CC [EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.] Camera-Specific

File: 0G3A9813.jpg (994KB, 5760x3840px) Image search: [Google]

994KB, 5760x3840px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark III
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:02:12 22:21:00
Exposure Time	1/100 sec
F-Number	f/1.2
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/1.2
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	85.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: 0G3A9506.jpg (695KB, 3840x5760px) Image search: [Google]

695KB, 3840x5760px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark III
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:02:12 22:27:21
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/1.2
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/1.2
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	85.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: 0G3A9484-Edit.jpg (934KB, 5760x3840px) Image search: [Google]

934KB, 5760x3840px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark III
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:02:12 22:27:58
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/1.2
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/1.2
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	85.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: 0G3A9217.jpg (849KB, 3840x5760px) Image search: [Google]

849KB, 3840x5760px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark III
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:02:12 22:28:20
Exposure Time	1/160 sec
F-Number	f/1.2
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	3200
Lens Aperture	f/1.2
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	85.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

itd be nice if i could see more than 1/4th of the image on my screen at one time

>>3020853
>>3020855
Too dark. No pun intended.

Use spot metering/center weighted on the face.

You're too fast at 1/100, If you have IS you can shoot at even 1/15 with steady hands

>>3021041
The speed doesn't matter with still subjects as long as no camera shake is made.

To OP, I hate you because you have expensive gear

use flash or expose for the subject

>>3021041
I'm trying to stick to the keep your shutter faster than your focal length rule to eliminate camera shake and unfortunately this lens has no IS. The ones that came out dark I didn't want to jump to a faster ISO so I felt like my hands were tied at that point

>>3021065
Flash gives photos this unnatural look I'm not particularly fond of so I stray from using it. Maybe I just need a soft box to diffuse it

>>3021062
>I hate you because you have expensive gear

I'm single and still live with the folks and barely go out photography is the only thing where my money goes

>>3021134
Now these feels hit me hard sorry I feel you ;( but still don't have the money

>>3021062
You stupid fuck, OP is already at f1.2 and iso800 he needs to slow down to get brighter images.

>>3021081
Try 1/50

>>3021163
The triangle of exposition is equivalent, a faster shutter or a slower iso are the same when talking about exposition

>>3021165
Obviously you fucking cunt.

He needs to slow down because at 800 iso his already having noise issues.

File: 271.gif (1MB, 288x198px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 288x198px

>>3020853
It's a crime to own a 85mm f1.2 and doing this.

>>3021082
Flash does not look unnatural if done right, It just looks like a sunny day.

>>3021082
>Flash gives photos this unnatural look
B-but flash is like almost 6500k. You can't be more natural than daylight exposure. You're not doing it right.

>>3021365
What I meant to say is that with a single speed light and no modifier I don't like the harsh shadows it creates

>>3021378
Learn2flahs

>>3021318
What do you mean

>>3020858
Best of the bunch.

>>3021016
fix the image settings on the website

>>3021471
Still a lot underexposed

>>3021586
i think it doesnt look as good for you is because its downsized but yeah i mean its dark theres not much that can be done in terms of making it brighter without introducing camera shake

>>3021594
actually i take that back i couldve lowered the flash power and made my shutter slower to 1/100

>>3021597
>1.2 lens
>still underexposed
You had only one job...

>>3021594
Just raise the blacks a little, you'll get detail without fucking up the aesthetic.

>>3021597
>heres not much that can be done in terms of making it brighter without introducing camera shake
>i couldve lowered the flash power

>it doesnt look as good for you is because its downsized
>5760x3840

Op confirmed for trolling. No one can buy 5 grands of gear and be THIS retarded.
Abandon thread.

>>3021999
>No one can buy 5 grands of gear and be THIS retarded
Don't underestimate the power of a retarded.

>>3020858
I like this one, it has cool vibe. Rest is stiff as fuck.

>>3021999
Are you retarded? A single flash doesn't make the whole image magically brighter and at 1/100 I can only go down 1/3 of a stop in shutter until there's camera shake.

This shit retains the same dimensions of the original picture except there's only 1MB of information to fill up those dimensions but clearly you're too dense to get that

>>3020853
how are you metering?

>>3022165
Exposing to the right not blowing out highlights

>>3022162
The real question is why are you giving us 5760x3840 pixels worth of mushy jpeg artifacts, instead of 1200x800 crisp and clear uncompressed pixels?

>>3022182
It's easier to limit file size on export for me

>>3022170
There are speculare everywhere. Actual lights, railings. They are underexposed

>>3022188
That's a shitty reason.

File: Layer2.jpg (963KB, 1031x1815px) Image search: [Google]

963KB, 1031x1815px

>>3022217
fixed

>>3022195
the only thing thats underexposed is his clothes everything else is fine except for small areas in the face

>>3022242
i guess.. i dont really care about some nigger photo anyway

>>3022237

At least I can see his face now.

It's a shame you have such a good glass and do this kind of thing.

File: 1486956579213-2.jpg (613KB, 900x600px) Image search: [Google]

613KB, 900x600px

Some proper editing can help these photos out.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark III
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5.0 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:02:14 18:42:19
Exposure Time	1/100 sec
F-Number	f/1.2
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/1.2
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	85.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3022271
it looks like all you did was boost the clarity and add some greens in the shadows maybe even dodge his face

>>3022271
Why the 5D is so noisy at 800?

File: 0G3A9813.jpg (347KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

347KB, 1000x667px

>>3022279
hes editing a jpeg
i did similar adjustments to what he did except i dont go for the overcooked look

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark III
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:02:14 22:06:20
Exposure Time	1/100 sec
F-Number	f/1.2
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/1.2
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	85.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: 0G3A9813.jpg (368KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

368KB, 1000x667px

>>3022283
some export out sharpening for screen

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 5D Mark III
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.5 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.2
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2017:02:14 22:08:53
Exposure Time	1/100 sec
F-Number	f/1.2
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/1.2
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	85.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3021306
>>3021163
Why are you so angry?

File: Screen Shot 2017-02-14 at 10.12.38 PM.png (3MB, 1766x1062px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1766x1062px

1:1 crop of how the detail looks on my screen for those that are wondering about the noise levels at iso800

>>3022259
what kind of thing dude take portraits of people?

>>3022288
Still noisy. My uncle's D810 is miles better at even 3200

>>3022293
yeah but nikon doesnt have a 1.2 85mm, you win some and lose some. can you show us an example of the noise levels of your uncle's d810 shot at iso3200 in similar lighting conditions?