I've a trip planned to Romania and I'm trying to decide

Obviously 20 and 50, other than that take the 135 or 180 if you can.

>>3103790
>what combo would you take, and why?
24-70 + 70-200
Primes are inefficient travel companions

>>3103791
This pretty much

>>3103791
>>3103830
why no love for the 85?

>>3103830
A 3 prime setup is best for travel. A widy, a middy and a telly.

A good prime setup is a set of lenses times their focal length by 2. Eg. 24mm, 24 x 2 is around 50, 50mm, 50 x 2 is 100, 100mm.

OP's set up is limiting. 20mm being his only wide he definitely needs to bring it, the 50mm being the next in line he definitely needs to bring it, the next in line would be the 100mm which I think he should bring as opposed to the 85, 135, and 180.

That said, I would prefer bring 85 than 135 if OP doesn't wanna bring 100.

fuck im a retard
>>3103836
this was meant for >>3103833

File: 20160811-DSC02053.jpg (411KB, 2048x1152px) Image search: [Google]

411KB, 2048x1152px

>>3103790
A 28mm f/2.8 & a 50mm f/1.4. Do panorama or crop if you feel like you're stuck with your focal length.
A 35mm is great for handheld night shots in the streets.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7M2
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.10 (Windows)
Photographer	david mornet
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	40 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:06:28 13:49:26
Exposure Time	1/160 sec
F-Number	f/6.3
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/6.3
Brightness	8.8 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	40.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

I dont undestand those people that carry three lenses with them when they travel. A 35mm fix is all you need

>>3103843
I'm super tempted to bring just the 20 and the 85 and be done with it, but I'm afraid to miss the 50 and the long range

>>3103790
I took an A7II and a GR to Europe and I ended up just leaving the Sony in the hotel room because I got so tired of walking around with it.

Keep your kit light.

Ok, I would take the 20mm1.8, 50mm1.8 and the 180mm2.8. why? other lens like 85, 100 and 135 are in the between of tele and wide-angle lenses. If you want to take some portrait of people from Romania, I would bring the 85mm1.8, but as far it isn't your main concern, the 50mm1.8 is better because you can use it for other purposes besides portraits or candids.

File: 67843824.jpg (3MB, 4704x3480px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4704x3480px

I'm traveling to London on November and I was thinking on taking the a 28-70 and a 50 1.4 only.

I was also thinking on taking a 24 2.8 but I'm not sure yet.

Any advice on my case?

>>3103936
why do you want a 50 if you've got a 28-70. Take something you don't have covered like a 70-200

20 and 85. You can do the same with an 85 as you can with a 50, and telephoto lenses are pointless anyway.

>>3103939
I was thinking on it because of the aperture, not because of the focal length

>>3103875
yeah, I'll be staying with friends so I want to be ready for portraits (chicks are super hot in there). I might consider the 20+50+85 and put the 135 in a pocket or something.

>>3103945
> and telephoto lenses are pointless anyway.
elaborate

>>3103790
sell everything and buy 24-70 f/2.8 and 70-200 f/2.8

doesn't matter. your photos are going to suck regardless.

>>3103959
THIS
Carrying a load of primes for travel is retarded. It's the bag lady equivalent of gear faggotry.

>>3103964
haha, asshole

>>3104036
>walking around with a FF DSLR and a giant tele zoom
>being this much of a tourist

>>3103936
Took a 24 and a 50 to London, didn't miss anything. Just make sure your stuff is kinda weather proof, because London.

>>3103836
>A widy, a middy and a telly.
Are you fucking 80 years old?

File: .jpg (368KB, 800x528px) Image search: [Google]

368KB, 800x528px

>>3104537
>carry three primes
>be a stuck up hipster
And in case you didn't know that the prime is also giant and looks like a tourist-zoom to anyone else.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 30D
Lens Size	17.00 - 50.00 mm
Firmware Version	Firmware 1.0.6
Owner Name	unknown
Serial Number	1230915492
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2014:06:06 13:32:17
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	250
Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Exposure Bias	-1/3 EV
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	30.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	800
Image Height	528
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Mode	Av-Priority
Focus Type	Auto
Metering Mode	Evaluative
Sharpness	Unknown
Saturation	High
Contrast	Normal
Shooting Mode	Manual
Image Size	Large
Focus Mode	AI Servo
Drive Mode	Single
Flash Mode	Off
Compression Setting	Fine
Macro Mode	Normal
Flash Bias	-0.38 EV
White Balance	Auto
Exposure Compensation	2
Sensor ISO Speed	204
Camera Actuations	1279524896
Color Matrix	33

>>3103826
28-300 and nothing else

>>3104733
>carrying a 180mm while on vacation
>still playing the obvious tourist

>>3105304
>worrying about what other people think

>>3103957
an 85 captures pretty much all you need, if you need to, you can move closer. :p

>>3103826
>primes are inefficient travel companions
cool, good to know you cant take photos