Thread replies: 9
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: IMG_0085.jpg (126KB, 600x446px) Image search:
[Google]
126KB, 600x446px
is 12MP enough by today's standards? the a7s/d700 are incredible camera and acceptably modern but some clients want +16MP. However i could just upscale it in photoshop, how acceptable would that be in terms of quality?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 600 Image Height 446 Scene Capture Type Standard
>>
>using cameras with quality on par with iPhones
pottery
>>
If your client wants 16MP, get a camera that can shoot 16MP, simple as that.
>>
>>3111151
Obviously if your client wants more resolution, you use a higher resolution camera with a matching lens.
For me personally, it's not only having the option for a high resolution image. I also simply crop so often that I very much *want* sharp glass and well over 12MP on the sensor.
>>
>>3111151
>but some clients want +16MP.
Then tell them it's 16MP. Actually, tell them it's 96MP. Like anyone can tell the fucking difference
>>
>>3111151
Why photographers are so fucking beta/ugly?
>>
>>3111172
bc photography by nature is voyeuristic and non-participative, and people with those tendencies are generally beta and/or ugly
>>
what do they need those extra 4mp for? are they making large prints or cropping a shit ton?
>>
>>3111167
only viable reply on this thread
Thread posts: 9
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1