reminder that youtubers have a big part in the death of /p/.

>>3094273
This

>>3094273
>were lucky to have isi, sugar, catsby and NG

nice one, gonna get a lot of (you)s, here's mine

>>3094273
Fuck off theo,
Stay mad that jl showed you up tho.

>>3094279
op don't get (you) anon

>>3094277
>>3094283
i appreciate the bump

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1241
Image Height	966
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: IMG_0505.jpg (54KB, 1241x361px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 1241x361px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Width	1241
Image Height	361
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3094273
He fell into JL's trap. the 32-64 is sloooooow even for MF.

>>3094324
not the point of this thread anon

Whenever I posted some pics I rarely got more than 1-2 posts with feedback or even someone else joining in to get a discussion going, so there's very little motivation for that kind of thing

>>3094334
yea that's what needs to change anon, don't come to /p/ solely for critiques either, come with the intend of sharing your photos, keep posting anon

the two of the most shitbag you tubers joining together in a complete cringeworthy piece of total shit.

If it was Fro-knows vs Matt Grange, the video was going to be worth to watch and the photos would be good.

>>3094375
but they're both shit anon

>>3094273
>implying most /p/ros watch photo youtubers or even know who they are

>>3094498
that wasn't implied anywhere, rainman

>>3094499
he means /p/ in general, not just good /p/eople, forrest gump

File: IMG_0509.jpg (150KB, 1100x209px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 1100x209px

>>3094501
Fine, but they all do, it's obvious with the youtube and gear-related threads. ATleast youtube is where it mostly started, then reddit and the general retarded millennials

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	762 dpi
Vertical Resolution	762 dpi
Image Created	2017:01:26 18:57:54
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1100
Image Height	209
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3094273
You must be new to /p/.
>>3094505
>>3094501
>>3094499
Are you the anon who has weaponized his autism doing your reviews of softcore porn pictures by reading too much into them?

>>3094273
What a mess this was. Jason overcooked his photos and Ken doesn't know how to cook them period.

who is isi?

>>3094505
>people think far too much about techniques and not enough about seeing

Who is "people" and what does "seeing" even mean? I know a lot of folks who take decently composed photos of interesting things only to fucking ruin it with post processing. Or they just ignore the light and how it works/don't put effort into getting better light and instead opt to just "get the shot". This is like those people who say working out is stupid and you should only study - they are not mutually exclusive.

I would argue technique is as important as seeing. You're not going to be the best you can if you make a meme about only focusing on one thing and ignoring another. Learning better technique can only help you.

>>3094273
Not to be rude here, but photogearfaggotry goes waaay back, decades before the interwebs ever even existed. Confirmation bias, insecurity, group think and xenofobia are not new things by any means. It's basically same with every other part of life, interests and tech.

>>3095568
not the point anon, this is about /p/. It existed on /p/ but less than a fraction of what it is now, even then, ironically.

>>3095501
one of the only remaining photographers on /p/

>>3094273
please stop projecting

>>3095545
you're an idiot

>>3095690
projecting what anon, and that how so?