful beauty is and how fast the time goes

>>3112365
No she'd have to be a virgin, but she wouldn't be after you violently insert a piece of LF film in her vagina, so it's a paradox

Can you get banned for making the same low-effort shitpost thread over and over and spamming the board?