One of my favorite photos. I love the composition because I think

>>3069228
>the golden triangle
stop speaking nonsense.

I think you ought to keep your photos isolated to one thread if you want good feedback and for everyone on /p/ to not hate you.

I also think your grasp of composition is shaky at best, that you think it's far more important to a photo than it actually is, that you aren't as good at compositon as you think you are, and that you're a slave to the gritty new york black and white meme.

File: 913b1024-7250-43e5-a40a-ccfd8e1d75ff.png (1MB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1600x900px

>>3069228
>>3069231
????

>>3069232
Nah bro, golden triangle is on point AF.

>>3069236

nah bruh it's ad hoc AF analysis to make you feel better about your snapshit and give you the illusion that it's deeper and more nuanced than it really is. you could draw imaginary lines all over your photo, that doesn't mean they are worth shit.

>>3069235
>around a 30-60-90 right triangle
>golden triangle

File: IMG_0304.jpg (5MB, 6000x3375px) Image search: [Google]

5MB, 6000x3375px

Lines all over the place. I see it now.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 80D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.8 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:04 01:00:36
Exposure Time	1/80 sec
F-Number	f/4.5
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	320
Lens Aperture	f/4.5
Exposure Bias	-1/3 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	24.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	6000
Image Height	3375
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3069533
>le sinister diagomeme

>>because I think the golden triangle was executed well.

That's a weird thing to like a photo for