>take a photo
>it looks perfect on the camera screen
>can't make it look as anywhere near as good in Lightroom
>calculate exposure, depth of field, focus and contrast
>take the photo
>you can't see what you did but you know it'll be good
>it's actually good
That's analog, right?
>>3096069
>calculate exposure, depth of field, focus and contrast
>the photo op passes and is lost forever
what do you do when you need to be ready in a moment's notice?
>>3096064
Downsize it to the camera screen's size. Or, you know, get a good body & a good prime so your images don't look shit when larger.
>>3096111
Aperture or Shutter priority, ya dingus.
>>3096111
>he thinks good photogs are reactive critters
lol?
did you know Vivian Maier used to kick kids in the ankle or call them ugly bastards and then took their pictures while they were crying? always be ahead. dont be a "hunter", be a creator.
>>3096132
>all great photographs are the result of being an aggressive dick
>>3096164
yes.
>>3096164
all great art is made by assholes
>>3096164
desu you have to be pretty aggressive, maybe even in a nice way though. One of the most famous photos was staged, that one of the lovers kissing in paris, a few were really.
>>3096234
>maybe even in a nice way though
this is right. some of the "nice" assholes is martin parr, he goes in front of you flashes the shit out of your face while you try to eat a hot dog and he tells you in his uber english accent "OW UR SUCH A LOUVLY LAYDAY I JUST HAD TO TAKE THAT PHOWROW", when in fact he photographed you because youre the gaudiest looking human in his area.
>>3096069
>calculate contrast
>implying you can change a scenes contrast when you take the shot
Why are people here so dumb?
>>3096261
>implying you cant alter contrast with your film camera settings
look at him and laugh.