ITT: DOUBLE EXPOSURES What do you guys think about double exposure

File: IMG_1001.jpg (2MB, 3024x4032px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3024x4032px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Apple
Camera Model	iPhone 7
Camera Software	Snapseed 2.17.150426759
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:07 20:07:56
Exposure Time	1/50 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	32
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Brightness	4.7 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	3.99 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3024
Image Height	4032
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: IMG_0718.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Apple
Camera Model	iPhone 7
Camera Software	10.1.1
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:01:01 15:55:06
Exposure Time	1/1520 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	20
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Brightness	10.0 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	3.99 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	4032
Image Height	3024
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3108824
>What do you guys think about double exposure imagery
Dumb meme that lost any sort of merit once digital came along due to the fact that it was somewhat difficult to make anything passably interesting on film.

>>3108875
>this guy

guess your wife left you for a filmChad?

>>3108880
>he fell for the ebin 2 shitty snapshits combined to make a new, extra shit photo meme

File: 64440011.jpg (1MB, 1545x1024px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1545x1024px

It's usually not that interesting. Tried it once but messed up and accidentally did a triple or quadruple exposure and it's a jumbled mess.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	QSS-32_33
Camera Software	QSS-32_33 8.01.001 2008.01.15
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1545
Image Height	1024

>>3108824
It can be incredibly effective when done well, but this is not the case for the vast majority of examples.

File: 30073968716_4dea2346c2_b.jpg (178KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

178KB, 1024x683px

>>3108824
>>3108825
>>3108827
That's not a double exposure. You just put one image on top of another and played with the transparency.

>>3109074
i like this one

>>3109074
... erm Snapseed called it double exposure.

Btw that's a cool photo

File: D71_3486.jpg (2MB, 1920x1280px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1280px

>>3108824
This is a real double exposure, not done in layers. This one is in camera through the view finder, you can get some really nice images without fidgeting with multiple images but you have to practice and know your compositions for each shot...I have hundreds of doubles and Iove them as each one is unique

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D7100
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows)
Photographer	Damian Walker
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	902
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	105 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:03:22 14:04:41
Exposure Time	1/100 sec
F-Number	f/7.1
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/7.1
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Flash
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	105.00 mm
Comment	Damian Walker Photography
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>3109074
I feel like this would have worked better in digital like the op image rather then true double exposure

v surreal

>>3109864
>>3109864
Not sure what you mean by Digital, but if its the camera type, then it is a digital camera, Nikon D7100

>>3108824
> What do you guys think about double exposure imagery
Pointless in virtually all instances.

If you must massively alter an image, draw something interesting on it, or copy paste objects into it for some or another artistic or meem effect.

File: 07290-004.jpg (721KB, 1000x991px) Image search: [Google]

721KB, 1000x991px

fun with lines downtown

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	paint.net 4.0.16
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi

>>3109866
I meant made in photoshop or on a computer rather than in-camera
gives you more freedom and control