Why was Kodachrome so good? Any chances that it gets revived

>>3042453
Big part of the appeal is the era when those pictures were taken.

>>3042454
lol, that sounds retarded. says who, by the way?

>>3042463

Says me bitch suck my dick

File: 1423927746812.gif (4MB, 406x339px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 406x339px

>dem smooth ass browns/dark reds

>>3042468

Jontron thinks that rich browns and dark reds commit a disproportionate amount of crimes tho

>>3042454
yeah back when america was great. Maybe Trump will make film great again

File: bg0063_1a34668v_enlarge.jpg (121KB, 725x962px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 725x962px

Kodachrome, for all intents and purposes, was a sub-par film that should have been long forgotten with the advent of better emulsions. The Kodachrome "look" was caused not by the film's emulsion but the fact that a lot of photos were taken on 120, 4x5, or 8x10. 35mm Kodachrome lacks that look, and just looks like shitty budget film.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS3 Windows
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	1491 dpi
Vertical Resolution	1491 dpi
Image Created	2009:05:11 10:25:23
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	725
Image Height	962

File: jeunefilleafghane11.jpg (216KB, 1125x1688px) Image search: [Google]

216KB, 1125x1688px

>>3042498
The Afghan Girl (Sharbat Gula) - 1984
Nikon FM2, Kodachrome 64

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS5 Macintosh
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2011-09-14T16:02:06-04:00
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1125
Image Height	1688

File: william-eggleston-memphis-c-1969-71-women-sitting.jpg (96KB, 423x640px) Image search: [Google]

96KB, 423x640px

>>3042498
>35mm Kodachrome lacks that look, and just looks like shitty budget film.
but thats wrong you piece of shit.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Google
Image-Specific Properties:

File: saul-leiter-big.jpg (490KB, 1150x507px) Image search: [Google]

490KB, 1150x507px

>>3042498
so wrong

>>3042505
Why can't women look this beautiful anymore fuck

America does need higher beauty standards

File: 00036f47_medium.jpg (76KB, 639x423px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 639x423px

Kyaiktiyo, Burma, 1978. The Golden Rock at Shwe Pyi Daw (the Golden Country), the Buddhist holy place. Hiroji Kubota writes: “I was desperate to keep a distance from America for a while; luckily, I found Burma and its gentle and compassionate people.

In the spring of 1978, on the top of the hill where I took this photo, I had two Leica bodies: the one with Tri-X and the other with Kodachrome 64. Soon after, I realised that the colour one looked very colourful and was more powerful. That was my decisive moment, to become a colour photographer”. (Photo by Hiroji Kubota/Magnum Photos)

>>3042507

...he says, cheeto crumbs in his neckbeard, pert man titties straining his mustard stained minecraft shirt

>>3042513
t. not an alt right /pol/tard

File: lololol.jpg (201KB, 450x649px) Image search: [Google]

201KB, 450x649px

>>3042512
meanwhile, in digiland. this one was done with a 5D mkiii.

>>3042507
Women do, you're just not looking in the right places. You have this perception that ALL women looked like that, when it was only the attractive ones that were worth the film.

>>3042516
most women these days didnt have dumb tattoos or piercings, or retarded ear expansions. they could be attractive without trying to look ghetto or like they came from some backwards african tribe.

I have a roll of Kodak elite chrome 200 that expired in 2012 that im about to use. What should i expect?

>>3042526
snapshits.

>>3042527
(You)

>>3042527

Lmao

>>3042526
I have one that was inside my uncle's F3 since the 00's should I develop it or its probably bad?

>>3042515
:(........

>>3042474
>that trip

subtle

>>3042519
Stop hanging around the bottom 50% of society.

File: 06.jpg (481KB, 900x1103px) Image search: [Google]

481KB, 900x1103px

pavelkosenko.wordpress.com/2012/03/28/4x5-kodachromes/

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS3 Windows
Photographer	Shorpy.com
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	1800 dpi
Vertical Resolution	1800 dpi
Image Created	2011-04-17T11:56:12+04:00
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	900
Image Height	1103

Right now cinestill is a film that has nice unique colors.

Kodachrome wasn't good and was easily bested by Ektachrome...which IS coming back.

>>3043047
the only good ekta was e100g. and that shit aint coming back. they are making a ""e100"" generic ektachrome for dummies who dont know better.

>>3042465
Edgy as fuck.

>>3042454
first post best post

if I went back in time and replaced kodachrome with an 100% different emulsion and called it "boogerchrome" then in 2017 everyone would be saying "oh maaan they need to remake boogerchrome it was the most beautiful film ever ;;__;;"

i'll admit maybe 0.1% of the photographic population actually enjoy it for the tonality rather than the nostalgia factor

>>3043051

suck my dick bitch i'm posting through eight layers of irony you think you can understand me?

>>3043050
>they are making a ""e100"" generic ektachrome for dummies who dont know better.

Maybe they're developing an emulsion that scans better?

>>3043140
>slides
>scanning

>>3043148
>current year
>projecting them onto a wall

>>3043148
>Boring people to death by forcing them to watch your slideshow

>>3043155
>>3043345
>not projecting gorgeous slides of a cool trip while having a bbq & beer with friends
gay.

>>3043140
>Maybe they're developing an emulsion that scans better?
like new portra that looks like fucking lame shit?

>>3042453

>that guy in the middle pitching a tent

Can't really blame him.

>>3043417
yeah kodachrome does that to you.

How can you achieve this look digitally?

>>3043346
Reddit leave

>>3043464
>not projecting slides in your cuckshed after getting some chicken tendies while hugging your anime fuckpillow or whatever
is that enough 4chan for you?