Is this a good photo? I don't really know much about photagraphy,

File: WP_20170630_16_53_19_Rich.jpg (2MB, 5341x2327px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 5341x2327px

And how about this?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Windows Photo Editor 10.0.10011.16384
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	96 dpi
Vertical Resolution	96 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:01 11:32:15
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>3109182
i think this one would be better from higher up to get above the trees in the foreground, also maybe with a bit of the sky cropped since it's just flat blue without anything really going on

Neither are great photos, but are perfectly acceptable as snapshots to show your friends and family. Look into using the rule of thirds and other photo composition techniques.

I like how the branch arches over and the fence directs the viewers' eye on the first photo, but apart from the row of trees there isn't much to be directed to.

The second photo is clearly a pretty location but doesn't give much insight past that. The photo is a little bit wide for my tastes personally too and could do with some cropping. If the horizon of the water was slightly higher it might be more visually appealing. For curiosity's sake, where was it taken?

File: IMG_112.jpg (1MB, 2698x1799px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2698x1799px

>>3109186
How about this?

>>3109189
And what's the rule of thirds?

File: some guy's photo.jpg (2MB, 2218x1523px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2218x1523px

>>3109189
could use a tighter crop, fucked around with some other processing too
>>3109191
don't be too lazy to google things

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:07 13:03:54
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2218
Image Height	1523

>>3109189
if cropped like
>>3109233
it looks pretty good. symmetry is nice. could have benefited from being taken square on with the buildings tho.