Why the fuck aren't you doubling your film by using

>>3105414
are there any good ones?

doubling film is a comfy feel and you get a neg strip with almost 80 photos p good huh.

why not half it and shoot panoramic

File: 1494048512342.png (86KB, 337x441px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 337x441px

Do they make 6x3.5 medium format cameras so you get the panoramic look but with more film?

>>3105428
theres always 35mm film adapters for 6x6 and 6x7 cameras.

>>3105416
Pen - F

>>3105414

36 isn't enough for you?

It is not like it is hard to change film rolls either.

A pen f comes with a 38mm lens. What is that lens with the crop factor?

>>3105428
>acquire holga
>make 6x3.5 mask
>profit
>extra: hack a good lens onto it

>>3105445
2x
half frame is literally half of a 135 frame

micro four thirds is digital version of half frame format

>>3105455
Half frame is bigger than micro 43

File: IMG_2058.jpg (500KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]

500KB, 1000x750px

>>3105428
They make adapters, or you can make your own easily enough

>>3105416
Yashica samurai
Konica aa35

>>3105428
Bronica 645 had a falsie pano back. It took 35mm film but it didn't do anything you couldn't do by merely cropping a 645 frame into a pano shape

Yes lets make the negative even smaller! It's not like 35mm is useable anyway am I right guys?

>>3105445
you could have googled that faster than writing that post. 55mm equiv.
>>3105455
It's not, look it upand stop perpetuating this misconception. APS-C has the same image size as half frame. M43 is closer to the 110 format. half frame has a 1.5x crop factor, ish, m43 2x.

File: 19688865922_401052c7c6_o.jpg (998KB, 1716x1249px) Image search: [Google]

998KB, 1716x1249px

>>3105496
Can you tell what format this was taken on, oh film expert?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Nikon
Camera Model	Nikon COOLSCAN V ED
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS2 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1814
Image Height	1249
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	4000 dpi
Vertical Resolution	4000 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2015:07:14 21:43:27
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1716
Image Height	1249

File: 0738_s.jpg (127KB, 1000x600px) Image search: [Google]

127KB, 1000x600px

>>3105435
Just stuff some 135 in old 120 roll. (Myself tried it only once, but maybe its your thing.)

>>3105496

35mm is totally usable and outperforms most DSLRs made today.

That is unusable?

>>3105524
Not that anon, but I think I remember that picture being taken with some Minox subminiature on (DIY) 8x11mm Adox CMS 20. Really impressive stuff.

Adox CMS 20 isn't a very realistic use case though. Barely anyone is going to use an effective ISO 12 (or less) film on a regular basis unless they live on the sun AND they'd have to develop it themselves since I don't know any photo labs dev'ing with Adotech.
A look at a more mainstream slide film like Velvia 50 in half-frame format would be more useful I think.

>>3105547
have you seen some of the garbage scans people get? worse than a phone camera from 2008

400-500 dollar investment in scanning technology is a minimum for film if you're not letting your lab scan it for you

>>3105455
M43 is literally a quarter of a 135 frame, it's half frames, half frame, hence why it's all unusable trash.

Have a Canon Demi EE17 on it's way. :D

>>3105552
That film is hell, don't even try to use it on a handheld camera when in the shadow. tripod all the way. I used it on my Hasselblad, I develop it in pota with incredible results, adotech is a legalized robbery. I had sometimes to use it in really dark churches for some work, I was shooting at 1EV and that means 10 to 20 seconds of exposure time (reciprocity error included) to gain some depth of field. In bright days it's the best you can ask for, if you can handle your camera still at 1/15. Details details details.

Because film scanning benefits from a larger medium. Even the hi-fi option (Oly half-frame SLR?) is made low-fi by how much flatbeds etc. aren't where they fucking ought to be in this day and age.

File: 6681517251_a2c3360310_b.jpg (204KB, 1024x651px) Image search: [Google]

204KB, 1024x651px

35mm is already very small. So going even smaller sounds like madness. I only use 35mm film with a compact camera. For proper photographs I use medium and large format.

File: 15845256174_d842129419_o.jpg (940KB, 1795x1294px) Image search: [Google]

940KB, 1795x1294px

>>3105552
Here's his minox velvia 50.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Nikon
Camera Model	Nikon COOLSCAN V ED
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS2 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	1795
Image Height	1294
Number of Bits Per Component	16, 16, 16
Compression Scheme	Uncompressed
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	4000 dpi
Vertical Resolution	4000 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2015:02:08 02:01:35
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1795
Image Height	1294

>>3105428
There's always the Hasselblad Xpan. About 20 - 21 shots out of a single roll of 35mm. It's negatives are 24x65 though

>>3105612
And it's completely useless.

>>3105414
I do, I have a Bronica ETRS

>>3105414
I am,

sold my m3 and now use pen-f

File: IMG_20170709_010843_740.jpg (356KB, 1065x1065px) Image search: [Google]

356KB, 1065x1065px

>>3105560
Bumping cause I got it. Can't wait to give it a test spin!

>>3109838
lookin smoking hot.

>>3109838
Is there another version of this that does full-frame? I love the way this looks, but don't know much about developing for that.

File: ScanImage005.jpg (2MB, 3442x2154px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3442x2154px

Pen-D, leaks a bit, superia 400

>>3109926
>Is there another version of this that does full-frame?
nope, that shape cant be found on any other canon camera. what you mean developing for that? its the same dev as with any 35mm roll.

>>3105414
cause im using full frame

File: VIEJO II 1000PX.jpg (658KB, 787x1058px) Image search: [Google]

658KB, 787x1058px

fujica+hp5@800 iirc

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	3199 dpi
Vertical Resolution	3199 dpi
Image Created	2017:07:08 16:32:05
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	787
Image Height	1058

>>3105543
Neat

>>3105414
Tell me what half frame camera to buy

I shoot micro 4/3 and 645 (the half frame of mf) so I already am

>>3110216
Lol

>>3109950
>what you mean developing for that? its the same dev as with any 35mm roll.
I literally know nothing about photography, I assumed it might be different

>>3110323
its a 35mm roll, but the window on which light passes through is smaller by half to a normal 35mm camera, so you get smaller negatives, hence double the photos.

>>3110325
ah I see, interesting.
Is there a difference in quality, with it being smaller?

>>3110344
yeah, qualitatively they are different: bigger grain, cruder tonal gradations, less sharp, lenses are unable to do a pronounced wide angle (far it can go is a pseudo 35mm focal length).

>>3105414
I already am, It's called aps-c and it is digital so much better than film in every aspect.

File: balloon.jpg (760KB, 756x1024px) Image search: [Google]

760KB, 756x1024px

i carry a Demi for my kick-around camera.
but in general, i like to make decent size enlargements, so usually just use the Demi for snap-shits.
every now and then i get something unexpectedly good.
pic related.
6x7 masterace

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Photos 1.0.1
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:03:25 11:49:00
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	756
Image Height	1024

>>3110602
Are you going to post any?

>>3110610
only demi pic i have digital :-(