What kind of post processing is used to achieve this look? I've

>>3044741
>vsco
Kill yourself my man

File: 20150804-L1020288.jpg (826KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

826KB, 1200x800px

>>3044741
This guy seriously has the most subdued, classy smooth post processing I've ever seen

It doesn't have that digital flatness but it doesn't look like the faux-film look you get straight out of the box with most VSCO/RNI presets

I can't nail it no matter how much I try

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	LEICA CAMERA AG
Camera Model	LEICA Q (Typ 116)
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1.1 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2015:09:07 19:50:51
Exposure Time	1/640 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	1 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	28.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Soft
Saturation	Low
Sharpness	Hard

>>3044741
>I've gone through literally every single VSCO preset and can't nail it

Shit maaaan, there is nothing else you can do here, it is encrypted.

>>3044743
In my defense I just torrented them

>>3044746
Ignore the VSCO part

>>3044750

I cannot ignore that you did zero research further then trying some one button options.

Use RawTherapee or Darktable instead.

>>3044756
>Use RawTherapee or Darktable instead.

He used Lightroom tho

>>3044756
>one button options
Are you thinking of the mobile app?

File: 14582326_201308296987525_8145175434120658944_n[1].jpg (120KB, 750x937px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 750x937px

Okay, I'm not op but I have a question

How do I get this cold but cozy effect?

>>3044767
I really feel like it's a running gag at this point to come to /p/ and ask how to raise the black levels.

>>3044769
I'm a noob, chill I don't wanna use that photo effect free shit- I wanna do it manual

>>3044741
What
>>3044744
Is
>>3044773
Leica

>>3044775
Yeah I know these were shot with a Leica Q, but the SOOC jpegs are dull and flat, he heavily post processes all his shots

>>3044763
Noob here, I've been editing my raw in LR. Any standout reason why people prefer other programs? Haven't looked into the options.

File: FullSizeRender 15.jpg (909KB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

909KB, 3264x2448px

isn't it just low saturation and lowered blacks (fade)?

>>3044788
Most people use it because they use other programs in the Adobe suite. I do graphic design as well so Lightroom comes in my CC package

File: 20150804-L1020255.jpg (671KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

671KB, 1200x800px

OP, the blacks aren't really lifted on these, I can't figure out how to get the tones so even, either.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	LEICA CAMERA AG
Camera Model	LEICA Q (Typ 116)
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1.1 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	35 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2015:09:07 18:28:41
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/2.8
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	500
Lens Aperture	f/2.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	28.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
White Balance	Auto
Digital Zoom Ratio	1.2
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Soft
Saturation	Low
Sharpness	Hard

File: download.jpg (1016KB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

1016KB, 1200x800px

I think desaturating at least a little bit must be part of it?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	LEICA CAMERA AG
Camera Model	LEICA Q (Typ 116)
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1.1 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	50 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2015:09:07 18:24:17
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/1.7
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	640
Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	28.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
White Balance	Auto
Digital Zoom Ratio	1.8
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Soft
Saturation	Low
Sharpness	Hard

File: download (4).jpg (2MB, 1200x800px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1200x800px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	LEICA CAMERA AG
Camera Model	LEICA Q (Typ 116)
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.1.1 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2015:09:07 18:34:26
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/1.7
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	125
Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Exposure Bias	-0.3 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	28.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Soft
Saturation	Low
Sharpness	Hard

>>3044883
low saturation, high contrast and lifted blacks

perhaps some fiddling around with the yellow

>>3044908
He definitely didn't raise the blacks, they're nice and crisp

>>3044908
Checking histograms, blacks aren't up at all.

>>3044769
Basically every time someone posts a picture on /p/ and asks how to achieve that look, the correct answer is either

a) crush the blacks, or
b) lift the blacks

>>3045341
Heyyy turns out it's more complex than that in at least this case.

>>3044767
This is looks to me like lab scans of underexposed negative film. Meaning that the scans were over-sharpened and they tried to digitally brighten the image at least 2 stops.

>>3044883
you're right in that none of the colors in these images violate sRGB. color bleeding by pushing up contrast kills smooth tonality.
try doing ctr-shift-y to see a clipping mask in photoshop based on your selected color space (which should be srgb)
take any colors that clip and manually brush them down.
enjoy smooth tones and rich dark colors

>>3044882
>>3044883
These look amazing

Here's some more from him:
http://www.minimallyminimal.com/blog/leica-t
http://www.minimallyminimal.com/blog/leica-t-extended-review

I tried to contact him about his post procesing but never got a reply.

File: 2017-03-25 05.28.47 1.jpg (4MB, 4608x2592px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 4608x2592px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	XT1635-01
Camera Software	VSCO Android Version
Equipment Make	motorola
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2017:03:19 22:01:55
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Geodetic Survey Data	WGS-84
Color Space Information	sRGB
F-Number	f/2.0
Focal Length	4.68 mm
Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Exposure Mode	Auto
Image Height	2592
Rendering	Normal
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Saturation	Low
Exposure Program	Normal Program
Sharpness	Soft
White Balance	Auto
Image Width	4608
Metering Mode	Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Contrast	Normal
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Brightness	Unknown
ISO Speed Rating	1250
Exposure Time	1/15 sec

>>3046732
What is this trash?

>>3048219
follow me on Instagram

>>3044741
shit white balance, underexposed kind of post processing

>>3044744
>I've ever seen
you haven't seen a lot