Thread replies: 7
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: P1090018.jpg (154KB, 1000x750px) Image search:
[Google]
154KB, 1000x750px
Do you have a recognisable attribute or signature in your photos to make it recognisably yours?
How bad an idea is it for my to leave my camera on +1 step exposure for a more distinctive look?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make OLYMPUS CORPORATION Camera Model PEN-F Camera Software Windows Photo Editor 10.0.10011.16384 Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.8 Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Horizontal Resolution 350 dpi Vertical Resolution 350 dpi Image Created 2017:01:09 20:17:04 Exposure Time 1/60 sec F-Number f/1.8 Exposure Program Normal Program ISO Speed Rating 1000 Exposure Bias -1 EV Metering Mode Pattern Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 25.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Image Width 1000 Image Height 750 Rendering Custom Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control High Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal
>>
>>3049032
Content is primary, look is secondary, technical stuff is tertiary
>>
>>3049039
This
Forcing a style just because you want to have a style is kinda backwards imo
If you do have a style that's specific and recognizable it will eventually show throughout your body of work. The whole point of it is to be natural
Why would you force it in the first place? If you want so bad to be recognized just throw a watermark on it
>>
>>3049032
repetition will take you there.
>>
I did, but then I eventually felt like I was repeating myself and got bored. So I stopped.
>>
>>3049032
i think i recognise this, where is it?
>>
>>3049032
easier to correct for underexposure than over. it would also be a very poor criterion by which one would define a style.
Thread posts: 7
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1