how did he do this? Are my guesses correct? - dark background

>>3046887
to add, maybe the paint was colored powder

>>3046887
fluorescent paint

>>3046887
fluorescent paint, black light to the face, flash and f/1.2 or faster lens.

>>3046887
I don't wanna sound like an ass but look at her pupils it looks like the lighting is based on natural light from a window?
If not i do agree with the rest of the folks in this thread.

>>3047087

It doesn't take a whole lot of energy to make the paint fluoresce. Remember, it's literally emitting light, not reflecting it.

>>3046895
This ain't f1,2. Its f1,8

fluorescent paint is right, but don't do this. it looks bad. maybe with a better edit it would be ok. the paint pulls you away from the eyes.

>>3046887
the paint is a projector.

>>3047242

Lmao

That's the semen of 4 different clowns.

>>3047242
Go outside and look at people's eyes more, they're really not that interesting

>>3047248
It could be a nice idea but look a the skin texture

>>3046888
source?

File: s_83.jpg (334KB, 1024x684px) Image search: [Google]

334KB, 1024x684px

It's not paint, it is some coloured powder they use at `holi colours festival`.
Some black light as well and a fast lens.

>img
the same shit but at a holi festival and not a well done portrait

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D600
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2017 (Macintosh)
Photographer	E. Chiereguini
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	966
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	80 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	6016
Image Height	4016
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:07 12:09:28
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	1600
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	80.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1024
Image Height	684
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	High Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>3053322

My man, there are brush strokes in op's photo. It's clearly paint. You can buy a six pack of uv glow body paint for $13 on amazon, it's not exotic or hard-to-find stuff.

>>3053330
you clearly don't know that powder. It sticky as fuck. You can brush it whatever your taste.

File: 17268024_424164074597835_1995977405323280384_n.jpg (169KB, 1080x1349px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 1080x1349px

>>3053308
I'm still here! I found it on this guy's Instagram:

https://www.instagram.com/kai.boet/

Or maybe just maybe the photographer used regular paint but in post tweaked with the luminesce of the colours since they are different to the models face?

File: retouched.jpg (223KB, 1080x1350px) Image search: [Google]

223KB, 1080x1350px

i dont know why peo[le take cool pixs and they dont spend one minute on ps

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.0 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:09 14:33:23

>>3046887
fuck how do I get that sharp of an image, I mean damn son that's pretty

>>3054343
Nail the focus, like really hit that pinhead with one of those giant fantasy warhammers

>>3054332
the photographer did spend a lot of time on photoshop on the original. He changed the hues of the paint and other adjustments. He posted a before and after to his instagram story

>>3054355
my bad..i saw that gaze layer on the original and that the eyes where left untouched that i took it upon myself to enhance it a bit more.
plus i like high contrast and bold colors.
matter of taste i guess.

File: 2.jpg (310KB, 976x611px) Image search: [Google]

310KB, 976x611px

see the difference?
those eyes had to be enhanced

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	497
Image Height	616
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:04:09 16:15:23
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	976
Image Height	611

>>3054373

Looks 10000x better wow you have great taste. Really reminds me of gollum but like a sexy gollum.

>>3054426
i just felt that it had more potential...and it did

>>3054444

Well you made it yours, man. Really makes you think.

What else could be fixed by adding more contrast and saturation and then mentioning how something was enhanced?

>>3054458
here is what i did..whiten the eyeballs enhanced the iris.
brought up the aqua and orange channels, more highlights and contrast,bit more of exposure,sharpened the edges,and of course a tad of saturation

>>3054473

oh shit did you just use the enhance filter my man

>subtle keks

>>3054481
oh yeah you are right..would ve saved some time..damn,what would the world be with out people like you...thank you brah! i ll remember to use the easy app next time,my man always looking out for the bros

I'm new here, is everyone being sarcastic?

you cant be a normie here you are in 4chan, dont forget

File: q52H07K.jpg (855KB, 2000x1317px) Image search: [Google]

855KB, 2000x1317px

Take a look at the reflection in her eyes and you'll see a Ultra Violet lamp. These are extremely dangerous to view directly so don't dick around with them... especially the shortwave UV lamps. But you can see that this is how the photographer achieved this effect. The camera is more sensitive to the UV paint when it reacts to the lamp... more so than the human eye.

Hope this helps.

>>3047258
underrated

>>3055326
you can also tell by the green teeth and eyes

>>3054486
Are you really that stupid?

>>3054373
fuck no

>>3046895
not to sound retarded, but why would a fast lens even matter here? to eliminate as much additional light as possible?

>>3060822
to get all that out of focus shit

>>3046887
All that effort in the lighting, with the face paint, nailing focus and post processing.

Still leaves his reflection in the eye.

When will these Protogcucks learn?

Embarrassing.

>>3061798
it's only your autism that's triggered by it

true that he could've chosen lighting with a more circular eye reflection, but laypeople never notice stuff like that

>>3061799
Not even a lighting change. Like 10 mintues of photoshop could mask/paint that shit out.

Its just a smear on a great portrait.

>>3054332
That looks like shit, you overbaked the fuck out of an already overbaked image.