>considering using film again after a long time, for some

>>3026084
probably because they're much older and therefore more boring
there are still lots of photographers shooting interesting photos on film

because we needed another digital vs. film dick measuring thread on the board.

>>3026084
Worry about your own art

Your mistakes:

>flickr
>adox cms 20 page
>not just shooting portra 160 and xp2

File: NewerScansForPFD.jpg (4MB, 5888x3936px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 5888x3936px

>>3026090
>because we needed another digital vs. film dick measuring thread on the board.
This.
Check out my film resolution.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2016:08:29 11:34:27
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-4.5 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Daylight
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	5888
Image Height	3936
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>3026084
I think you'll find that any photographer than identifies through their specific medium rather than their work will most always produce mundane shit.

Pick something you like and keep working with it

File: 1453160187820.jpg (313KB, 4685x2457px) Image search: [Google]

313KB, 4685x2457px

>Here is one example, this is supposed to be a film for very "serious" photographers btw
Who says? You?
I've never heard anyone claim that CMS 20 is for serious photographers. It's an emulsion for a very specific purpose and how a user intends to use it is completely up to them. Even the Adox site does nothing to claim this. Here, have a look at these banterful lads:
http://www.adox.de/Photo/adox-films-2/cms-20-ii-adotech-ii/

You wanna shit on those other CMS 20 users? Sure go for it. Go out, shoot 1 roll of it and submit all 36 exposures and shit on their users at the same time, create a new account do so if you wish to remain anonymous and report back here with your submissions and a link to your posts where you call them out.
Otherwise all you're really doing is being a whiny little cunt on the internet not really contributing anything to the board. May as well have started another brand wars thread.

I'll be here waiting for your results. pic related, this is what my reaction will be when you deliver.

File: DSC05176.jpg (288KB, 1152x800px) Image search: [Google]

288KB, 1152x800px

>>3026084
>Also, why do non hipsters waste their money and time on analogue snapshits?
bruh

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	ILCE-7
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.0
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	0 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	350 dpi
Vertical Resolution	350 dpi
Image Created	2017:02:21 23:20:04
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/0.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Brightness	-5.9 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Daylight
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	0.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1152
Image Height	800
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>3026084
low quality bait

every other photo on that board is better than OPs

>>3026113
>When I open a flickr pool of a random ancient or entry level DSLR I see much more decent shots

I have the exact opposite experience.

>open Flickr group of a film camera
>good photos everywhere with nice colors, lighting and composition

>open Flickr group for latest expensive digital camera or lens
>bland over or underprocessed photography with terrible colors and composition

>>3026175
i need jew tits in my life.