How can one achieve the nolan IMAX 70mm look like in pic related

>>3075119
You can apply VSCO presets to B-Roll

File: CineDigitar133xMphoto.jpg (356KB, 1584x1536px) Image search: [Google]

356KB, 1584x1536px

perhaps by shooting scope

File: 1479102731358.gif (3MB, 640x266px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 640x266px

>>3075119
>70mm
>on a full frame sony

Joking aside though not all of The Dark Knight was filmed in IMAX, which is common for IMAX movies. The IMAX footage is not as as wide as 3:2. The image you posted is 16:9 so it is most likely just regular old cinema. It could be a cropped IMAX frame but I doubt it. If I remember my Dark Knight correctly, that is not one of the IMAX scenes.

The aesthetic from an ultra fast wide angle lens then the image was graded. Real cinema lenses can be really fast even when they are super wide. I'm talking 12mm T1.3. I don't see many ultra fast wide lenses on Sony's line-up because like all the other camera manufacturers they are for consumers not pros. Your best bet is whatever is widest and fastest on the Sony. Maybe a 25mm f2 or 20 f1.8. You just have to make sure the lenses are sharp wide open. If you don't have a fast wide lens and are not willing to buy them then you can try the Brenizer method (aka bokeh panorama) for subjects that don't move. For color just find a cold and saturated preset. They are everywhere, even instagram has them I think. It's not going to be as good but it will get you close.

I think you are more interested in the aethetics than the technical side of it but if you want to read some interesting technical stuff you can try this:
http://www.theasc.com/ac_magazine/August2012/DarkKnightRises/page1.php

Unfortunately it's for Dark Knight Rises not the first one but it is still interesting info.


TL:DR ultra fast wide angle + cool and saturated grading

>>3075119
Cyan shadows, orange highlights. That's the Hollywood way.

File: IMG_20160528_051701.jpg (948KB, 2448x2448px) Image search: [Google]

948KB, 2448x2448px

Slr Magic Anamorphot 1.33x this was taken with the A7RII. used the kodak LUT on it too.

>>3075182

i forgot to mention its attached to a 55mm 1.8 Zeiss

>>3075182
Do I just need the step up ring that it comes with to mount it to lenses?

>>3075198

yes. it comes with the adaptor i think.

>>3075119
medium format lens + kipon speed booster.

>>3075182
can sony shoot video in full 3:2?

File: 23793474190_10e0f39337_k.jpg (297KB, 2048x577px) Image search: [Google]

297KB, 2048x577px

>>3075255

nope but 16:9 hence the 1.33x adaptor instead of 2x. 2x on a 16:9 is overkill.

GH4 can do a 4:3 and it looks much better with a 2x

pic related is a 16:9 with a 2x Hypergonar Hi-fi 2 and its already cropped slightly due to some mad vignetting (i was using a zeiss 55 1.8)

>>3075272
>tfw gh5 at full 4:3 capture, sensor area size is still smaller by 29% than sony apsc cropped to 16:9

>>3075182
take a step back my nigga

There's a medium format to full frame speed booster out there, forgot the name

>>3075186
best glass I've ever had

>>3076307
Yup, this is the answer.

Of you need to ask you definitely shouldn't be using a fool frame speed booster. Actually having shit in focus is not a bad thing.

>>3076307
this

File: 35mm-vs-IMAX-format-70mm-film-size-620x.jpg (20KB, 620x350px) Image search: [Google]

20KB, 620x350px

>>3075119
by shooting 70mm film

>>3079548
can't wait for kipon to make a speed booster of 70mm lens for gfx50.

>>3079575
I want to see anamorphic lenses which can cover medium format, even if it's at least 33x44 format, just for the look they produce.
Anyone know if anything close might exist already?

>>3075119
You don't use a fucking fuji :DDDDDDDDD
You're going to need to find a way to convert a russian anamorphic lens to your tiny shitty little e mount sony. You have to realize that this stuff is shot on cameras you can't even own, though the insurance alone costs millions of dollars and it comes with it's own technician.

>>3076307
even with a speedbooster, native 35mm glass is still faster.