why is this image a migraine-inducing mess? is it an inherently

File: P1020153.jpg (2MB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1000x1000px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Panasonic
Camera Model	DMC-LX100
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.10 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.3
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	40 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:30 16:35:47
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/2.5
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/2.5
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	15.40 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: P1020153-2.jpg (117KB, 220x220px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 220x220px

>>3086192
the path at 100%

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Panasonic
Camera Model	DMC-LX100
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.10 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.3
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	40 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:30 16:37:42
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/2.5
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/2.5
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	15.40 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>3086189
It's a lot of fine detail with nothing to focus on, so your eyes just wander around taking in all the info at once.

>>3086189
>>3086192
The light in these is pretty flat. They would make more sense to the eye if the light was a little more directional/angled.

File: P1020158.jpg (2MB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1000x1000px

>>3086199
>>3086202
i guess the lesson is; don't fill photos with fine detail, especially during overcast..
thanks

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Panasonic
Camera Model	DMC-LX100
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.10 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	88 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:30 17:00:57
Exposure Time	1/15 sec
F-Number	f/7.1
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/7.1
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	34.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>3086189
>why is this image a migraine-inducing mess?
because its not shot on film.

>>3086213
how would it look different on film?

>>3086214
That anon is shitposting.

>>3086212
This is better, not just because there's more macro details, but because there's more variation in color and light and texture. It's still not quite what I'd consider a pleasing composition (it feels like a crop of a larger photo), but it's getting there.

File: untitled.jpg (734KB, 1111x1104px) Image search: [Google]

734KB, 1111x1104px

>>3086214
I don't think it would. Might be the shit scan?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi

File: untitled.jpg (717KB, 1111x1104px) Image search: [Google]

717KB, 1111x1104px

>>3086254

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi

File: untitled.jpg (799KB, 1111x1111px) Image search: [Google]

799KB, 1111x1111px

>>3086256

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi

>>3086258

Was this taken in California?

>>3086259
Norway

File: _MG_6039.jpg (2MB, 1080x1350px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1080x1350px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS Rebel T6i
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	256 dpi
Vertical Resolution	256 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:15 00:18:45
Exposure Time	1/80 sec
F-Number	f/10.0
Exposure Program	Shutter Priority
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/10.0
Exposure Bias	-1/3 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	60.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	1080
Image Height	1350
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3086278
This is my favorite. Good lines, good perspective, nice interplay of light, very inviting to the viewer.

>>3086278
This is good

>>3086189
No subject isolation. The subject (i am assuming the tree) blends in with the background making your eyes navigation of the image slow and unnatuaral. Try to blur the background a bit with a fast lens.

>>3086417
Also it helps to have a subject that stands out against the background