Thread replies: 8
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: Central_Pier_9.jpg (978KB, 2048x1536px) Image search:
[Google]
978KB, 2048x1536px
Why does digital seem to have such a problem with rendering highlights? Especially in night scenes?
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software ACD Systems Digital Imaging Image-Specific Properties: Image Orientation Top, Left-Hand Image Width 2048 Image Height 1536
>>
>>3041681
Because of the very limited dynamic range. Many such cases, Sad!
>>
>>3041681
there is no camera a fag like you could afford which could do night + neon light at the same time, so go play in traffic.
>>
>>3041690
Doesn't digital actually have a better dynamic range than film?
>>
>>3041693
OP pic seems to differ.
>>
>>3041693
Probably not, but with digital to get the most dynamic range you under expose/expose for the highlights and bring up the shadows in post, but this causes a lot of noise. But with film you expose for the shadows as you can over expose the highlights a lot. And then you could do some developing to bring down the highlights.
So even if they had the same dynamic range, their range is in a different location so thats why one might have more dynamic range than the other
>>
>>3041741
Nicely explained for someone that doesn't know what he's talking about typing to someone else with no clue either.
>>
>>3041741
>their range is in a different location
lol what?
You're completely wrong anyways.
Thread posts: 8
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1