[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Here's a dumb Superia 400 snapshit The bottom is the lab

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 28
Thread images: 9

Here's a dumb Superia 400 snapshit

The bottom is the lab scan, the top is how I expected it to look and how I treat it in post

What's going on here? Did I overexpose the shot?
Did the lab turn the brightness and change the tint too much during scanning?


Which one would you say is a better look?

Ignore that it's a dumb snapshit, it was just the most obvious example I could find
>>
>>3061386
>Ignore that it's a dumb snapshit, it was just the most obvious example I could find
kek
>>
>>3061389
I mean the most obvious example of the difference between the lab scans and what I would expect to be proper exposure
>>
>>3061386
Appears she goes commando. Icky
>>
How much did you pay for it?
>>
>>3061415
Like 7 bucks per roll (developing and scanning)
>>
>>3061386
Tops too yellow, should be slightly green.
Bottom is too blue. for superia atleast.

Not overexposed.
>>
I guess you could say that film isn't all it's .. cracked up to be..
>>
File: 1492479906456.jpg (1015KB, 1840x1232px) Image search: [Google]
1492479906456.jpg
1015KB, 1840x1232px
>>3061386

I just finished my first roll too.

I posted in the /fgt/ thread too, but every single one of my development scans seem blown out as fuck like yours.

I am thinking it is just an unfortunate side effect of the automated scanning.

I will take proper DSLR scans when my film holder arrives in a week or so.

>>3061393

Her jeans probably have a snail trail.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment MakeFUJI PHOTO FILM CO., LTD.
Camera ModelSP-2000
Camera SoftwareFDi V4.5 / FRONTIER350/370-7.7-0J-060
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2017:04:16 16:26:13
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width1840
Image Height1232
>>
>>3061386
pretty sure the labs that are offering cheap develop+scan services just run their shit on autopilot. you see the same sort of stuff on home scanners if you leave yours on auto, it'll do shit like "backlight correction" that's only actually necessary if you have old, faded negs sitting in a box somewhere or you have no intention of doing PP, which I guess is something they won't take for granted.
>>
>>3061386
Why did you expect it to look like it had an Instagram filter? Bottom is much better.
>>
>>3061386
Your white balance isn't accurate. Just look at the white paint and bucket.
>>
File: IMM007_16.jpg (2MB, 1536x1024px) Image search: [Google]
IMM007_16.jpg
2MB, 1536x1024px
>>3061563
>>3061421
Meanwhile in germany with its top quality scans which I paid like 5.50 for (plus developing and printing tho)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareCEWE / IMAGE CD
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationRight-Hand, Top
>>
File: IMG_3518.jpg (1MB, 1830x2287px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_3518.jpg
1MB, 1830x2287px
>>3061563
Yep basically this

>>3061703
Jealous, most of mine just look blow out.
Some of them look good but it depends entirely on luck I guess. I wonder if they're even looking at anything or just leaving the scanner on auto

If I don't have any skies in the pic (like pic related) then the scans are passable
Skies are all blown out to full white
>>
File: IMM020_16.jpg (2MB, 1536x1024px) Image search: [Google]
IMM020_16.jpg
2MB, 1536x1024px
>>3061708
I'm kidding I hate these scans I don't think they look good at all

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareCEWE / IMAGE CD
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationBottom, Right-Hand
>>
File: IMG_3448.jpg (2MB, 2716x1830px) Image search: [Google]
IMG_3448.jpg
2MB, 2716x1830px
>>3061709
Lol that one actually looks worse than mine
Mine are hit and miss honestly. I have no idea if any lab techs are actually looking at things or if they leave everything on auto
I'd honestly prefer it they just got a faithful negative scan and then I'd correct things if I felt like it

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image OrientationTop, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Color Space InformationsRGB
Image Width2716
Image Height1830
Scene Capture TypeStandard
>>
>>3061563
>Her jeans probably have a snail trail.
hot
>>
>>3061386
Lab scans are shit, it's little more than a shitty point and shoot on auto mode.

Your original picture should have just been scanned at a lower exposure, get a dslr scan rig, or live with shit scans.
>>
>>3061711
What film were used here ? Superia ?
>>
>>3061711
wtf this is amazing?
>>
>>3062163
bump
>>
>>3062163
>>3062167
Hey guys I just saw this. Yeah I was using Superia 400 for this

I assumed it was a mediocre pic since I got very low social media response idk
Here's my IG post for reference

https://instagram.com/p/BTKhADqA_57/
>>
>>3061562
kill yourself, my man
>>
>>3061711
Don't get lab scans unless you're willing to pay for expensive drum scanning. You're just wasting your money as is.
>>
>>3063256
>https://instagram.com/p/BTKhADqA_57
I think you edit your photos too flat.
>>
File: Superia400-002.jpg (3MB, 3636x2432px) Image search: [Google]
Superia400-002.jpg
3MB, 3636x2432px
Dumping my Superia 400 pics taken with a Nikkormat EL. Found out after this roll that it has crazy light leaks which is a bummer since I've got a roll of Portra 160 in it which is 2-frames-deep :(

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.9 (Windows)
PhotographerCamden Fenton
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution72 dpi
Vertical Resolution72 dpi
Image Created2017:04:17 14:42:14
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
File: Superia400_010.jpg (599KB, 669x1000px) Image search: [Google]
Superia400_010.jpg
599KB, 669x1000px
>>3064792
Ignore the res on that last one

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.9 (Windows)
PhotographerCamden Fenton
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution150 dpi
Vertical Resolution150 dpi
Image Created2017:04:27 20:21:50
Color Space InformationsRGB
>>
File: Superia400_011.jpg (379KB, 1000x669px) Image search: [Google]
Superia400_011.jpg
379KB, 1000x669px
>>3064794

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera SoftwareAdobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.9 (Windows)
PhotographerCamden Fenton
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution150 dpi
Vertical Resolution150 dpi
Image Created2017:04:27 20:24:21
Color Space InformationsRGB
Thread posts: 28
Thread images: 9


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.