what focal length was this taken? [EXIF data available. Click

>>3085358
anything from F8 to 11.

>>3085358
it's a screenshot, there is no focal length

If it's a single photo and not some stitch, sub 20mm full frame equiv with the stretched out sides/corners cropped, I'd guess? Real question is, what height was this taken from?

addendum: source: Pergamon Museum 3, Berlin 2001, © Thomas Struth, an arranged piece

Judging by the date and image quality, I'd wager a 6x7 mf camera, 55 or more likely 45mm focal.

>>3085371
Come on kurwa, you're smarter than this. It's clearly had movements done. Most likely 4x5.

>>3085374
>>3085371
Just did a bit of research, apparently it's a 13x18 camera...basically a 5x7.

>http://www.artnet.com/magazine/features/tuchman/tuchman7-8-03.asp

>>3085374
Yeah, I should actually research stuff before I post guesses. Some source cites him using a 13x18 (5×7 inches) camera, and the pergamon museum series utilising models, so all nice and posed and static with the lighting meticulously controlled. So, whatever 5×7 wide lens with movements, after all. Can't help but wonder why the OP uploaded it with a digital camera filename, other than knowing exactly what is is and wanting a free rise out of /p/. Well, here I am, gg. Thanks for directing my attention to an interesting piece, at any rate.

>>3085377
Screenshot with iPhone from an Instagram post.

File: Thomas-Struth.jpg (1MB, 2844x1890px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2844x1890px

>>3085391
Apparently this guy is all about large format stuff. Lots of very interesting works, worth googling his stuff.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi

>>3085397

He's part of the kunstakademie you tasteless pleb. He trained under the Bechers alongside Gursky, Candida Hofer, Thomas Ruff.

>>3085413
So basically you're permanently frustrated because you took an Arts degree, is that it?

I like how kurwa is happy about his own ignorance

>>3085358
About 4mm because it was taken with a phone.

>>3085358

For me this was taken on an original Lytro camera

>>3085623

lol wut

>>3085361
>focal length

>>3085358
looks like it was taken with a medium format camera anyway

>>3085648

Are you fucktards all too stupid to even read the thread?