Hired a photographer to shoot an event and the photographer delivered

as said, event photographers are literal bottom of the barrel tier. you shouldnt pay him, hes shit and delivered shit.

That grotesque font they used in their watermark should have been the first clue that they were worthless. It's your fault for even hiring them.

What I have to ask is.
Was this a Craigslist shooter, that you wanted to do the gig for cheap?
Did you look at their portfolio if they had one?

Post more of the bad pictures please, we need some humor on this board besides Sugar's threads

>>3052181
this gotta be a troll thread lol

File: 1483206286347.jpg (379KB, 1111x597px) Image search: [Google]

379KB, 1111x597px

You didn't even look at the dude's previous stuff, did you?

http://www.sarnehed.se/index.html
the sax-guy photo should have been a clue that these guys are shit.

File: exempelbild.jpg (2MB, 5472x3648px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 5472x3648px

>>3052319
Fucking hell.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 70D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:05:01 23:50:41
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/3.5
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	5472
Image Height	3648
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3052308
what? no this is not a troll thread. just look at his "pictures" they are fuckin horrible and he delivered shitty pictures from an event.

File: company.jpg (208KB, 1183x939px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 1183x939px

>>3052304
"Professional pictures for your company"

>>3052181
Pay the fuck up, lack of research is entirely your fault. Maybe try to get a discounted price on account of the shittiness, but you have to honor the payment for being such an idiot.

>>3052324
Can someone please explain to a beginner (bought my first camera 2 weeks ago) what is wrong with this picture?

File: 17814538_1874650599477382_459816592588869922_o (1).jpg (234KB, 2048x1759px) Image search: [Google]

234KB, 2048x1759px

>>3052343
Ofc he will get paid but holy shit I'll never recommend him to anyone.

>>3052347
Look at the background.

>>3052347
Blown out (overexposed) Sky and water. The boat behind him messes up both his silhouette and the balance of the photo. Probably would be better with the walkway parallel to the horizon.

File: 17758510_1874652426143866_7491983292973735119_o.jpg (216KB, 2048x1369px) Image search: [Google]

216KB, 2048x1369px

>>3052304
he must be this shitty on purpose.

File: 740c18eb65b14c22ab2d813627645cd1.png (384KB, 377x583px) Image search: [Google]

384KB, 377x583px

>>3052350
>>3052351
Not to mention he really should have used a portrait orientation.

>>3052324
What the other anon said and the background is too busy and the subject too far away and kinda boring.

File: 1457762902922.jpg (59KB, 400x571px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 400x571px

>that fucking watermark

File: davros.jpg (163KB, 922x547px) Image search: [Google]

163KB, 922x547px

>>3052181

Sarnehed, sorry mate, but you're a shit event photog. These are bad.

>noob here

looks like pictures i'd take on my phone to show my mates something. like "saw this car in the city today" point and shoot

lol

and that watermark is fucking horrid

>>3052304
just look at whatever snaps isi uploads

>>3052352
looks like someone took a random crop of a random picture and slapped a huge watermark on top of it. embarrassing.

>>3052340
lol that crop

>>3052181
Yuo get what you pay for, or less.

File: 17807452_1874651742810601_85038959105201550_o.jpg (214KB, 1255x2048px) Image search: [Google]

214KB, 1255x2048px

>>3052538

File: 17761222_1874652716143837_8600414179585541010_o.jpg (1MB, 2048x1759px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x1759px

>>3052477

File: 17807570_1874651956143913_7584802126638908587_o.jpg (262KB, 2048x1517px) Image search: [Google]

262KB, 2048x1517px

>>3052426

>>3052181
lmao the real question is how much did you pay for this shit?

>>3052181

Same thing happened with my wedding photographer.

Booked from out of countrt and reviews/sample photos were nice.

But then they showed up wuth a rebel and kit lens, no flash (in a poorly lit reception hall), and shot jpeg.

I was so mad.

>>3052347

It's not something you should pay for.

>>3052348
the actual fuck that dude might have eye problems if this is what he puts on his website... Also do you have more from the concert?

File: 17505319_1869190506690058_6119180655841558056_o.jpg (209KB, 1655x2048px) Image search: [Google]

209KB, 1655x2048px

>>3052769

File: 17814354_1874652909477151_8233421868863443925_o.jpg (290KB, 2048x1137px) Image search: [Google]

290KB, 2048x1137px

>>3052304

>>3052347
>http://www.sarnehed.se/index.html
Mainly for me it's the processing and facial expression. The background would be good but with a bit more bokeh and remove the fucking boat. Also, portrait orientation.

>>3052732
>and shot jpeg
only on /p/

>>3052351
Agree on the boat and stuff but if he pulled down the highlights you would just get a grey sky. He probably liked the white better.

>>3052732
And the result? Did the manage to deliver pictures you liked?

File: 17310318_1865610587048050_7962350642992336922_o.jpg (418KB, 2048x1904px) Image search: [Google]

418KB, 2048x1904px

>>3052304
just look at it!

File: 17359329_1865004657108643_5264404452940983448_o.jpg (124KB, 1242x2048px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 1242x2048px

>>3052830
"Professional portraits"

File: 17212176_1860433437565765_5648073306575290411_o.jpg (191KB, 1116x2048px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 1116x2048px

>>3052577

>>3052887

No they were terribly.

I think half of them werent even level, the other half were a blurry mess. Managed to not take a bunch of shots too.

Thankfully we had a ceremony in another country too, and those shots were beautiful.

>>3052965
Jesus, the retard even fucked up something as simple as the text font.
It needs the address underneath it because the first name is completely illegible and doesn't even resemble English.

please tell me this is an elaborate post by op

If this are real, then I haven't seen a worse portfolio in my life. There's no self awareness to post such trash as your best pics.

Swedish autistic photographer, nothing to see here

>>3052438
giggled loudly after I saw this

Is there some reason why everyone is slanted?

Like... is standing like a backslash proven to be healthy or some shit?

Is this even American?

Guys I am confused and concerned.

>>3053315
no the tard who shot everything is swedish.

File: 8nrxTJS.gif (4MB, 344x203px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 344x203px

>>3052782

>dat lighting

>>3053315

Maybe he's Dutch

> I have an SLR, therefor I am a professional.

>>3053343
swedish

sarnehed watermark template would be kind of funny desu

>>3053315
>Doesn't know what a .se address it
Found the a American

>>3052969
NUT

>>3053420
Kek and he is selling his pictures for 60$ - 105$ each.

>>3053343
underrated post

>>3053335
>>3053343
>>3053499

Oh my goodness I didn't even look at the website in the watermark I was busy looking at the photo itself I'm clearly an idiot.

File: IMG_7942.jpg (249KB, 2592x1728px) Image search: [Google]

249KB, 2592x1728px

I was recently hired for a show as well. It was dark as hell and I took like a solid four days to get the photos back to them. It was only 40 pictures too so I only charged the dude $45. I'm not as shit as the person op mentioned though

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 7D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.9 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:04 17:08:18
Exposure Time	1/80 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	3200
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	35.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3052969
>when you nut and she keeps sucking
i suppose in /p/'s case
>when you nut and he keeps sucking

>>3055580
It's not terrible, depending on the circumstances and considering the price.

>>3055580
>solid four days
So what, like 8 hours a day for four days + maybe 2 for the show? That's just over $1 per hour my man.

File: IMG_7874.jpg (313KB, 2394x1596px) Image search: [Google]

313KB, 2394x1596px

>>3055596
The whole process of editing photos from one bands set only takes me about two MAYBE three hours. I just had other stuff going on and it took me a while to get around to it.
Show was about an hour long and traveling expenses weren't an issue because they're local.

>>3055590
The venue was basically a bar. I like it there though

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 7D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.9 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:04 15:35:41
Exposure Time	1/125 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	2000
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	16.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

I would pay him. It's your job to research if they're any good before hiring them.

>>3055580
I wouldn't call them shit, especially when put next to this Swede's stuff.
Kind of even has that ~~film feel~~ to it.

>>3053087
I work for a small daily newspaper, and we get shit just like this on almost a daily basis from amateurs and pros alike, many of whom have been photographers for decades. Many just don't understand what's a good photo and what's not.

>>3053343
top kek

>>3052181
This is literally someone buying an entry-level DSLR and thinking "I'm a professional photographer now"

>>3055715
i mean he's getting paid, so technically he is a professional

>>3055605
notbad/10
for $45 I'd say they're definitely good value

>>3055580
I like this shot 45$ is not bad

>>3052181
Tack!
Behövde skratta lite.

File: radflug.jpg (356KB, 1888x1080px) Image search: [Google]

356KB, 1888x1080px

Even the home page pic is a fucking huge red flag dude.
Look at that shit!

>>3052361
not if you want to pass context of the environment

Is he just shooting full auto?

File: auto.jpg (62KB, 398x323px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 398x323px

>>3055781
pretty much

>>3053343

Top post.

What do you guys think about this portfolio?

It's from my ex teacher, i recently found it online and since i'm a rookie i'd like to hear more experienced people's opinion


riojastudie dot jimdo dot com

>>3055876
From a technical standpoint his shots are fine, he seems to lack any real artistic vision though, and there's a few portfolio and graphic design rules I think he should reflect on.


The main one that comes to mind is the whole 'less is more thing'

>>3055876

He's got quite a few really good shots (I really dig that last boudoir photo) mixed in with a lot of mediocre photos. His landscapes portfolio is especially messy. Most of those photos would be considered street photography and/or urban landscapes. Also sports isn't his strong suite, either, but he does have some decent shots there as well.

If he'd delete all the crap, his site would be so much better.

>>3052779

Did someone actually pay money for this photo?

Is it *this* easy to make money as a photographer?

>>3055932

as far as getting paid goes, networking, marketing and footwork are more important than actually being able to take good photos

>>3055773
The context makes no sense though. Maybe if it was at night you'd get more of that ~jazz for your soul~ feel, but I doubt the guy could even get a passable shot at night.

>>3055971
maybe the context is just "I play sax and I'm from this place"

>>3055876
there's a lot of stuff
I'm just lost

File: 17917869_1878867805722328_2809428434166353608_o.jpg (321KB, 2480x1110px) Image search: [Google]

321KB, 2480x1110px

AAaaaaand he is back!

This picture will cost you 89 dollars if you want to buy it!

>>3052426
Bigger than it needs to be

It's fatter than my fucking dick

>>3056878
>volvo
worth

>>3052352
Topkek, at first you would think it's the flower that is the subject but it the 2 glass because the flower is blown out.

>>3052577
Speaking of which, I'm curious to know how much they're charging?

>>3053420
>sarnehed watermark template

Should be a new way we judge photos on here. If it sucks you get the sarnehed watermark.

>>3052324
I kinda love this photo desu.

File: file.png (1MB, 1343x660px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1343x660px

fuck me

>>3055583
>considering this an insult

>>3052181
This thread made my day. Someone is worse than me. YESSSSSS!

>>3052347
That fucking awkward posture.

>>3055670

what is a good photo and what is not?
given the amount of time someone has to react and capture a good angle, even in social events like parties n the sort, how can you judge a fine shot from a bad one?

>>3052340
I know these people

>>3052181

I wonder how many hits this poor guy gets now that he's been shitposted on /p/

>>3058576
I feel sorry for them. Not because you know them but becasue they are on that terrible picture.

>>3057132
somebody get a transparent png of the watermark and share

I was looking for a good photography site to copy for my own and now I have it, thanks lads.

Proof that personality and appearance is 90% and being actually good is just 10%.

>>3058615
I still dont know if he is a troll or not since you cant be this bad on purpose. I mean, doesnt he even look at the pictures he is taking with the camera?

File: Fast-Good-or-Cheap.jpg (85KB, 524x332px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 524x332px

>>3052181
you should pay him 4 times what he asks just because you were stupid enough to hire such a bad photog and expect something good.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	524
Image Height	532
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2013:05:01 09:22:01
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	524
Image Height	332

>>3058691
But what then if you have both?

File: slashpcollage.jpg (841KB, 2980x1991px) Image search: [Google]

841KB, 2980x1991px

At first I kinda felt bad for the guy - I've had gigs (mostly unpaid/voluntary) where /everything had gone wrong, especially with the grain and slow shutter speed to try and cope, but wew.

Feel bad for people investing their time and money in him - clearly it's not a learning experience for him because he's branding it 'professional' and showing it off. Maybe if he was acknowledging it's not great and doing more stuff to learn I'd have more sympathy.

(I'll attached a collage of some pics from a recent job I feel I cocked up on, because why not.)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:19 22:34:46
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2980
Image Height	1991

>>3055580
Cool shot but show us your worst. Dont cherrypick. No photographer is better than their worst photo in a set.

>>3055772

I love this picture. It does the impossible by taking a wide shot and having nothing in focus.

File: babypic.jpg (32KB, 360x360px) Image search: [Google]

32KB, 360x360px

>>3052726
Praying the gay will go away.
>>3052727
Gary Johnson lookalike.
>>3052729
I make people look hideous on purpose. It is the new edgy art
.>>3053198
Could be a rapeugee going into business for themselves with a stolen camera.
>>3053343
I agree could be, but living in Sweden.
Holy hell this makes some of my CL people look like top rank pros. I will stick to my baby photos.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	360
Image Height	360

>>3052348
This cannot be real

>>3059979
bottom right ones a bit too dark no?

>>3059702
There are worse photogs out there getting paid. Some of them have been posted here. I mean +100 clarity shots on the webpages and such.

So I think the saxophone dude is the photographer, since his music tab talks about hiring a saxophonist for events.
God I wonder how he sounds.

>>3052181
Is this the youtube channel?

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7aA8B7QIUQubI1VAMWXxkA

File: 1432354836990.jpg (60KB, 706x706px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 706x706px

>>3060166
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OsiaUsItpaY
My dude needs to work on his embouchure.

>>3060175
I could understand people talking and not paying attention but you have random assholes walking in the backstage, WTF man?

File: 17880615_1881718132103962_3889909232853806728_o.jpg (285KB, 2048x1365px) Image search: [Google]

285KB, 2048x1365px

>>3060029

File: 17967028_1881718145437294_7321133313710824191_o.jpg (168KB, 2048x1365px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 2048x1365px

>>3060055

File: 17917152_1881716678770774_4663108408551042166_o.jpg (384KB, 2048x1365px) Image search: [Google]

384KB, 2048x1365px

>>3059979

>>3060364
why would someone share that image

>>3060656
why would someone watermark it?

>>3060660
why would someone not delete it and themselves?

>>3060656
the sad part is that someone actually paid for that picture.

>>3060364
I mean that someone hired the photographer and had to pay for all his shitty pictures.

>>3060688
Seems to me that a lot of people hire him, even OP who obviously thinks it's shit work

>>3060690
He must've read the art of the deal.

>>3060364
At least the focus looks correct on this one.

This thread is the gift that keeps on giving.

>>3052347
The problem is a guy like you who bought his first camera 2 weeks ago could of taken this picture. Literally just point and click without regard for proper settings or a better composition.

>>3052340
L
O
L

>>3052348
Duh. Hope it was a cheap lesson to be learned. DO YOUR RESEARCH. Look into the portfolios of the people you hire it should be very apparent even to someone unfamiliar with the industry if they produce quality product. This guy has so many red flags you'd think he was celebrating Chinese new year.

>>3056018
I play sax I'm from this place and I hire shit photographers. Let's not try and excuse how shit the composition of that photo is.. the guy could have stood like 10 feet to the left and solved so many problems.

>>3052352
What the actual fuck is going on in this thread.. this nigga can't be for real.. please tell me what he charged

>>3052348

Looks kind of like a klan rally if you squint your eyes

>>3055876
Yeah I'm confused why he seemingly mixes in some horribly blurry out of focus snapshits in with some actually decent shots.. I just can't give that much creative license to post literal color blobs and call them photos, he's certainly capable of creating some nice shots tho.

>>3060999

trips confirm

>>3052727

>mfw opening /p/ and 5 sony troll threads on the first page

>>3053661
Correct, you are.

>>3052348

>1/16th of the image is a watermark

If I was this dude, I wouldn't advertise my website with that image

>>3052732

>not letting your cousin or little brother shoot family events

your fault for trusting a stranger desu

>>3061120
i dunno about you man, but when my oldest brother got married, they hired a really good photographer to do the shots. I was just starting out, and I knew that I wasn't good enough to do a whole wedding, let alone with my kit at the time. Three years later and I am going to do my other brother's wedding. They are going cheap, and well I am cheap

>>3061148
Even just starting out I hope you took the wedding as an opportunity to still get some practice. Even if only 2 out of every 200 photos you took was worth while it'd still be nice to have gotten a view the protog didn't catch

>>3061150
well I was a groomsman, and drunk, so I was not doing photos. the photographer did get a good photo of me licking a plate clean while I was drunk

>>3061156
Fair point lol

Don't forget that art is subjective and this is HIS artistic style.

File: Sarnehed.png (96KB, 2000x2000px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 2000x2000px

Should be large enough for all your needs.

And yes, his web address really is separated by spaces and is that off balance to the right. He also uses two fonts for the web address, both stock photoshop. Sylfaen for "w w w ." and Javanese Text for "s a r n e h e d . s e"

>>3061189
>HIS autistic style

There is creative license and there's learning how to fucking focus.

>>3061197
Thanks

>>3061324

File: batman.gif (953KB, 300x223px) Image search: [Google]

953KB, 300x223px

>>3060999
Your trips actually made me look at it, and squint. Did not see a klan rally. Also it did not help the pic either.

File: IMG_2179.jpg (273KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

273KB, 800x600px

>>3060364

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	800
Image Height	600
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: IMG_1882.png (217KB, 327x316px) Image search: [Google]

217KB, 327x316px

>>3060364
I can't stop fucking laughing at this. Thanks /p/ ahahahahahahah omg

File: DSC_0221.jpg (1MB, 6000x4000px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 6000x4000px

I've only taking pics for money once. I was scared shitless about my pictures not being good enough and having my nonexistent reputation ruined. I got paid 80$. Here's a pic from the shoot. How'd I do? Is this kind of quality worth 80$?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D3300
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1.1 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.8
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	816
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	60 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:21 17:37:40
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Fine Weather
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	40.00 mm
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>3061406
I wish I had this thread to ease my fears and boost my confidence then.

>>3061406
Resize your shit next time dude, but if that's what the clients wanted it looks fine. I'm guessing you didn't have the equipment to use a larger aperture though

>>3061410
Oh shit you're right. Had a setting left over from a previous image.

>>3053343
Made my fucking day.

>>3061327
lel, I hope this kicks off.

>>3052181
Go home

instagram.com/sarnehedmusicandphoto/

This is the funniest thread I've seen on /p/. Seriously, this lad needs to be tarred and feathered, he is monstrously bad.

File: file.png (564KB, 997x629px) Image search: [Google]

564KB, 997x629px

haha

File: file.png (354KB, 1053x539px) Image search: [Google]

354KB, 1053x539px

What the fuck.

File: 1488557195621.jpg (64KB, 400x519px) Image search: [Google]

64KB, 400x519px

>>3052181
>.se
Ah, yes the land of people with identity careers.
Leftist cucks pursuing careers that are hip and trendy despite having no skill of the trade.
Later at the Club Deviant they'll tell all the horny roasties about what a trendy photographer they are in a poor effort to hide the fact that they are a nu-male beta cucks.

Man, do I hate Sweden...

File: 1491480446021.jpg (81KB, 353x473px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 353x473px

>>3052727

>>3060363
Is this real?

File: 1407362522701.jpg (38KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 500x375px

I've been photographing for a few weeks now and I still haven't even added any pictures to the Instagram account that I created for this hobby for fear of my shitty beginner snapshots ruining my future shots.
How the fuck is this guy daring enough to put a giant watermark and his website address on these photos?

>>3062186

Because he lives in the real world and not 4chan beta land.

i.e. he is a normal, rational person. You are insecure and a loser.

>>3062195
this

>>3062195
>marketing your services with shit portfolio
>rational

>>3062179
And here I was thinking that my photos were bad, but man this is some kind of next level shit.

File: 1492316381843.jpg (53KB, 474x595px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 474x595px

>>3052438

File: 16487728_1843718842570558_922700905198340707_o.jpg (169KB, 2048x1365px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 2048x1365px

>>3062240

>>3063168
lmao it can't possibly get better than this

>>3063178
just look at the dudes website, Facebook and/or instagram and you will find even worse pictures he has put his watermark on.

>>3060363
this is one of the best trolls i've seen in a long time.

and he makes money with this shit.

its fucking genius.

File: 1484933790753.gif (3MB, 377x372px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 377x372px

>>3063168
he's going for genuine expressions

>>3060000
>Nothing in focus
He did a great job at keeping the text in focus

>>3063193
I'm thinking, maybe he's from the beatnik part of Sweden.

File: 1491429641243.jpg (3MB, 5472x3648px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 5472x3648px

>>3052324
fixed it

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 70D
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:25 14:45:06
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/3.5
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	5472
Image Height	3648
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3059997
>No photographer is better than their worst photo in a set.
Actually a photographer is no better than their best photo, right?

>>3063651
Their worst photo is the indication of what they tolerate. Photographers take an endless stream of shitty pictures, but would only share the work they feel is worth sharing. If they are willing to share shit, they feel okay that their work would be judged as shit.

>>3063726
I see what you mean now. I thought you meant the worst picture of their taken pictures, not their shared pictures.But yeah, I agree with you.

>>3060994
he wanted 200 sek/pic which is around 24 dollars/picture.

File: 16992103_1857014591240983_4833023759165261804_o.jpg (107KB, 1080x928px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 1080x928px

>>3064546
I wouldnt have paid 24 dollars for this picuture but apparently there are people who are willing to do that.

File: 16508574_1846142035661572_5207258053307410731_n.jpg (75KB, 750x565px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 750x565px

>>3057892
there is a even worse picture of that picture..

>>3052181
i don't get why you aren't paying him double

>>3052181
>hire someone for their advertised service
>they deliver a product with the same quality than what they are advertising
>throw a tantrum and refuse to pay
As bad as the pictures may be you are being a little cunt.

>>3055605
What lens did you use for this? A 16-35mm 2.8? I shot an event in poor lighting with a 18-140mm 3.5-5.6 today and I hate how it turned out so I'm considering getting a 24-105mm 2.8 for future use

>>3059979
Some problems with your exposure.

>>3064549
this is art man. people apparently pay him to insult them.

>>3060000
underrated

>>3064808
Thanks man! :)

File: 17494059_277774629331422_7582565848267620352_n.jpg (55KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 640x640px

His camera.

>>3064808
He claims to have "high-quality photos and a professional approach". This is a lie.

File: 17523059_10202945986087451_4095120308463878719_n.jpg (91KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 960x960px

Oh dear god he's using a 7D.

>>3064990
7D Mark II. Pretty nice camera but too bad he cant use it.

>>3055724
ACTCHUALLY

The straight definition for a professional is to "profess" if he does anything else than talking he is not a professional. If people reach him for a particular product, then he is not professing, he is creating, manufacturing, etc. Of course professionalism is associated to some traits, that you might have even if you are not a professional. Like responsibility for example.

Now if we go for the meme definition of professional (earning money for your job) he isnt a professional anyways, since it needs 50% of your monthly income to come from photographs to be called semipro and at least 75% to be a pro.

And trust me, this guys works at a factory or some shitty job, scamming retards like OP is a hobby.

>>3056878
At first glance I thought he took a photo of a car with a flat.

>>3062186
You can always delete that old shit. Its what I do. Once I progress I delete the older the shit. Perfect crime.

>>3064989
>manual mode
/p/ approved. Let's end this episode of noobs bashing noobs!

>>3060000
Fuck you! You made me spit my bear on my laptop. Now I have to clean that shot up

>>3064990
Probably rented it.

>>3065099

Y... yeah?

>>3052782
Holy fuck i think i know the guy to the left. Where in sweden is this taken?

>>3063168
I want to hire this guy

>>3064990
>mounted on monopod with the battery grip
>not on the lens mount

r e e
e
e

>>3061197

topkek

>>3065431
Me too, thanks

>>3062213

In real life confidence and networking goes a long way, and regular people aren't hobbyists who care that much about quality.

Being afraid of putting your photos online is dumb, you can use a handle while you improve your skills and market yourself later.

>>3064990

What the fuck, how is nothing in focus?

Everyone can laugh at him but he gets paid desu, that should open up your eyes and make you want to put your shit out there.

>>3067645
Get the fuck off my board redditcunt

File: 18238029_1889159901359785_8569946380503385005_o.jpg (162KB, 1140x2048px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 1140x2048px

>>3067763
huehuehhue

>>3067845
I've been on /p/ and 4chan since you were shitting green

File: 1491429641243.jpg (175KB, 1080x720px) Image search: [Google]

175KB, 1080x720px

>>3052347
I would have moved a bit to the right to the boat wasn't poking him in the back, opened the aperture to soften the background, thenbring up the shutter speed to darken everything. If that makes the subject too dark then I would use a flash.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 70D
Camera Software	Polarr Photo Editor
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Created	2016:05:01 23:50:41
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/3.5
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1080
Image Height	720
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3064550
Honestly, photo-wise, that's the least offensive one I've seen. But with the text on top tho.......

>>3068211
Wow you made it a less bad

>>3068288
At that resolution it's fine, but once you see it blown up on the home page then you can see how out of focus it is.

>>3060363
What the actual fuck?

>>3068411
And I have no idea why you share that picture online and put your watermark on it becasue its not even a good nor a funny picture.

>>3070630
i'd say it's pretty funny

I took some photos of a gig a few months ago, critique these please

File: 50c27e48362131.589628088e25a.jpg (168KB, 1400x975px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 1400x975px

>>3070684

;_;

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 1200D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.8 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.7
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:02:04 19:13:36
Exposure Time	1/100 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Not Defined
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	55.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: f863c648362131.5895f734540cb.jpg (337KB, 1400x932px) Image search: [Google]

337KB, 1400x932px

>>3070684

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 1200D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.8 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.7
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:02:04 15:37:40
Exposure Time	1/80 sec
F-Number	f/5.6
Exposure Program	Not Defined
ISO Speed Rating	2000
Lens Aperture	f/5.6
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	53.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3052187
Learn your fonts, fucking cuck

>>3052340
Enough cringe for today

>>3056878
Ok, I need to up my prices.

>>3061410
>Resize your shit next time

Who gives a shit?

>>3070685
>When the crowd doesn't know you shit your pants but you can feel the warmth.

>>3071083

haha init

File: 18238887_1891203991155376_8968563309966639953_o.jpg (572KB, 1467x2048px) Image search: [Google]

572KB, 1467x2048px

Hahaha my sides!

>>3072327
this guy is the gift that keeps on giving holy shit

>>3062176
>>3062177
Wow.
All this time I thought he was taking phone pics.

>>3072327
haha this watermark... next, we'll see a guy vomiting on the floor on all fours....brought to you by...Tarnehead? Sadner herd? wtf is this shit....

File: 1459322955211.jpg (27KB, 228x260px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 228x260px

>>3072327

>>3072327
his style of photography is so consistent

I wonder if this is actually what he's going for.

>>3062180
back to /pol/, cuck

>>3072765
You can't spell /pol/ without /p/ anon. And photography is the art discipline most closely tied with politics, too.

>>3072945
>photography
>art


Boy do I have news for you Mohammed

File: Mikael-Ekvall1[1].jpg (323KB, 1760x1181px) Image search: [Google]

323KB, 1760x1181px

>>3052965
From the thumb I thought it was pic related at first, and that one still has less shit in it.

>>3072973
/g/ pls go

>>3052726
Is the photo focused on that womans arm?

>>3072981
>/g/
>Mohammed
No Pajeet my son

>>3063189
Gonna follow him on insta

File: Screenshot_20170511-150225.png (858KB, 1080x1920px) Image search: [Google]

858KB, 1080x1920px

Black font on dark background

SWEDEN YES

>>3052324
Tell me masters of photo, what is wrong with this?
it's average and need to correct the inclination

so what is so baaaaaaaaaaaad

I bet this guy enjoy more photography than all the autistic so deep shy fags of /p/

>>3057892
Lord almighty why the fuck

>>3070686
like a gorilla in the zoo

>>3074352

Already answered, read the fucking thread

File: 18238185_1891205264488582_648395397357775488_o.jpg (593KB, 2048x1512px) Image search: [Google]

593KB, 2048x1512px

>>3074360

>>3072327
>>3074364
>>3074364
lmfao jesus christ this is beautiful
this man is the king of /p/

File: giphy-downsized.gif (2MB, 320x240px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 320x240px

>>3060362

File: 18278605_1891203841155391_3071299941312869889_o.jpg (601KB, 2048x1584px) Image search: [Google]

601KB, 2048x1584px

>>3074433
:)

>>3074470
How much does it cost to have a website made. I'm gonna quit my job and become a pro.

>>3058576
>>3058616
I feel sorry for them because you know them.

>>3052967
"I'm not really sure what to do with my hands?"

>>3074360
>>3074364
MY SIDES

>>3074480
You need a website. With wix, you can do it on your own.

This thread is proof that we're all gonna make it, /p/.

>>3064549
Apparently I need to move to Sweden. If this is high brow work, then I will be swimming in cash, and groupies.
>>3074364
>>3074360
This guy is the regular stud muffin of the ball.
Well the downy girl is in better focus than most of his other photos.

bumping for lord sarnehed

This is the /p/ I like to see; all of us no matter how good or bad we are, laughing at the mediocrity that are normies who can't take a decent photo and pass themselves off as "pros" and end up getting some of the most kek-worthy shots that they eventually pass off as being serious.

Fucking love it.

>>3059997
Are you Sarnehed?

File: 00H0H_gsFq1Fcq4zq_600x450.jpg (38KB, 600x448px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 600x448px

>>3052195
I love craigslist photographers. best of the best. like this guy: https://vermont.craigslist.org/crs/6111330757.html

File: 52a5e9651b548.jpg (458KB, 600x556px) Image search: [Google]

458KB, 600x556px

>>3077641
his photoshop work is fucking glorious. http://www.modelmayhem.com/portfolio/2555922/viewall

File: lol.jpg (21KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 400x300px

>>3077642

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Google
Image-Specific Properties:

this thread is brilliant.

also the guy has quite the skill to get that super realistic in your face uglyness. i did clubs for a while and even in times when i was bored and just pointed the camera and sprayed without even looking, i never got photos like that.

>>3074428
This man has gone from object of mockery on /p/ to being admired for all its persistent misery on /p/, and all it took was dogged consistency of style, however terrible it may be.

>>3077642
Strangely this looks very Heavy Metal. The comics series.

>>3052181
you hired him, your fault for not doing the research

File: 18238173_1891205164488592_4368922966240067024_o.jpg (369KB, 2048x1365px) Image search: [Google]

369KB, 2048x1365px

>>3077657

>>3078208
Hahah this is getting better (worse)

File: 14859689_1794463364162773_6626694077573292338_o.jpg (136KB, 2048x1365px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 2048x1365px

>>3078210
it sure is

it's kind of amazing how he can turn any event/group of people into something that looks like a tim and eric sketch

>>3078261
it's like someone pays him to make people look ugly.

>>3062179
Does he have glaucoma?

>>3062195
>he is a normal, rational person.
normal rational people don't go into professional photography with zero skill, anon

>>3078221
why would someone even put their watermark on this?

>>3079892
That question applies to literally every photo ITT

>>3052347
hey there Sarnehed

>>3078208
That conehead...he's like "mmm i'm gonna get in dat pussy toniiiight".....or not.

>>3052181
Looks like a shred video...

Bump for the king of /p/

It seems that Jason Lanier has a strong challenger

>>3081944
It's one of the best lol threads lately

>>3052477
AT LEAST I STILL GET PAID YOU SAD INTERNET GOBLIN. I UNDERSTAND THIS PLACE WAS THE DARK NET. BUT MY GOD YOU'RE PURE ER EBIL!!!!! CLOSE THIS DISCUSSION OR I'LL GET THE INTERNET POLICE TO SHUT IT DOWN!!!! THIS IS HARASSMENT I AM AN HONEST MAN

File: 1480462286262.jpg (11KB, 500x265px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 500x265px

>>3083053
(you)

File: idiotonrye.gif (1MB, 500x281px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 500x281px

>>3083053
LOL! This thread just keeps on giving.

File: ToOurFriend.jpg (155KB, 750x571px) Image search: [Google]

155KB, 750x571px

Sent :^)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:25 17:19:45
Comment	Screenshot
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	750
Image Height	571
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3083053
We'll need a photo of this demand.

Good luck with that.

>>3052319
One on top of page is ok but holy fuck the one on the bottom lol

If he makes a consistent style out of this he may be up for something. In a world where event photography has a standarized look and everything tries to look unrealisticaly perfect and happy, these kind of photos have more of a documentary value

Is this a fucking joke? None of his shit is even in focus lmao

>>3083053
>4chan is the darknet
shi-iiiiit haha haha hahahaha!

>>3074470
>>3074364
The only thing I give him is that the subjects aren't too good looking. I would not have fun shooting them. Sorry. I'm an ass.

>>3078208

This picture .....

File: muhamad .jpg (354KB, 667x1000px) Image search: [Google]

354KB, 667x1000px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS-1D X Mark II
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	667
Image Height	1000
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:05:26 23:09:17
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
F-Number	f/6.3
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	250
Lens Aperture	f/6.3
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	24.00 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	667
Image Height	1000
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard