Velvia Thread: Is there a Camera that can do this natively

The incredible ignorance of your post is flooring.

File: 1499171905947.jpg (1MB, 1004x1500px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1004x1500px

>>3108724

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi

>>3108724
Horseman 8x10

obligatory reminder that provia is 10x better than velvia

>>3108826
and ektar reigns supreme

File: Velvia50_018.jpg (419KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

419KB, 1000x667px

>>3108826
Sometimes

>>3108836
The only positive about ektar is its c41. If you can get e6 deved reasonably easily/cheaply yet still shoot ektar...yer dumb.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	6000
Image Height	4000
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:06:19 18:57:19
Exposure Time	1.6 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Brightness	-6.5 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Daylight Fluorescent
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	667
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>3108923
>the only positive about ektar is that it has 4-5 more stops of dynamic range and a much, much larger exposure latitude than any E6 film

Fixed. Ektar has saturated, high contrast colours AND a high dynamic range = best of both worlds.

>>3108724
Sad thing is that digital can't even look like this after editing.

>>3109020
hi
i shoot exclusively film
yes it can
you're dumb
thanks

>>3108724

You mean gice everything an unnatural blue tint?

File: Velvia100F_016.jpg (517KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

517KB, 1000x667px

>>3108930
Touché anon, touché.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	6000
Image Height	4000
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:22 21:42:50
Exposure Time	1.6 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Brightness	-7.1 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1000
Image Height	667
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>3109020
Yes it can, just like how you can make film look like digital.

>>3108739
lmao someone reposted my snapshit

god bless

File: 62380007.jpg (843KB, 2369x1933px) Image search: [Google]

843KB, 2369x1933px

>>3108724
>Be on vacation
>Bring 6x7 camera and muh velvia for sunrises
>Forget ND filters and polarizers
>Try anyway
>Blown highlights

WASTE OF MONEY

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.10.1 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:07 09:19:02
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>3109115
Shoulda just exposed for the sunset you little tryhard twink

would've got a more usable image than this

>>3109090
>>3109094
>yes it can

Prove it.

>>3109118
You're absolutely right on all 3 accounts

File: duChemin-SinghRay-3-440x293.jpg (30KB, 440x293px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 440x293px

>>3108724
sure ... use a Blue Yellow Polarizer just like the film shot was done

>>3108923
>The only positive about ektar is its c41
But C41 is negative, anon