Thread replies: 6
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2
File: mouse_lead_presets.jpg (66KB, 400x267px) Image search:
[Google]
66KB, 400x267px
>Your Reliance on Presets is Going to Cost You Your Job!
I happen to agree with him for the most part.. That said, I make a living photographing Real Estate (something that I do NOT think will be a viable career in the next 10 years) due to tech advancements.
So all that said, if he is correct.. What areas of Photography will stay strong? I do not live in a big enough city to transition into commercial Architecture, so I will have to gradually transition into another area of photography if I want my career to continue.
My feeling is that it will come down to areas of photography that require other advanced skills (be it elaborate lighting knowledge or high end retouching skills). What areas of phtgraphy would you bet on being strong in the next 5 years? What about 10?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mAucOu0HbTw
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1920 Image Height 1080 Number of Bits Per Component 8, 8, 8 Pixel Composition RGB Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2017:03:29 23:58:35 Color Space Information Uncalibrated Image Width 1000 Image Height 664
>>
GET GET GET GET GOT GOT GOT GOT
>>
I think your shift key is broken.
All he's saying is don't use fuckin' vsco, my dude, and he's right. It's pretty appalling how many commercial photographers squeak by with another person's aesthetic.
Also, stop watching youtube photography videos. Just because they made a video doesn't make them an authority.
>>
>>3049406
I dont use filters (apart from the 1 time where I had 1 client request her property images to look like they had an instagram filter on them.....).
But lets be honest, if an iphone could HDR merge an interior photo 95% of real estate photographers would go oout f business, Why? Not because HDR merge is good (its fucking shit) but its passable and if an agent can take a passable image by themselves then why would they pay a photographer to take a photo that they think isnt much better than there own.
>>
File: 1389333317458.jpg (64KB, 500x375px) Image search:
[Google]
64KB, 500x375px
>>3049417
>>3049403
>in real estate photography
>thinking its about the camera
real estate is 70% lighting 30% cleaning up the place to look good
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make SAMSUNG Camera Model SGH-A887 Camera Software A887UCIJ1-0000000000 Image-Specific Properties: Image Width 1280 Image Height 960 Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi F-Number f/2.8 Exposure Program Aperture Priority Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Flash No Flash Focal Length 3.72 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1280 Image Height 960 Rendering Custom Exposure Mode Auto White Balance Auto
>>
>>3049456
Don't forget using a ridiculous wide angle lens to make the broom closet look like a very spherical aeroplane hangar
Thread posts: 6
Thread images: 2
Thread images: 2