whatdya think of this portrait? did i do good, /p/? [EXIF data

yeah, I like it

>>3085601
it's not good. but it's not bad.

Her face is out of focus

>>3085601
Add a bit more titty and you're ready for #persuitofportriats and girlgaze lifeman

But srs not bad man aside from hair in face and focus

pick a less ugly girl next time

It's fucking shit - quit while ur ahead photo is bad cuz girl is ugly. Enjoy this top quality /p/ tier critique

>>3085601
Hair under the left eye is a bit annoying, maybe zoom in on the face next time and check for stuff like that.

File: IMG_3935.jpg (620KB, 801x1001px) Image search: [Google]

620KB, 801x1001px

>>3085620
>photo is bad cuz girl is ugly
>top quality /p/ tier critique

literally the best /p/ advice you can get

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS REBEL T2i
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3456
Image Height	5184
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:29 16:02:32
Exposure Time	1/100 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	801
Image Height	1001
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3085601
I like it OP. Also girl looks pretty. Keep it up

>face not in focus
>Hair in the way of face
>Too much plant taking focus away from the girl

It's not good, but it's good enough for Instagram normies

>>3085601
CRUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUSHED

>>3085620
Yes, sounds like /p/ all right.

>>3085601
Pretty good, OP. The blacks are a little crushed, but that's not a huge thing. You nailed a good mood. The pose is maybe a little cliche, but there's enough other detail and feeling to distract.

Keep shooting.

Not bad. Face a bit out of focus tho.

>>3085601

She looks bored

Maybe next time try and portray and emotion or have her look like she's interested in something, but in this photo her expression says she's thinking about being somewhere else imo

File: Shoe.jpg (144KB, 692x860px) Image search: [Google]

144KB, 692x860px

Please This

>>3085831
well maybe that's how OP wanted to portray her, ever thought about that fuckface? why dont you use your brain a little before writing that stupid as fuck comment on my /p/

>>3085980

Was this supposed to sound "badass" in your head?

OP asked for opinions on the shot and that was my opinion. Get OP's dick our of your mouth before replying

>bad crap
>distracting plant on the right
>probably using f16 [KEK]
>OOF face

>>308598
OP wanted an critique on his technique, not a shitty opinion from someone who obviously doesn't understand the difference between creative decisions & technical shortcomings. Don't fucking comment on /p/ again

File: Beerad-4.jpg (306KB, 789x1024px) Image search: [Google]

306KB, 789x1024px

how bout this one

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

>>3085945
ocd kicking in, aye? you schmock.

>>3086738
>calling perhaps the only remaining competent photographer on this board a
>schmock

>>3086895
>bjdrew
>competent
the fact that anyone ever believed this goes to show how amateur the boards golden age really was
bjdrew is a stereotypical rich leica dad. his photos are awful to mediocre with zero exceptions.

Looks a little soft to me, like I'm searching and searching for the focal point and can't quite find it. The blanks are creeping in a tad too much imo, but that's your choice. Like the colors. Like the pose. Like the setting.

>>3086953
*citation required
Buttmad Anon, 2017 doesn't meet inclusion critera.

>>3085945
Yeah i noticed this when i imported it, bothers me as well.

>>3085945
Don't listen to this cuck.

Nothing wrong with cropping off the foot, more space would just make the composition more awkward due to more empty space.

>>3087989
Burden of proof otherwise appears to be on you, Leicaboss.

>>3088651
Three small bits of evidence that cast shade on your claims:
1. Wasn't a dad when taking photos. Basically stopped cold when I started dadding
2. Paid for my Leica stuff mostly by buying, fixing/cleaning and selling gear and selling/licensing photos.
3. I mostly shot/shoot with Canon/Sony

Given that I've never really held my own images in particularly high regard, trying to convince a butthurt anon that one of them doesn't suck seems pointless.

>>3086321
>the only way to take photographs is to have a disgustingly shallow dof and muh bokeh

most of the comments on this are from fags who think any picture with a girl is automatically gold.

picture is shit mate.
>Boring, uninspired subject
>poorly composed, cropping off foot
>Ugly, distracting background
>bored model who has annoying hair across her face
>No interesting colours or subject to draw eye to
>poor PP

Positives? Ummm.... you went outside gj?