File: FOTO4145.jpg (416KB, 1050x715px) Image search: [Google]

416KB, 1050x715px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO4136.jpg (474KB, 1050x717px) Image search: [Google]

474KB, 1050x717px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO4370.jpg (524KB, 1050x715px) Image search: [Google]

524KB, 1050x715px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO4409.jpg (397KB, 1050x717px) Image search: [Google]

397KB, 1050x717px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO4422.jpg (421KB, 1050x717px) Image search: [Google]

421KB, 1050x717px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO4616.jpg (547KB, 1050x717px)

547KB, 1050x717px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO4618.jpg (544KB, 1050x717px)

544KB, 1050x717px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO4632.jpg (591KB, 1050x717px)

591KB, 1050x717px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO4615.jpg (554KB, 1050x717px) Image search: [Google]

554KB, 1050x717px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO4658.jpg (513KB, 1050x717px)

513KB, 1050x717px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO4667.jpg (516KB, 1050x717px) Image search: [Google]

516KB, 1050x717px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO4635_merg.jpg (505KB, 1050x717px) Image search: [Google]

505KB, 1050x717px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO4637.jpg (400KB, 1050x717px) Image search: [Google]

400KB, 1050x717px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO4406.jpg (328KB, 1050x717px) Image search: [Google]

328KB, 1050x717px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO4128.jpg (487KB, 1050x717px) Image search: [Google]

487KB, 1050x717px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO4192.jpg (295KB, 1050x717px) Image search: [Google]

295KB, 1050x717px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO4468.jpg (319KB, 1050x717px)

319KB, 1050x717px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO4575.jpg (578KB, 1050x715px)

578KB, 1050x715px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO4469.jpg (539KB, 1050x717px) Image search: [Google]

539KB, 1050x717px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO4476_merg.jpg (425KB, 1050x717px) Image search: [Google]

425KB, 1050x717px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO4489_merg.jpg (590KB, 1050x717px) Image search: [Google]

590KB, 1050x717px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO4512.jpg (319KB, 1050x717px) Image search: [Google]

319KB, 1050x717px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO4203.jpg (384KB, 1050x715px) Image search: [Google]

384KB, 1050x715px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO4083.jpg (665KB, 1050x717px) Image search: [Google]

665KB, 1050x717px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO4089.jpg (721KB, 1050x717px) Image search: [Google]

721KB, 1050x717px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO4091.jpg (642KB, 717x1050px) Image search: [Google]

642KB, 717x1050px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO4094.jpg (760KB, 1050x717px) Image search: [Google]

760KB, 1050x717px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO4109.jpg (455KB, 1050x717px) Image search: [Google]

455KB, 1050x717px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO4104.jpg (603KB, 1050x717px) Image search: [Google]

603KB, 1050x717px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO4720_merg.jpg (324KB, 717x1050px) Image search: [Google]

324KB, 717x1050px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

nice captures, moopco!

Nothing of particular interest in here that I saw.

Maybe some of these as part of a series on abandoned buildings would work but most of this is just stuff you see while driving down a country road near Sugar's house.

>>3086502
Photography isn't the hobby for you

>>3086504
What does that even mean, anon?

I didn't like isi's latest photos so now I'm not allowed to like photography?

>>3086541
youre literally hitler now.

>>3086504

Maybe a hick's day out isn't for any of us.

>>3086495
>>3086306
>>3086285
>>3086274
really cool

>>3086541
She's implying that these photos are 3deep3u
They're not, but you're still a bleb

There is no engagement in these photos, they are very poorly thought out snapshots and your processing is all over the place yet never good/pleasing. There also seems to be a lot of noise in your photos.

Have you looked at local colleges to see if they run night school classes so you can learn the basics a little better? An intro book may also help, but I think hands on learning is much better for photography.

Keep shooting though, it's a long journey from being a beginner like yourself to being a really good photographer, many people underestimate how hard it can be.

>>3086725
>your processing is all over the place
Idiot

>>3086747
>hurr durr muh jpgs
Just because you shoot jpgs to try to avoid taking responsibility for your poor post processing choices doesn't mean you can't shoot stuff consistently

>>3086749
But these are consistent. You're just not literate.

>>3086819
l o l
o
l

>>3086826
>two are black and white, therefore its not consistent, HAH

>>3086958
Just give it a rest isi you fucking twat. Start spending the time you set aside for bickering and defending your shit pictures, on thinking about your photography.

>>3086976
getting desperate now huh

File: 1d1.jpg (58KB, 700x479px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 700x479px

all shit without exception

>tfw you're not even Sugar-tier

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5.1 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2013:04:03 19:37:27
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	700
Image Height	479

File: FaceApp_1496110051876.jpg (246KB, 1280x1280px) Image search: [Google]

246KB, 1280x1280px

>>3086988
Kill yourself Jessie

>>3086289
linden nj?

>>3086988
Meh, c'mon shug... not the best but still it's interesting. I like looking at Alabami.

I posted a photo on /pol/ and some fucker/anon lives 50 yards from me lol.

I like your posts į̴ṡ̵̩i̵̭̇ .

>>3086495
This one is okay, probably the best of the set due to odd proportions but dead on front facing photos of odd buildings have been done to death.

>>3086279
This is also decent as a subject but it just feels like such a lazy execution.

I can feel in this set that you were walking around and went "Hey, look at that." And then took each photo from exactly the spot where you first saw the subject. At least that's what a lot of these compositions feel like.

If you don't care about your photos why should we?

>>3087150
>This one is okay, probably the best of the set due to odd proportions but dead on front facing photos of odd buildings have been done to death.
>you should compose this in a less visually appealing way because its been done before
you should pick a new hobby

>>3087150
notgettingit.thepost

File: FOTO4762.jpg (524KB, 1050x717px) Image search: [Google]

524KB, 1050x717px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO4780.jpg (408KB, 1050x717px) Image search: [Google]

408KB, 1050x717px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO4783.jpg (366KB, 1050x717px) Image search: [Google]

366KB, 1050x717px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO4820.jpg (440KB, 1050x717px) Image search: [Google]

440KB, 1050x717px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO4831.jpg (459KB, 1050x717px) Image search: [Google]

459KB, 1050x717px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO4808.jpg (525KB, 1050x717px) Image search: [Google]

525KB, 1050x717px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

File: FOTO4796.jpg (312KB, 1050x717px) Image search: [Google]

312KB, 1050x717px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>uncle ken goes faux-lomo, the thread

This is all eye cancer.

>>3086306
I know what you're doing with your work but it's usually not my taste.

I fucking love this shot though.

>>3086274
>Bee Jay's quick stop

Lol what the fuck?? Did they think this one through? Is the joke on purpose?

>>3086296
what is this place?

>>3086725
ah the condescending bait

>>3087403
Some dudes house

>>3087400
Very unlikely to be an intentional joke. Just backroad innocence.
I find most of my subjects wandering down roads that I would otherwise never have a reason to drive down. Seldom used county roads can get wacky. Once, I found someone had hauled a doublewide trailer into the middle of the road and turned the road into their driveway effectively; presumably without permission.

>>3087250
praise jesus

>>3086306
wtf is going on in this shot?

Also I think that you're slowly but surely getting somewhere with the thing where you use "artificial" coloured lighting to achieve foreground background separation as in e.g.
>>3086298
>>3087251

>>3087557
>wtf is going on in this shot?
Through the darkness of future past
The magician longs to see
One chants out between two worlds
Fire walk with me.

>>3087104
Let's have a meet up in Woodbridge.

>>3086272
>>3086285
>>3086286
>>3086303
>>3086304
>>3086308
>>3086311
>>3086317
>>3087251

These are good. Rest are trash

>>3086285
what the fuck is that creepy plant thats in so many of your photos? why dont people just cut it down before it grows into this monstrous shit?

>>3087642

kudzu. its an invasive plant that grows all over the south. there is a movement to eradicate it as it stifles growth on the forest floor by blocking sunlight, enough of it can kill the trees it attaches to

>>3087663
>there is a movement to eradicate it
That's about as fruitless an endeavor as teaching you visual literacy, Shoogs.

Kudzu's not the biggest ecological threat anymore, though. Mimosa trees are the new problem. Kudzu's met her match.

This great thread doesn't deserve to be so far down the catalog!

This is a superb set of photos, and you have done very well!

File: 4079eae613fa21859a1155b1be29da6c.jpg (72KB, 385x395px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 385x395px

>>3086993
>you will never have a dirty, angry, redneck threesome with jess[i]e and jamie

Why even live?

>>3087799
Neither will you. Disembowel yourself now

>>3087799

double dubs confirms

Beautiful photos from a beautiful OP :)

Keep up the good work!

These are the best photos I've seen!

Beautiful, inspiring, breath taking!

Have you won a Guggenheim Fellowship?! Because these photos are Gu-ge-greaaat!!!!

>>3088274
I thought they were going into moma, because they are amomazing!

>everything is shit, the thread
I wished you pulled a 180. Not on taking a photo worth its file size, but on not wanting to kill yourself.

These great photos shouldn't leave the front page.

I fr*cken LOVE this thread!

>>3086291
>>3086299
>>3086306
>>3086495
>>3087246
>>3087250
pretty good

Wow what an excellent thread! That's all I can say, just wow!

>>3088281
Maybe OP is related to Eggleston? Because these are Egg-cellent!

>>3088698
It is time to stop posting and go to bed

Sublime, superlative, sensational; is all i can say about this thread!

>>3088713
>OP gets heartfelt compliments
>anon gets mad
What did the anti-Art anon mean by this?

Not sure what's with all this cringelord spam going on in here, but these are pretty interesting. Very sinister vibes. Feels like a window into another world, I can tell it's America, but it's not the one I grew up in.

Are the red-tinted ones geled flash or are you doing that in post? It's very eye-grabbing.

>>3088740
This!!!

I too feel like it's a window into another world, I can tell it's America, but it's not the one I grew up in™

>>3088740
>>3088744
I agree! These shots are transcendent to the brevity of normality, it's the most exciting art to happen here ever.

Im h*cking scraching my face off right now, thats how PRETTY those are!

WTF im feeling capturious® now!

>>3088762
This spam is so unfunny that it's blatantly obvious which teenage /p/ users are behind it.

These photos are incredible! Congratulations, keep it up!

Wow! My eyes are literally popping out of my skull! Stunning work!

I honestly don't know why you bother posting this kind of work on /p/, you know it's well beyond the attention span of these spamming memelords.

Dark, thematic stuff requires a little more brainpower than "ooh, naked girl, this makes my boner tingle" or "I climbed a mountain again!"

Where did you travel to to find all that bamboo in >>3086317 and such? I can't imagine that's native to Alibami.

Holy fucking shit! WHAT THE FUCK is going on in this thread and why tf these anons are praising tf out of them?
Who is this photog?
And desu these snapshits are dad-tier.

>>3088815
To be honest many photos can lead to interesting discussion, it just depends on who is involved. If you're part of a nature conservation movement, you're into topography/earth sciences or nature a simple scene on the mountainside can evoke all sorts of emotions and thoughts especially if it's done right. Try not to shit on photos because they try to simply look nice because truthfully, there's a lot to be said about what's inside many images if you're interested and have something to say. As the saying goes, a picture says a thousand words.

Why so many trees photos? Do you want to achieve a Diane Arbus-t status? Hehe JK ;) Great captures!

Underrated thread!

>>3087663
>>3087665
Kudzu is also quite tasty, and good for you. Yeah getting rid of it is impossible as you said. So mightaswell eat it.
As to the photo they are just snapshots. They are like the ones I have shot as merely memory shots, so nothing special. Looks like anywhere here in the south. But they are smi interesting to look at.
What kills them is the perspective.

>>3089771
>they are just snapshots
"just" snapshots, or an intentional vernacular snapshot aesthetic?

You know, that's a real thing. Trying to make photos look effortless and honest through deliberate "error."

Some would even say it's one of the defining traits of the Southern Gothic style.

When you've viewed enough of isi's threads, you start to see recurring subjects in different seasons and stages of overgrowth, and to try to get "creative" with your perspective simply ruins the simple charm of the style.

“Walker Evans: A Vernacular Style”

CENTRE POMPIDOU
PARIS
Through August 14
Curated by Clément Chéroux
While Walker Evans is known today primarily for the austere formalism of his documentary-style photographs from the 1930s, this sprawling retrospective—the first ever for Evans in France—argues for a different view. The real significance of Evans’s photographic work, it claims, lies in how he taps into the incantatory power of old weird America, the folky vernacular culture evident in the outmoded and overlooked: handpainted signs, rural wooden churches built without architects, rotogravure news photos, penny postcards, Polaroid snapshots. A flaneur of the American byways, Evans not only photographed these subjects with attentive zeal but was also a passionate collector of commonplace cultural artifacts, dozens of which are included in the exhibition. For him, as for the Surrealists, such found objects and images were revelatory documents of everyday life, cast in opposition to successive waves of modernist sameness."

http://www.geoffwinningham.com/
http://www.getty.edu/art/collection/artists/6612/william-christenberry-american-1936-2016/
and countless others

this is the tradition of photography that isi is clearly inspired by. To mistake it as "simple snapshots" is a reflection of what one might call a narcissistic need to leave your "mark" on a photograph.

STUNNING, breathtaking, marvelous work! A tour de force!

>>3089776
>>3089781
>all of this dribble typing
>talking about yourself in the 3rd person
>implied self importance

Have you been checked out for paranoid schizophrenia?

>>3086265
Nice blogpost

>>3089055
truth. I don't understand why people are praising these shit-tier snapshits

>>3086495
Lmao at that building's proportions.

How do you get around to the places you photograph? Walk/drive/bicycle? Also, does taking photographs attract a lot of attention from passerby? When I was taking photos around my hometown I remember that everyone would always stop and ask me what I was taking a picture of--not in a suspicious way, but as a sort of friendly display of interest. Of course, they would then universally suggest that I take pictures of the town's single, depressing gimmick of a tourist attraction (The town boasts of having the X-est Z in all of Y).

>>3091381
>paranoid schizophrenia

Is it just me or does this anon have some sort of personal vendetta against schizophrenic people? Like, why are you always bringing up schizophrenia in your insults? You seem seriously bigoted against people with mental health issues. Anyways, I would suggest that you address whatever is troubling you directly, i.e. in real life, instead of sublimating it in your posting style on chinese cartoon image boards.

>>3091381
Cut and paste probably

Have you been checked out for snivelling twat?

>>3089781
>>3089776
I like some "snapshots" because they manage to make busy compositions or ordinary things look pleasing somehow. If it's deliberate in a way without being overly stylized it can look good. My hesitation is with praising any old thing simply because it eschewed traditional rules about composition and framing and opted to shot from eye-level, slightly off center.

>>3095792
yes its copied and pasted from an article about the exhibit mentioned, google confirms

>>3095787
Making you aware of your mental health symptoms != personal attacks. That's the thing with ps, it will make you think the most innocent of help is out to get you.

I hope you find the help you need.

>>3096274
but you're the one with the mental health symptoms, honey. That's what fuels this delusion about diagnosing people on 4chan.

I hope you find the medical incarceration you need.