>https://petapixel.com/2017/02/24/f ujifilm-uk-sparks-out

>2k17
>People get offended by boobs

>UK
There's your answer

>it's a twitter outrage episode

Wew lads. By even linking to this you're just contributing to the decline of journalism.

>twitter screencap

go back to your containment board, /tv/.

>cuck fuji uk says shooting nude female models is not in line with their values

>>3028797
>multi volume tweets.

Just get a fucking blog aaaarghhh.

...so are there any pics from the event floating around?

>>3028850
Yeah, jpeg or stfu. I must also, uh, inspect the material to see just how, uhh, offensive it is.

What exactly is he getting upset over? Is it because there was nudity or was it because the nudity was unexpected?

They blamed the photographer running the workshop

https://petapixel.com/2017/02/24/fujifilm-uk-sparks-outrage-trotting-topless-model-gfx-demo-event/

>>3028850
Kai tried to get a sneak peek.
But he was told to fuck off before he could get any good shots.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgWoz-e8oZk

File: snip2.png (119KB, 297x401px) Image search: [Google]

119KB, 297x401px

Dude is just trying to get his name out there by tweeting over some non issue.

From a business standpoint it was a horrible idea precisely because of Twitter tantrums.

File: 1487956622036.png (815KB, 1076x652px) Image search: [Google]

815KB, 1076x652px

We just live in a world where feminists are crazy in the head and extremely schizophrenic.

Some of them go out of their way to provoke and come out nude in a crowd of unsuspecting people.
Some of them get their pants in a twist and are offended by sexualising nude exposure of women.

It's a bipolar schizophrenic movement that doesn't know what it wants.
It can't even agree with itself.
And majority of real women feel disgusted by them and don't want to associate with these crazy lunatic men who are offended on behalf of others.

>>3030328

easy there, cargo shorts.

File: 1486388779345.jpg (29KB, 530x458px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 530x458px

>Dude on Twitter gets upset over tiddies
>This is news worthy
Fucking hell Petapixel.

>>3030328
Read the comments anon. It's sad. She's out there working as a topless model and they're trying to ruin her job. Even if she is getting paid 78 cents on the dollar that Danny makes

>>3030446
>78 cents on the dollar
Actually it's male models that are "discriminated" and underpaid.

But in the same breath even that is just bullshit rhetoric. Payments are simply different because the free market makes it so.

>>3030449
>free market
no such thing.

>>3030481
There is no "oppressive Matriarchy" that are suppressing the salary of male models. It's simply because people don't need their service as much.

Don't use the same kind of argument is what feminists use.

>>3028797
>complaining because of tits
Is he gay or something?

>>3030511
He is just being offended on behalf of people he is unrelated to.

It's a broad epidemic in western countries. Some crazy lunatic who is offended on behalf of Hawaii: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B3Wv1nX-Pog

> 2017
> people are not happy with everything
What the fuck is wrong with the west now?

>>3028797
>show their breasts
100 tokens for doggy?

Medium format has always been for fashion/porn/lady photos. "Landscape" photography is just location scouting for a hot chick (or guy, but not so much).

Why would anyone buy a GFX 50s to take pictures of their cat and/or a sandwich.

The best fap material is your gfs' fashion mags.

>>3030498
Nobody was saying anything about the matriarchy or whatever bullshit you're talking about, your argument is just objectively false because there's no such thing as the free market. Calm down, /pol/tard.

>>3030758
There is in this context. Hiring and paying for models isn't regulated by the governments.

>>3030511
He thinks feminists will want to fuck him if he "helps" their """"cause"""""

I think it's brilliant. It'll get photographers looking very closely at the files. Then at some point they'll realize, "You know, if I had shot this on my 50 megabucks Cannon Fodder 5DSR, these files wouldn't have been so clear and pristine."

>>3028797
>what if you was

>>3028797
Jesus christ this was pushing the envelop in the 60's where women could do what they chose. this would have been artfully innovative now we have come full circle and its anti feminist? the fuck is going on here?

>feminazi shows tits in public
you go girl

>model shows tits in a small event
despicable patriarchy

>>3031042

i bet if that girl could choose, she would choose not to show her tits to sell a camera.

the fact that you don't grasp this subtlety doesn't surprise me.

>>3028797

Nude models are fine.

In this context they aren't.

Overstep by the photog running the show followed by a over-reaction by a nobody virtue signaling.

Nothing to see here.

>>3031052

Not him, but you not being able to grasp that women and men both get into modeling, along with nude modeling, because they like it is not surprising either. Most SJWs can't recognize that the world isn't black and white.

>>3031063

>"I got naked in front of a bunch of leering photographers because I get really excited about selling a new camera!"

- Literally no model ever.

>>3031066
>>3031052
There you go, Libshits being offended on behalf of others.

You don't even know what the model think. Maybe they like it as a high paying job.
Maybe they see this as a dream job compared to showing cow shit in a farm.
Maybe they see this joob as easy and convenient.

But noooo, Libshits would rather have them lose the job. You want to be the model's parent.
You think the model can't think for himself or herself.
You have to decide life for them.
You think you know what's best for them.

>>3031083

Quick, call me a cuck while your energy is still high.

>>3031086
That's not far fetched at all. When you want to remove a model's livelihood and decide life for them, just so you can pat yourself in the back and convince yourself you did the right thing.

>>3031087

but that's not what a cuckold does. a cuckold would be happy to have his object of desire get naked in front of a bunch of strangers.

sheesh, get your terminology straight.

also, i'm a pro-sex feminist and strongly believe in a woman's right to use her naked body and sexual appeal to make as much money as possible, so you've got that wrong too. ;)

>>3031089
Pro-sex feminists are outdated and deplatformed. You're out of the movement, you've been excluded. You have no say and can't speak on their behalf.

>>3031093
>You have no say and can't speak on their behalf.

i don't profess to.

>>3031095
You're obviously still cucked yourself into serving their label. Serving their movement. Namely by wanting the model to lose her job and think you know what's best for her.

>>3031083

Please stop using Liberal as an insult. I (>>3031063) vote lib and agree with you.

These guys are just pure SJW garbage.

>>3031066

>-1 reading comprehension
>typical SJW

Read my actual post. I agree this is not cool in this context.

But go figure SJW Tumblr trash will read things however they want to pick fights.

>>3031097
>Namely by wanting the model to lose her job and think you know what's best for her.

haha, WHAT?!

>>3031100
See>>3031052 and >>3031066

If you're going to take back what you said, it involves admitting you were wrong and retarded. I don't believe you have done this yet.

>>3031104

nowhere in there do I say that the model ought to lose her job or I think I know what's best for her.

if you can find a model who will say "hey, i love getting naked for a minor new camera model release with about 15 guys", let me know.

>>3031109
>nowhere in there do I say that the model ought to lose her job or I think I know what's best for her.
But that's what you did. You are a fucking snob who thinks that modelling job is something no one should do.

You promoted yourself to act in their interest, for their good, because you think you know what they think on the matter.

>>3031109

The fact you're demonizing the female body so much is appalling and I'm with >>3031113 here.

If it was a perfectly sculpted male model in nothing but boxers nobody would've said a thing. But here we are in 2017 with people still believing that women need to cover up their shameful bodies while crying that they're defending them.

>>3031113
>You are a fucking snob who thinks that modelling job is something no one should do.

lmao.

>>3031115
>If it was a perfectly sculpted male model in nothing but boxers nobody would've said a thing.

Let me know the next time they have a half naked male model come out to sell a camera. We all know it's very common at photography conventions to have half-naked men walking around.

>>3031121

>Can't read

kek

>>3031128

snek

i don't get it. I thought they wanted to free the titty to desexualize it?

If she's topless and it's tastefully done for art (like using live models for nude figures) then this furthers their agenda.

>>3031962
you can't argue with hypocrisy