Thread replies: 17
Thread images: 5
Thread images: 5
File: konost_ff_top.jpg (517KB, 1744x981px) Image search:
[Google]
517KB, 1744x981px
http://konost.com/rangefinder/
So what do you guys think of this? Something worth considering if using M lenses but can't afford an actual Leica body? Or pointless when you can just use an adapter on a mirror-less body?
For me, its a question of whether or not that viewfinder is an actual rangefinder, or just a rangefinder-esque viewfinder like the Fuji Xpro.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2014 (Macintosh) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1754 Image Height 1240 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2014:11:19 23:45:48 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1744 Image Height 981
>>
Delete this thread just like the last one. It's vaporware and you're a retarded hipster with shit photos.
Please dutifully remove yourself from the genepool.
>>
>>3078572
They haven't updated their site in months and all the investors who were interested in potentially investing have stated their refusal to release anything than vague press releases and updates on Facebook changed their mind. Their radio silence is killing them
>>
>>
>>3078584
Just get a second hand A7 for like $700-800. It's the lenses that will kill you anyways, not the body. I have a feeling this camera will cost more than the slated "Rangefinder for the masses", and will probably be somewhere in the $1500-2000 range they figure out that full frame sensors aren't cheap; that's to say that they will ever go into production.
>>
>>3078584
They stated it will be an actual rangefinder, but the market for rangefinder is already slim as it is, so this will just try to compete with everyone too poor to invest in a Leica, but that market is small to begin with. The general photographer population is too retarded to use a range finder
>>
>>3078572
Good digital Reica velly cheap, better than reel Reica
>>
>>3078572
that looks so fucking ugly
>>
>>3078572
can someone please show me any quality product that's come out of crowd funding?
>>
>>3078621
https://store.rhinolaces.com/
>>
>>3078629
It just looks like paracord. The lifetime warranty thing is kind of nice, but I still don't understand why.
>>
File: display2.jpg (304KB, 1000x501px) Image search:
[Google]
304KB, 1000x501px
>>3078572
An a7ii w/techart pro is vastly superior.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CS5 Macintosh Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1000 Image Height 501 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 200 dpi Vertical Resolution 200 dpi Image Created 2016:02:11 19:10:55 Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 501
>>
File: pebble.png (554KB, 1234x926px) Image search:
[Google]
554KB, 1234x926px
>>3078621
The only good smartwatch ever made.
They got bought out though.
>>
>>3078572
>using M lenses but can't afford an actual Leica body?
Then, you're doing something wrong.
>>
File: 1494004311791.png (22KB, 418x559px) Image search:
[Google]
22KB, 418x559px
>>3078621
Yooka-Laylee bitch
>>
>>3078572
Get a GXR with the M-mount snap-on.
Thread posts: 17
Thread images: 5
Thread images: 5