What do you think are the best remaining ISO 100-200 35mm color

Ektar is the only kodak film worth shooting.

>>3065079
>I would shoot tons of Provia if slide film development didn't cost a fortune.

What does it cost you? I get a free development coupon for every roll of slide film I buy from my local shop. It's about 10€ per roll of 120. E6 development alone would be 2.10€

>>3065082
Kodak currently has no good color films period. Hopefully the new Ektachrome is nice.

>>3065186
Why do you think Portra is not good?

>>3065079
Holy shit the film in the OP pic looks fucking awful.

What's the deal with Ektar 100? I am going through flickr and the colors in all photos seem off and not in a pleasant way.

>>3065173
It costs 20 dollars US per roll at all of the places around here.

>>3065186
Ektar is nice. Not especially interesting but fine grain and pretty neutral/warm colors

>>3065224
It's not a film that can be pushed or overexposed. The colors look pretty true to life for a color negative film so it's really their processing if it looks especially weird. Really comparing portra to ektar, ektar is just more contrasty and finer grain, the colors rendition extremely similar.

File: IMG_4222.jpg (600KB, 1996x984px) Image search: [Google]

600KB, 1996x984px

>>3065224
Ektar on the right, portra on the left. Both look fine desu, processing/scanning might lead to weird results if people don't know what they're doing. The film doesn't have much character but it's the finest grain color negative film you can buy.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1996
Image Height	984
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3065287

confirmed for never shooting film.

>>3065290
?
Ektar is a film with less exposure latitude than many color neg films, what of my statement do you take issue with.

>>3065300

the fact that you think the color rendition is similar.

File: IMG_4224.jpg (397KB, 1972x987px) Image search: [Google]

397KB, 1972x987px

>>3065303
It is. I would say ektar looks better and it's far contrastier and there's a bit of a different cast (that could partially be due to the scan as well) but the color rendition (ignore the contrast/shadows) is quite similar, it's supposed to be. I didn't say they look the same, but they're more similar than comparing it to a Fuji film or something which looks so drastically different in every way

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1972
Image Height	987
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: IMG_4225.jpg (488KB, 900x672px) Image search: [Google]

488KB, 900x672px

>>3065303
Again, similar does not mean the same, didn't say the films look the same because ektar has a bit of a magenta color cast and is much contrastier

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	900
Image Height	672
Scene Capture Type	Standard

I hate ektar

File: Hevossaari 06 03.jpg (1MB, 1440x983px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1440x983px

>>3065224
Ektar is a nasty film to deal with because its color profile is very unpredictable and requires heavy-handed work in post. It seems to be extremely sensitive to variations in exposure, like slide film but in a different way. In one frame you get vivid, powerful colors and the next one comes out with a pale blue cast that makes everything look dead. It requires lots of fine tuning in post, as opposed to Portra that seems to come out nice and natural every time. Ektar has a characteristic "coldness" to it that's fine sometimes, but it robs the life out of the scene and makes summer shots look uncanny. Like a bright summer day in late July when winds suddenly shift and the temp drops below +10C. Pic related, it's one of my old Ektar snasphits.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>3065305
>>3065306

The ektar is plainly more saturated, which is a characteristic for which it is well known.

>>3065308
That's a horrible photograph

>>3065309
More saturation+more contrast=/= significantly different colors. If I took the same pics with another film the greens would be so different

>>3065308
Sounds like you just suck with shooting with it and you have your scanner settings on auto desu

Is ektar the only ISO 100 color film left besides slide film? The detail is great and I shoot during the day most of the time but like I said in an earlier post, slide film costs a ton to develop around here so I don't know if there are alternatives to shooting ektar.

>>3065311

Nah, you're wrong. I can spot ektar from a mile away, even with you trying to hide it by shooting ugly brown garbage.

File: Japanfilm-020035.jpg (1MB, 1840x1232px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1840x1232px

>>3065318
Ektar y/n?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera Model	SP-3000
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.8 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	150 dpi
Vertical Resolution	150 dpi
Image Created	2017:03:01 19:44:54
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1840
Image Height	1232

File: me-063.jpg (655KB, 2444x1536px) Image search: [Google]

655KB, 2444x1536px

>>3065318
Ektar?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.8 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	150 dpi
Vertical Resolution	150 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:07 18:09:57
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2444
Image Height	1536

>>3065318
I'm waiting anon

>>3065322
>>3065321

They're both garbage.

>>3065354
Thanks for proving you were full of shit.
Didn't say they were good pics haha, I'm aware they're not I chose them because it's not super obvious which films they are

>>3065377

I was just trying to hurt your feelings. Top is portra, bottom is ektar.

>>3065321
dunno why but this reminds me of c200 or superia

must be the lab scan

File: slidenansldn175-Edit.jpg (875KB, 800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

875KB, 800x1200px

not that agressive guy, i like ektar. just guessing for the fun of it
>>3065321
looks kinda like kodak gold?
>>3065322
im guessing that this is ektar, but the grain is making me unsure.. might just be cropped a bit?

>>3065079
provia is so fucking addictive

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	70 dpi
Vertical Resolution	70 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>3065387
>kodak gold
scratch that, i guess superia too

File: 1.jpg (311KB, 1500x996px) Image search: [Google]

311KB, 1500x996px

Let's play guess the film stock.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D3100
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	664
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:28 00:15:08
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	1/3 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Focal Length	5.00 mm
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: 2.jpg (479KB, 1500x996px) Image search: [Google]

479KB, 1500x996px

>>3065395
I apologize for any and all strange colour casts.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D3100
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	664
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:28 00:15:11
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	1/3 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Focal Length	5.00 mm
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: 3.jpg (306KB, 1500x996px) Image search: [Google]

306KB, 1500x996px

>>3065396
I'll be honest, I just mashed the film's preset button and played around a bit with white/black levels in ColorPerfect.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D3100
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	664
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:28 00:15:12
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	1/3 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Focal Length	5.00 mm
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

File: 4.jpg (413KB, 1500x996px) Image search: [Google]

413KB, 1500x996px

>>3065397
>tfw you loaded 100 speed film in the summer, but it's another rainy winter before you know it and you still have 8 frames left that are practically useless unless you want to shoot at f2

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D3100
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	664
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:28 00:15:16
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Exposure Bias	1/3 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Focal Length	5.00 mm
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>3065381
Wrong and wrong
Neither are ektar, top is Fuji superia and bottom is portra

>>3065403

That's a dirty trick, you faggot.

>>3065383
It's superia. Nice
>>3065387
Bottom is portra, top is Fuji superia

>>3065404
K.
Just proving you can't actually see that shit from a "mile away". I'm a film fag and it's hilarious when I see film fags say that shit, some films are obvious like the superia, that film looks extremely unnatural but pleasing but a lot of other films look quite similar to each other in different situations and differences are only hugely noticeable when compared side by side

File: 3078012573_48cb105cef_o.jpg (985KB, 1000x675px) Image search: [Google]

985KB, 1000x675px

>>3065407

K.
It's not like your cherry-picked bullshit photos prove anything, especially when the test was rigged from the beginning.

What's this photo? Portra or ektar?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2008:12:02 17:41:53

File: 3015193190_91cb3612e7_o.jpg (2MB, 1215x1800px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1215x1800px

>>3065413

And this one?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2008:11:08 20:39:49

File: -2.jpg (1MB, 1416x900px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1416x900px

>>3065398
ill join in

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.8 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:28 09:54:18
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: -2-2.jpg (1MB, 900x1350px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 900x1350px

>>3065417

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.8 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:28 09:56:02
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: Jimmy Ektar 100.jpg (2MB, 2000x1344px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2000x1344px

Ektar is quite lovely.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Plustek
Camera Model	OpticFilm 8200i
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:11 22:10:33

>>3065413
>test was rigged
>cherry picked bullshit photos

>I-I can spot ektar a mile away


Why are you testing me now? You already proved my point, I never said I could spot ektar a mile away, you were the one that said that and I proved you actually can't because you thought portra was ektar. I never claimed to be one who can identify every film so I don't see why you're testing me now lol.

>>3065569

Could these be mistaken for portra?

>>3065441
qt cat, nice shot.

File: Xpan_12dec2016ek100-5_1kpx.jpg (1MB, 1999x750px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1999x750px

Ektar has this weird color effect florescence which is really nice..

File: 98500023.jpg (764KB, 1512x1002px) Image search: [Google]

764KB, 1512x1002px

>>3065415
not ektar, is my guess

this is how all my yellows come out on ektar

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	EZ Controller 6.10.011 (130930)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1512
Image Height	1002

>>3065190
Because Portra has no character. It's just a bland, offend nobody film.

>>3065958

Oh, it's definitely ektar.

>>3065395
???
>>3065396
Ektar
>>3065397
Ektar
>>3065398
Gold, but not as saturated?

>>3065079
ektar is fucking trash and that picture right there sucks shit. i bet fucking velvia 50 would have handled the highlights better.

ektar wants to be slide film and does a terrible job at it, palette is awful, colors are all terrible and you cant say its warm nor cold, its just lousy and loud with saturation, its like it comes with vibrancy boosted all the way up. it always comes up looking super magenta and cyan, an all around turd. kodak def lost it.

>>3065396
thats motherfucking ektar with its nearly uncorrectable shitty red midtones.

File: 98500023 (2).jpg (581KB, 1400x928px) Image search: [Google]

581KB, 1400x928px

>>3065973
well ill be

must have been real good light then because my yellows always fade super hard and I have to correct them quite a bit to get them where I want

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:02:06 16:38:15
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>3067970
there they are, classic cyan shadows and cyan fuckery in underexposed areas. i hate that film.

File: 98500034-2.jpg (1MB, 1066x1400px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1066x1400px

>>3067974
that was fucked with quite a bit to achieve those colors. I wanted to see how far I'd have to adjust them to get them 'right'

I enjoyed some of the results for a lot of the other stuff I shot with it but its definitely not a film I'd use a lot

lso I shot on a konica big mini at really early light so these definitely aren't ideal results to test this film just my two cents

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.7 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:10 22:25:14
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>3067974
>>3067939
sounds like someone cant expose properly, but ok

>>3067976

That looks good as hell bro

File: orangeblueposters.jpg (1MB, 640x1860px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 640x1860px

>>3067970
>>3067974

Ektar, doing it before it was cool.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2015:05:12 15:19:11
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	640
Image Height	1860