What's the best professional camera system? Canon F1n Nikon

Dust, plus no point. Modular viewfinders weren't popular even in film's day.

The most "pro" today is probably Canon, in terms of system range, build quality in the top tier, and reliability and quality of their professional services. Nikon would be a close second.

>>3038921
sorry, I meant to write "what is the best professional Film System camera?"

>>3038922

Answer is still Canon unless you're talking manual focus, which is then Nikon for 35mm, hasselblad for medium format.

>>3038922

The most pro film camera is gonna have to be either the Contax 645 or Mamiya RZ67. If you want to shoot 35mm go for a Nikon F5.

>>3038923
>Habblesad

Nope. Not even close, get a Mamiya or a Bronica or even a Fuji.

The evidence shows that Hasselblads are cameras that suffer from never being actually used, but instead sold after 6 months.

>>3038919
But to answer your question, a solid nikon would suffice.

One that is all mechanical, and was manufactured for over 30 years, so reliable that government agencies still use it in harsh weathers of -40 to +40.

That camera is of course the Nikon FM2

>>3038982
>The evidence

which evidence?

>What's the best professional camera system?

not film

>>3039035
Every single listing I see for a hassy online. Just like Leica.

File: T2W09Ow.jpg (140KB, 425x640px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 425x640px

the majestic F3

>>3039198
if I have to look at another shallow depth of field shot of someone's cat, I'm going to fucking kill myself.

>>3038919
The only answer is the Sony A7Rii. Nothing else even comes close in terms of value or modern lenses.

>professional
>anything smaller than 4x5

Pick one.

>>3039393

Yeah, you're the authority on that one...

>>3039393
I literally thought you had died of diabetes.

Have you even taken a photo in the last 6 months?

>>3039402

>you fell for 2/10 obvious-tier bait

In all seriousness 645 is where I would draw the line. I wouldn't drag an 8x10 to a press conference, but I damn sure wouldn't be caught on anything smaller than 6x7 in a landscape scene.

>>3039407

>falling for the 1/10 obvious replacement bait that replaced your stolen 2/10 obvious bait

File: EC9E4ADF-A8B7-41C3-8F64-E4157A655842.jpg (697KB, 2544x1696px) Image search: [Google]

697KB, 2544x1696px

>>3039383
Do it

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	OLYMPUS IMAGING CORP.
Camera Model	E-M5
Camera Software	Version 2.0
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:21 03:44:04
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	1600
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Light Source	Tungsten
Flash	No Flash, Auto
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2544
Image Height	1696
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	High Gain Up
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	High
Sharpness	Hard

>>3039425

fuck :(

>>3039198
This is adorable, I wish my cat had a scarf and also that I had a cat.