Let's go: > Recent purchases > Wishlists > Recent

XT2 is about the only mirrorless camera that can focus on the same day you want to take the fucking picture

>>3015236
A6500

>>3015314

xpro 2

>>3015317
Yeah with the firmware update, holy shit it's fast.

>>3015236
>>3015317
>tfw x-e2

>Fuji Thread
Alright boiz, time to prove whether you're the shit or just shit.

Anyone use the Fujinon T 300m f/8? It's more readily available than the Nikon, but I'm still not 100% sold on it.

>>3015343
What's keeping you away from it senpai?

I'll probably end up selling my Fuji gear later this year and swap over to Sony.

That said, I used my Fuji gear professionally but I've decided to make a career change and the fact is that I no longer need ultimate IQ and the best color science but rather resolution and low light capabilities for my new job (not as a photographer).

>>3015530
Thanks for sharing that.

>>3015533

Np buddeh

>>3015008
Recently picked up Batis 85. Now I need the 18mm... help.

Played around with the x-t2 today, damn it's nice. It even makes focusing the 23/1.4 tolerable. Want is stronk. My current x-t1 is okay, but can't decide if I should get a used xpro2, xt2 or xt20... My 18-135 is gone tho, ain't nobody got time for slow ass glass. Fuji should make something like a 100-300 f/4.

I cheated a bit and tried some other stuff at the store. Em1 mkii is a got damn beast for what it is. Em5 mkii is quite nice tho too. As was canon m5, of all things. Should I swap all my shit again...

>>3015539
I've got an XT-10 with 23 f1.4, it's got good focusing, never had an issue once. I'd wait for the XT-20.

>>3015544
Yeah I have no real problems with xt1+23/1.4 either. But xt2 just makes it so much faster somehow. Let's see about the xt20 when it becomes available.

Recent purchases:
X+T2, 23mm 1.4, 14mm , 60mm
Number of shots taken in the last 2 weeks: 11...

I really need for it to be either proper winter with snow here (netherlands) or spring to hurry the fuck up.

I also regret not getting the 18-55 kit because it goes together with the 14mm so well for minimalism travels. Same hood + filters with a tiny bag. Maybe I'll eventually pick up a used one but right now they're still more expensive than 300 euros for the kitlens would have been.

>>3015601
Nice! I just use the 23mm f1.4, and it seems to do more than enough for travel. You live in the Netherlands, there is plenty of shit to take pictures of.

>>3015586
So, even faster then?


Right now I'm pretty content with my setup. I was thinking of getting the famous 35mm f2, but whats holding me back is that it's quite close to the 23mm. It's light and small, and the XT-10 seems to be made for it.

Then there is the 50mm f2 that is coming out but its £450 at LCE - so lets say £400 on Ebay or the sort, 75mm equivalent... Good telephoto, and it might be an interesting focal length to play with.

I have a FD to FX converter and my 50mm 1.8 canon lens can do the job, but it's obviously not autofocus.

14 2.8
23 1.4
35 1.4
56 1.2

Original Fujifag reporting in.

Bought a lensmate thumbgrip for the xpro2 this week.

>>3015606
>So, even faster then?

Yeah, less hunting and just confident snap to focus.

I have the og 35/1.4 that I'll probably swap out for the new 50/2. It'll cost around 500€ here, which is quite a lot for what it is. Kind of pisses me off. I like the 75mm eqv field of view though and I suppose it will focus faster than I can with my manual niftyfifties...

One thing that I really want is a lensturbo ii for nikon g lenses.

Torn between getting a xpro2 or a leica m8

bought a canon a1

>>3015632
No digital Leica is worth it. There are always better alternatives.

This week I bought the Rode Filmmaker Wireless Rx/Tx lavalier mic, secondary lavalier and the Rode VideomicGo Pro.

Altogether spent £700 on mics, very good pieces of kit. Highly recommended.

>>3015634
i had a small time with film and the only thing i guess i dislike about it is needing to go to a camera store to develop it, $1,500 for a m8 is pretty good no?

>>3015632
Friend, trust everyone when they say digital leicas are shit.

>>3015638
so leica m6 ttl?

File: newer.jpg (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

I just got neewer speedlight holders. It ssems to secure the speedlights better than a cold shoe type.

File: pocketwiz.jpg (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

>>3015642
And I also picked up some pocket wizzards.

Very nice.

>>3015632
>>3015638
m10 changes everything

File: DSCF4271a.jpg (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

Tried the ND1000 on my fooji today

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>3015636
M8 has disgusting iq, not worth a damn thing as an actual tool in 2^11-31.

>>3015650
>>3015650
>£5,600

No chance.

With that money you can add another grand and you'll have a brand new digital MEDIUM format camera.

Or,

You can have the toppest of top range Fuji cameras with basically every relevant lens. And have money left over to go on holiday with.

Leica is a sick joke perpetuated by this illusion of it being any different from other top of the range cameras.

Film yes, ok. Digital: NO.

>>3015008
I like manual controls, this looks and feels like my daddy's old Cosina from the 70's I used learning photography.

Srs question.

I really want to buy an XT2 for travel, why does everyone say the lenses suck? Is this true? I'm looking at the kit lens and a 35 F2.

Looking for some non-troll answers. It's a lot of money to me.

>>3015714
>why does everyone say
no one says that except two butthurt sonyfags on /p/

>>3015714
If you're talking about negative opinions on this board they centre around a reliance on a subset of mtf charts from select reviewers that focus on ultimate sharpness. They don't consider colour rendition, contrast, flare handling, CA, autofocus speed or, often enough, relative cost (or weight or size).

The best advice I can give you is to look at a lot of samples, don't forget the Zeiss 32, and think about the 23f2 if you're going for a one lens kit.

>>3015714
No they don't fucking suck - they are going to give you great results. If you do your homework it will be revealed that Fuji really have thought about their lens catalogue and really put in a lot of effort into designing exactly what you need.

There is currently a launch of F/2 "fujicron" lenses modelled after the legendary Leica Summicron line - which are F/2. The 35 f2 is apparently so good that it out-prices the 1.4 on a regular basis.

And just because some dickhead took pictures of his wheelie bins and concluded that Fuji was the "weakest" - understand that these are the sort of people that never actually take pictures of anything of interest. It's just gear-faggotry bro-science.

>>3015632
Leicas are shit. Digital Leicas are especially shit. The M8 is especially shit among digital Leicas.

I'm not saying you should buy an xpro2. I did. But do not buy a m8.

File: DSCF5240.jpg (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

Daily reminder that it is totally possible to take acceptable wheelie bin shots with a Fuji.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	FUJIFILM
Camera Model	FinePix X100
Camera Software	Capture One 9 Macintosh
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Exposure Time	1/60 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Brightness	3.1 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	19.00 mm
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1327
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>3015733
I don't know man, you don't want some salt sonygger to come and start screeching in this thread.

File: Untitaaled.png (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

>>3015008
>/gear/ exists, but fuji still needs safespaces
wew

>>3015714
Fuji lenses aren't the most extraordinary in terms of sharpness, but their form factor, ergos and style suit their x-line. Look into an a7-type and the 35/2.8 for travel or even 20mm pancake + a6x00. That setup is unbeatable.

>>3015766
fugg, spoke to soon.

>>3015632
>m8
would you consider getting an X-E1, the m8 will be worse

>>3015236
Canon G7X mkii? Quickest af I've ever seen

>>3015733
I'm more interested in those sweet tiered door jambs.

>>3015730
>>3015689
okay, so Leica M6 it is then i guess, what digital camera should i get then? x100f? Xpro2?
I have no budget, my only concern is not looking like tourist with a big dslr on the streets

>>3016000
theyre technically the same, so its up to you if you want a fixed or non-fixed lens.

>>3016000
The x100f is more compact seeing as it's 23mm lens is smaller than most lenses on the xpro2. I guess you could pair it with the 27mm, but it's a bit underwhelming.

Tough choice breh - basically the same camera minus the lens design.

File: 4L_OiCwtfQ3.jpg (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

Just bought a silver X-T1 with a 23 mm f2. Thinking about getting the 35 mm f1.4 or maybe even the 50 mm f2

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Apple
Camera Model	iPhone 5
Camera Software	10.2
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	33 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:02:05 12:54:54
Exposure Time	1/52 sec
F-Number	f/2.4
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	50
Lens Aperture	f/2.4
Brightness	4.3 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Flash	Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	4.12 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3264
Image Height	2448
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3015332
>TFW X-E1 with manual lens

Anyone tried a GFX yet?
What was it like?

>>3015767
a5100 + 20mm.
eos m6 + 22mm.

Just took delivery of my 10-24 f/4 this morning. Might consider moving my 14mm f/2.8 on now.

sold my 5D3, 1D2, 600 EX-RT 35 F1.4 and 50 F1.4 pand ordered an X-Pro 2, 23mm F2, 35mm F2 and 50mm F2, plus spare battery and two memory cards and two yonguo flashes and triggers

total trade cost me about 9 bucks out of pocket after selling my gear.

so bored with canon

>>3016777
Camera shop I work at is bringing one in on the 16th for a show and tell and in store demo. I'll be bringing a memory card or two and I can share some images on /p/

Sold my X100S (with the wide converter) and my Lumix LX100 and got a Fuji X-T1(14mm f2.8 and 35mm f2) and a RX100 MK II.

Loving my new setup so far. The autofocus on the X-T1 and the viewfinder are so much better than the X100S's.

File: IMG_5531.jpg (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

Can anyone tell me what I've got my hands on here? I'm a total beginner and all I have is this Olympus camera which I received as a gift a few years ago. Is it decent enough for someone who has no idea what they're doing?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Apple
Camera Model	iPhone 6s
Camera Software	10.0.2
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	29 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:02:07 13:04:33
Exposure Time	1/17 sec
F-Number	f/2.2
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	800
Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Brightness	-2.2 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Auto
Focal Length	4.15 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4032
Image Height	3024
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: dscf5188-copy~2-2400x894.jpg (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

>>3015728
>test charts that show fuji lenses to be poor performers are meaningless
>real life test shots that show fuji lenses to be poor performers are meaningless

Basically, if it's a test where you are able to do an apples for apples comparison with any other manufacturer, it's meaningless.

(but look at the gross, crunchy, oof areas, kek.)

>>3017365
Canon best colour rendition, Sone least spherochromatism, Zeiss best rendering of OOF areas, Fuji seems to be focused behind all the others.

>>3015777
>Canon G7X mkii
>mirrorless camera

>>3017387
The Zeiss has the worst CA

>>3017361
Yes it's good anon, make sure to make the best out of it. Though if you want to get seriously into photography you might want to look into sony's e-mount or canikon.

>>3015008
>> Wishlists
>> Gearfaggotry
Sony RX100 V for let's say 200 bucks
>> Salty Sonyfags
is the reason why it's just a Sony RX100 I

any news on the release date for the xt20?

>>3015714
As others have answered; they don't.
In fact, Fuji X is the ONLY system that has all the lenses that I prefer: a bunch of high quality medium sized primes that fit well together with the body and have similar rendering and handling. They have some downsides like lack of full time MF override or OIS on the primes, but all in all no other system gives me the combos that I have now (xt2, 14mm, 23mm, 35mm, 60mm, 55-250 and an xe1 backup).

File: 100mmSTF-FE.jpg (207KB, 700x556px) Image search: [Google]

207KB, 700x556px

So salty

>>3017280
Purease do.
Start a thread if there's no fooj one by then.

Are Fuji cameras the only ones that produce pleasant digital images?

>>3017584
That's a strange question, I don't think there is a company that isn't concentrating in that area.

But yeah, they're pretty nice :)

>>3017400
What do they offer that mine doesn't?

>recent purchase
Tamron 24-70 VC. Has been fairly impressed so far.
>lusting for
Tamron 70-200 VC G2

>>3018064
The best thing with the VC G2 is that the G1 will drop in price. Loads of cheap used ones will flood the market.
I have the early non-VC one, fairly impressed by it, don't really need more for hobby purposes.

>>3018083
Yeah thats great but for the same price I'd rather buy the G2. Unless it turn out to be worse than the current G1

>>3018084
They say it is an improved optical formula, maybe focus breathing is better corrected. For me, the focus breathing is a non-issue.

Im on a hunt for Fujis 56mm or 90mm. You guys know if camera gear is cheaper over in japan as to compared to lets say europe prices? Im going to jap in a month so was wondering if its worth waiting until i get there.

>>3018223

Fuji is actually more expensive in Japan than the U.S.

>>3015008
>bentax a 70-210mm f4
>all the way from nippon
>$23
i know i won't use it, but for $23, why not.
just in case i need the focal length.

>>3015777
I mean I guess compact cameras are technically mirrorless

Going to nyc in a few weeks and I'm tempted to trade in my 4 year old 600d and buy an XT2.

Should I? :3

>>3018467
I guess it depends on how many lenses you have and how much you'll lose on the exchange, and what you want from the camera.

>>3017277
do you miss the 5d3's af at all?

How important is optical correction vs digitally correction on lenses?

File: raw-vs-jpeg.jpg (79KB, 680x453px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 680x453px

How do you guys process your raw ?
My jpegs tends to look better than my raw and I end up using them.

I know that RAW is unprocessed and I need to work my raw files in order to have something good. However, I just can understand the logic. Should I raise my shadows ? My contrast ? My exposure ? Most of the time I just fuck with the button and ragequit LR.

I know that my matter is not specifically about fuji gear but how come my pictures can look so good on the LCD screen and I can get the same results with my raw and LR ?

Is the Fuji GS645S worth getting?

>>3018541
just download some lightroom presets until you figure out wtf you're doing :)

>>3018513
No, I mean its a tad slower, but I can deal. being able to fit my entire kit into a backpack or my Tamrac shoulder bag is too good to pass up.

I make day or two day trips maybe twice a month for work so I got a Think Tank Perception, holds body, lenses, toiletries, chargers for phone or whatever plus my tablet and room for a change of clothes. It's great.

And the change of system is nice, I went from Rebel T3i to 1D2 then to 5D3 and now this. My X100T got as much use in the past year as my 5D did.

>>3018542
Yes.
>>3015494
Mainly the bellows draw required for a 300mm lens. I've heard that telephoto designs require less bellows draw and that I can use a recessed lens board but I'm still on the fence as to whether it's worth it compared to a 240 that's a stop faster (but much heavier).

It's a long shot on whether someone has used one or not but it's worth asking.

>Recent purchases
Got a D7100 for $600, 16-85 VR for $350. I should be set for quite a while now...
>Wishlists
Except I want a 300/4 for muh sports, 60 or 105 micro for film scanning/medium telephoto, and 24/2.8 for 35mm equivalent. And a TTL flash for just in case. The ride never ends.
>Recent photos
Nothing good, nothing to see in the winter here. Just wet and grey.

File: sonymemes.png (522KB, 1800x940px) Image search: [Google]

522KB, 1800x940px

>>3017365
enjoy your focus shifts, massive vignetting and ugly ass bokeh, our beloved sony trashman.

>>3018541
shoot both jpeg + raw and try to recreate the simulation effects side by side as close as possible with your raw editor. You'll figure out that way whats what and where to improve.

>>3018796
Imagine a triangle, you have high resolution, low vignette, small size. Lens design is a case of pick 2.

Sony have decided to go big for some of their lenses and for others vignette took the hit, why, because vignettes can be fixed in post with minimal consequences when you're on a full frame sensor.

Fuji decided to drop the ball on sharpness more than anything, and that makes sense for them, they can't afford to lose 2 stops on a noisy crop sensor and they aren't looking for the best image quality so going for something big makes no sense.

And, why would i care for focus shift, the af on all my lenses works flawlessly.

And plz, look at that eye aids foreground bokeh on the fuji, it's pig disgusting.

>>3018541
>trying to use fuji rafs in lightroom
Kekkest of keks.

>>3018803
>>3018803
>trying to use fuji rafs in lightroom
and? x-transformer + lightroom solved the issues. But yeah lets ignore that fact and let this lightroom meme go for a little while longer.
>Fuji decided to drop the ball on sharpness more than anything
Still, 35mm center is sharp as fuck wide open. Sure its soft on corners, but look at your FE 1.8 corners. Its even worse than the yongnuo for 50 bucks.
>why would i care for focus shift, the af on all my lenses works flawlessly.
you'd care if youre readjusting aperture when already focused to a subject.
>can be fixed in post with minimal consequences
and adds two stops of noise on corners.

>>3018812
>x-transformer
>my photography depends on one dude in his basement

>35mm is sharp in the centre
Compared to a lens half its price and covering 4 times the image circle, what happens when you put it against the sony 55mm? Oh and the 50mm on ff still has much higher mtf values in the centre AND in the corners.

>focus shift
You've never used a sony before have you? Depending on the lens/situation it focuses stopped down, which is amazing for getting hyperfocal nailed easily.

>adds 2 stops of noise
And what, sony gives clean images at 3200 and it's incredibly rare i drop below iso 800, especially with ibis pulling back 2 stops.

If i wanted the best of the best iq, I'd get the 50mm f1.4 gm.

>>3018817
>>Oh and the 50mm on ff still has much higher mtf values in the centre AND in the corners
>16mp vs 36mp mtf charts
you are truly retarded. Go back to sony thread and keep shitposting over there.

File: IMG_0920.png (4MB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2048x1536px

>>3018817
>clean images at ISO 3200

AHAHAHAHAHAAAHAAAAHAAAAA

>>3018820
>buhbuhbuh mtf is meaningless

Lol, whys it always fuji fags crying over this.

>>3018826
Nikon & fuji apply noise reduction to raws in camera, you're literally showing me a picture that implies fuji and nikon know they're customers don't have a clue what they're doing.
10/10

>>3018830
Admit it, you're on suicide watch ;)

>putting your $2k humongous xboxhuge sony lenses on a plastic flimsy e-mount
>ishygddt
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLjpb1a0Xfo&

>>3018826
>that green vomit noise

>>3018826

>everything has more detail than the x-t2 even with more noise

top kek

>>3018830
ok sonycuck, next time ill bring in the fuji gfx mtf chart :^)

>>3018832
Says the person with no rebuttal except an emoji

>>3018833
>not understanding material sciences
The plastic bit is a shim, it prevents warping of the metal bits if they heat up/cool down unevenly.

>>3018834
Chroma noise
It's removable in lightroom, and that removal has already occurred on the nikon/fuji raws because nikon/fuji don't trust you with an actual raw file.

>>3018836
Ok, I'll bring in the habblesad one.

>>3018837
Just admit Sony fucked up with the sensor tuning on the a7ii

The real point is the fucking a6500 has cleaner high ISO files than your pos cam.

File: emount.jpg (266KB, 1182x840px) Image search: [Google]

266KB, 1182x840px

>>3018837
stay delusional sonykek

>>3018837
>The plastic bit is a shim, it prevents warping of the metal bits if they heat up/cool down unevenly.
>heat up
oh yes, sony knows its shit when it comes to overheating bodies

>>3018835
Yfw you look at that d750 file though.

Fujifags know all about LR and its weird antics, but keep it up lad.

>>3018839
That image shows it has the best contrast and colour separation, the a6500 and fuji have no fine detail and boundaries are muddied. The nikon just looks like the a7ii image with chroma nr turned on and the contrast knocked back.

>>3018840
Sony changed this on later cameras noob. There is no mount wobble, the shim is still there.

File: IMG_0922.png (260KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

260KB, 2048x1536px

>>3018844
Nope

>>3018846
>nope
To what?
Colour separation != dynamic range.
Your image is completely irrelevant to what i said.

Typical fuji user showing their ignorance, this is why fuji doesn't trust you with raw files and persuades you to only shoot jpeg.

File: sonyoverheating.jpg (292KB, 1600x533px) Image search: [Google]

292KB, 1600x533px

>>3018844
>There is no mount wobble, the shim is still there.
still a fucking plastic
also, funny how every sony mirrorless camera in past 5 years (except for a7s) suffered from overheating at some stage. Even when you think they might learn a few things from their mistakes, they release the brand new a6500 and even that one is/was a fucking coal burner.

>>3018850
Video is for niggers
The a6500 doesn't overheat in hot climates, in the sun doing 30min 4k videos.

But it's irrelevant, because the quality of video from other brands is a hilarious joke.

>>3018850

a6500 has no heat issues.

a6000 was the worst, it would shut down under normal usage until the firmware was updated.

Everything else has no heat issues outside of recording long 4k videos in 40+ degree weather.

>>3018857
>a6500 has no heat issues.
has no more. but it had when it launched

>>3018849
the topic at hand was sensor tuning.

>get on my level m8

>>3018870
so
>having a quarter of a stop more DR means that Nikon do it best.

Lol, no faggot, there's lots more to a sensor than dynamic range.

If you knew how to read charts properly you would see that the a7ii is better tuned for anything 1600 iso and under. Which going by my LR catalogue with my A7ii accounts for 4 and a half percent of my photos. And the A7rii assumes the position and shits all over any Nikon, in every metric.

What shoulderstrap should I get for my dlsr?
Peakdesign slide looks nice but I'm worried about the longevity of the anchors + it's pretty expensive here

>>3018881
there's plenty of cheapy chinese speed straps, I just use one of these and a more reliable caribiner to keep my camera attached

>>3018879
Spare me your kindergarten sophistry, and leave the a7rii out of it - that camera lived up to my expectations as a mirrorless d810, and is not what we're talking about, but kudos for trying to divert things.

I'll just point this out one more time. The a7ii is matched stop for stop by the a6500, and the Fuji sails away from both at high ISO. Your inability to extrapolate from this chart is amusing but ultimately not my problem.

Also, leave your fantasy photo collection out of it, I thought you were a chart nigger above all else.

>>3018879
>1/4 stop

You darent even looking at it properly, you poor fuck.

File: Untitled-1.jpg (287KB, 1622x1414px) Image search: [Google]

287KB, 1622x1414px

>>3018846
Well done on choosing 2 lines with the same colour that overlap each other, really helps to read the graph.

If anyones wondering, here's where the A7ii tuning went, into retaining shadow detail at higher iso, at the cost of a minor hit to dynamic range at every iso.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:02:09 14:43:37
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1622
Image Height	1414

>>3018864

Launch reviews were showing it record 90 minutes of 4k video without overheating.

It has no issues.

>>3018883

>fuji sails away from both

We obviously are not looking at the same comparison.

>>3018846
that extra DR is wasted if the shadows are trash as shown here >>3018889 even if you take out the possible anomaly below iso 100 on the sony, it's recovering a whole extra stop from the shadows compared to the d750 and the fuji only comes close over iso 800, but still doesn't beat it.

>this thread
fucking digicucks

File: _9211083.jpg (53KB, 625x469px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 625x469px

>>3018922
okay we get it X-Trans sucks ass. Let's all just move on to the GFX

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:

Image-Specific Properties:

>>3018235
That's not true at all, converting usd to yen gets you more money. I bought my flawless xpro 2 used with 3 total batteries, the leather grip case, and original box for only $1000 usd

>>3019121

>converting usd to yen

Not when getting paid in yen.

And Japan currently lacks the super heavy discounting the u.s. has for new stuff through the recent saled.

>>3019149
Who said anything about getting paid in yen? It's cheaper there. I could never have bought an xpro 2 for $1000 usd here in the States

>>3019002

>that dank ass 51mp Sony sensor

Sony does it again.

>>3019236
any tips senpai on how to hunt for camera gear in nipland?

>>3015601
I don't remember the name of this town, but a lot of years ago while visiting the Netherlands i've seen an awesome (gothic?) cathedral, it would be perfect covered in snow for some nice pics. I think it was in a small town with old barracks in the north of Netherlands, but i don't remember anything else,except i've visited it the same day i went to Afsluitdijk

>>3019490
Just visit a bunch of different shops I guess

>>3018881
I like the black rapid stuff, it screws into the tripod mount in the bottom of the camera and attaches to the strap with a carabinier.

>>3019490


I went to Seoul, and I thought it'd be like Japan. Sure they have good stock, but the prices are like on Ebay if not more.

>>3019425
yeah but the 100MP proper MF sized one is better

I'm interested in the xt20, any recomendations for grips? The metal one fuji has for the xt10 looks good but lol 158 dollarydoos.

File: xt10front.jpg (173KB, 1000x833px) Image search: [Google]

173KB, 1000x833px

>>3019971
Try http://www.metro-case.com/grips/multi-grip-for-fujifilm-x-t10

Should I jump into X-mount or stick with Nikon FX and try to save weight? I already have a lot of F-mount lenses.

>>3020347

There's no way that Nikon FX can compete with X-mount in terms of weight and bulk. It's impossible.

That's okay, though, because they're two different beasts.

>>3020349

I'm just not looking forward to buying equivalents to all my FX lenses just to get some value out of an X-mount body.

>>3020352

I'm also currently shooting with a D3 so I have a lot of room for improvement.

>>3020352

go buy a used x100t or x100s body to scratch that itch, my man. wait until the x100F drops so that the prices on older bodies plummet.

>>3020354

>X100

Not wide enough, I shoot mostly landscapes. I need something in the range of 20mm FX equivalent.

>>3020356
GSW690 :^)

>>3020347

Why not go e-mount instead?

You could gradually work your way into it. Your FX mount lenses would still be usable on an e-mount body with the proper adapter.

>>3020358

He wanted to save weight.

>>3020358

I could get an X-mount adapter just as easily. I'd also lose AF on several of my lenses.

That's also extra bulk and weight to make up the flange distance.

>>3020360

If I do get another FX body it will probably be a Df (smallest and lightest FX body available).

>>3020360
>I'd also lose AF on several of my lenses.

E-mount has AF adapters for F mount as long as they aren't screw driven.

>That's also extra bulk and weight to make up the flange distance.

True. I wasn't saying this as a permanent solution. It would let you use your old lenses until you get their equivalents in mirrorless.

>>3020362

I'm not sure I want equivalents in mirrorless. By the time I get even a handful of primes that's at least $1000.

FUJI FRIENDS

What is the low light performance IN VIDEO MODE of the XT2 like COMPARED to something like the Sony a7r II or a99 II cameras?

ALSO, how is the low light AF performance in video mode in low light??

>>3020363

In other words I'm not sure if I want to duplicate or match my F-mount prime collection with a bunch of X-mount lenses.

File: 20170210_183917.jpg (2MB, 4128x2322px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4128x2322px

just picked up my first proper camera.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SAMSUNG
Camera Model	SM-N900V
Camera Software	N900VVRUEOF1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	31 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	4128
Image Height	2322
Image Orientation	Bottom, Right-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2017:02:10 18:39:16
Exposure Time	1/15 sec
F-Number	f/2.2
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	1000
Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Brightness	-3.1 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	4.13 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4128
Image Height	2322
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Unique Image ID	C13QSGJ02SB

>>3020390

Why is it upside down? Are you in Australia?

>>3015008
> Recent purchases
XT2, 23/2, 50/2 as of today

That's probably the extent of my involvement with fuji. I'm mainly nikon and have way too much to actually make it worth switching. Still, it looks like a sick camera and I just wanted to pull the trigger. It'll be a nice little alt camera for me.

>>3020365
Awful.

If you're doing video fuji is NOT the company to use, sony is what you're after.

>>3020434
False. Fuji video is good since XT2 and Xpro2 release

>>3020435
Not compared to sony it's not.
I'm not being anti fuji here, but sony are probably the best on the market for video by quite a vast margin.

>>3020435
XT2 can't even do log internal..

>>3015008

Anyone got the new 23mm f/2? Please post some samples.

I have heard its very soft when doing close up focus, is this correct? thanks.

>>3020440
Why would it need to with all that control over the output, or have I misunderstood?

>>3020458
You've misunderstood, slog/slog2 are the basics you need to grade video, slog3 is now making its way into consumer products which is better still.

Think of slog like raw and every other video format as jpeg. As soon as you start editing it expect image quality to fall to shit, even if it's basic stuff like white balance.

File: rokinon-100mm-f-2.8-macro-lens.png (458KB, 800x435px) Image search: [Google]

458KB, 800x435px

>Recent purchases
What i bought during January and February:
Samyang (Rokinon in the US) 100mm f/2.8 Macro lens for Fuji X-mount.

Helios 44M-2 58mm f/2 Made in USSR lens.

Pentacon Auto Multi Coated 50mm f/1.8 Made in East Germany lens.

Two full metal Kiwi M42 to X-mount adapters.

>Wishlists
For now there is actually nothing on my to-buy-list.

File: meiji-jingu-web.jpg (835KB, 993x1500px) Image search: [Google]

835KB, 993x1500px

Bought a bunch of Fuji Acros 100 recently. Shit is cash, one of my favorite emulsions.

How does the Fuji emulation of Acros in the recent X series cameras compare to the real thing?

This is from a recent roll of the real deal, for comparison

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi

>>3020461
So they are proprietary ultra low contrast tone curves that you use as a starting point for your editing?

>>3020464
>another fuji user with a bunch of shit old lenses because the fuji ones are massively over priced.

>>3020470
Nothing alike.

>>3020472
It's more than just a tone curve, it allows you to extrapolate more data, the same way you get more data in a raw than a jpeg. I could go into it explaining video codecs but it's completely unnecessary.

If you want to do video, get something that can at least do slog2 or you'll discover its importance about 10 hours into editing and immediately regret your life choices.

>>3020475
Kek. I already regret my life choices.

>>3020473
>another fuji user with a bunch of shit old lenses because the fuji ones are massively over priced.
I also own the Fuji 23mm f/2, the Fuji 35mm f/1.4 and the Zeiss Touit 50mm f/2.8 Macro for X-mount. What's your point?

I don't know where you live, but here in Europe you can boy an old East German lens or stuff from the Soviet Union for 10 to 30 Euros. Many of these old lenses are actually really good, and many of them have a special look or bokeh. Be honest, a simple filter for your WHATEVERYOURSYSTEMIS costs more. There is nowthing wrnong with haveing little bit of fun, expecially if it costs almost nothing.

>>3020472
>proprietary tone curve

nigga what

I have GX8 that I like. Only problem I see is the lack of IBIS for video, and possibly "meh" shutter mechanism. I don't feel like spending 2k on a camera like GH5 that's too big for my taste, when video isn't even my main focus (I like take pictures of flying birds,insect macro and landscape). G80 looks to be the solution to turn my Panaleica 15 1.7 into a killing machine (since it has video ibis) , but I can't justify it either, so maybe I'll wait for GX9 (and hope it receives better 4k video features too, kek).

On lens side, I really wish either panny or oly would make a 90-100 macro lens, so it would be equivalent of 180mm sigma I have for my previous FF system. The 120mm equivalent oly is just not long enough for insect macro.

I also wish we would get that bloody T-S WA lens. I've looked so intensely to get WA zoom (I love WA zooms) either the panny 7-14 or the oly 9-18.. but seeing how there will be 8-18 f2.8-f4 (wide aperture where it matters) soon, I might have to settle with that instead. Still, I feel for cityscape a T-S would serve much better than a WA lens, and maybe even for landscape it might have some tricks.

Still waiting on my 23mm F2 to arrive at the camera store. I'm about 30th in line for one throughout the entire company.

Full disclosure I work for the store Im ordering from so I get it at cost, which is why I didn't order from b&h or another place where it would be here sooner.

>>3020473
oh boy, heres that insecure fag again who cant spend a a few days without shitposting in a fuji thread. I pity you so fucking much.

>>3020470
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bwk9xMsgQlE

>>3020470
It's not a bad looking B&W preset but I don't think it captures the real thing all that well.

Is that Meiji shrine, btw?

>>3020684
Yeah Meiji Jingu

Saving for a d7200, then going to sell old body and a lens or 2 for a sigma 18-35 f1.8

>>3020470
Nothing like it at all.

Acros is a special kind of emulsion in that it can vary wildly depending on how you shoot it or what developer you use. It's specifically a fine grain low light darling with no other emulsion on the market to compete with it. It's reciprocity failure is the best in the business.
Acros digital simulation is just that, a digital preset with no real character. You may as well just shoot raw They're completely different in every way.

>>3020824
>Acros digital simulation is just that, a digital preset with no real character.
t. never used it, just speculating

File: DSC04230tifconversion.jpg (375KB, 1080x1350px) Image search: [Google]

375KB, 1080x1350px

>>3020879
>digit BW
Not even once.

>>3020879
Hi isi.

>>3020824
Fujifilm's simulation of Acros is the best simulation of Acros around. Of course it's not the same as shooting actual Acros, be it 35mm or 120. But also, Acros doesn't go to 3200 ISO while looking as good.

Also, yellow/red/green filters and bareback. Real-time preview, w/ simulation output, EC, gay-ass saturation tweaks etc. applied, through the EVF.

It's like shooting a digital camera, instead of shooting a highly-advanced SLR with digital guts and very nice chimping. Much more WYSIWYG than looking through the prism and mirror, and previsualizing with an intensity as though Ansel Adams' ghost was gonna fall out of your b-hole any minute now.

>>3020919
You replied to the wrong poster.

>>3020879
Lol, isi, you've never used film yet spend your whole life shooting film sims extolling their greatness and similarity to film.

Have you ever considered the fact you don't have a clue what you're talking about.

>>3020966
>isi never shot film
she was forced to at least a little in college you know

Do the T20 and T2 have the same IQ?

>>3020991
>college
Lol, no.
She was there for less than 3 months. I've been on holidays longer than she was in school.

>>3021002
yep

>>3021008
3 years*

File: 1476799279025.jpg (16KB, 270x270px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 270x270px

>>3021053
>>3021008
>>3020966
You would think that with three years under her belt she could produce a better body of work than the stoner inspired drab alternative lifestyle stuff she shits out.

http://photosfujiscanttake.tumblr.com/

this triggers the bin-man

File: Untitled-1.jpg (742KB, 1200x1300px) Image search: [Google]

742KB, 1200x1300px

>>3021755
The photos on that blog are a perfect example of why not to use Fuji.

Here's a quick sampler of his images that look like ass aids.

And that chip on his shoulder, holy fucking kek.

Daily reminder that the number of cameras on the planet is exceeded only by the number of idiots unable to operate them.

>>3008662

File: 1414508754000_1086197.jpg (56KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 500x500px

Westcott 32" Rapid Box Duo Speedlite Modifier. I'd like to replace my Impact softbox, but not if the fucking rods are just going to get all bent up again.

>>3021758
ah yes, triggered just as expected.
Can't even sherrypick properly, holy fucking kek.

File: IMG_3986.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

>>3015008
Sony A6300 or Fuji X-t20 for making the jump past point and shoot into serious enthusiast/money making?

I have no Idea how the Fuji lenses and the Sony lenses compare. For a kit, saving ~$300 sounds nice to go with the sony, but again, no idea the lens situation.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Apple
Camera Model	iPhone 6s
Camera Software	9.3.2
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	29 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:06:25 21:08:34
Exposure Time	1/33 sec
F-Number	f/2.2
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Brightness	2.1 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	4.15 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4032
Image Height	3024
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>3021867
What focal lengths do you need

Also the fuji kit lens is vastly superior to the sony one and while the fuji lenses are more expensive the sony crop lineup is pisspoor

>>3021758

>>Ass aids

>>3021868
>>3021868
well. Im not 100% sure but I do know that I really enjoy and what I anticipate I'll take the most of

>>Landscape
>>Architecture
>>Portraits
>>street settings

So a nice wide angle lens for landscapes I think, and then something that would allow me a nice versatileish range in between (Like the fuji 18-55? possibly the cheaper 16-50?)

I'm definitely still learning but I'm at the point where I'm willing to put out some money to last me awhile

>>3021867
>>3021871
that a6300 kit lens is actually one of the worst kit lenses produced ever. I'd go with sigma trio of primes instead, if you want Sony and to stay on the cheap, otherwise get the x-t20 and the amazing 18-55 with it.

>>3021867
The sigma dn range are sharper than anything from fuji, despite costing a third of their cheapest lens.

The kit lens for sony is shit, but you say you want to make money so I'm gonna presume you want more than kit lens quality.

A 2nd hand a7ii is a much better camera than a new a6300 though. Full frame and ibis is gonna save you over 3 stops of noise in the right situation.

You need to decide what you want to photo before getting lens suggestions, if you say a bit of landscape a bit of portrait, a 16-35 f4, 24-70 and 70-200 f2.8 is what you want.

>>3021871
Samyang 12/2 is a great wide angle for fuji, cheap and sharp. The 18-55 is a fine lens, 16-50 is not recommended. Fuji lens system is pretty much complete, unlike sony's e mount. Don't get fooled with all the rage about the cheap sigma trio. You'll eventually want more, and end up wasting money on a dead end.
Now, the A7ii is a great camera on its own, but the fe mount lens ecosystem is still developing and most of the lenses are quite expensive and massive in size compared to fuji lenses. You can however adapt all kinds of old lenses which is fun and might rectify the situation somewhat.

>>3021930
>Suggesting a trio of gigantic professional ff lenses worth thousands of dollars for a complete noob who wants to save money and doesn't really even know what he likes.

File: znt.jpg (3MB, 4160x3120px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4160x3120px

Hello /p/ , bought this Zenit for 40 $ . Can someone tell me what those 3 rings and their numbers are for. I'm pretty new at film cameras so I'd appreciate it a lot if you guys helped. Thanks!

>>3015317
love my x-pro 2

>>3015632
xpro2 with the 16mm 1.4

>>3021695
Have this and the x-pro2. I carry both.

is weather sealed worth it ? i'm stuck either to buy xt2 or xt20

>>3021967
Yes, i can. The lens is a Helios 44M. If you want to use the lens normally, just turn the front ring to '16'. That means you can use the second ring to adjust the f-stop the full range (f/2 to f/16).

The idea behind it was to set the outer ring to the f-stop you want, then change to f/2 to get more light when you use a mirror reflex camera. Then, without having to look, they turned the aperture ring to the preselected f-stop.

You don't need (or want) this behaviour on a modern system camera. Just turn the outer ring to 16, that's it.

>>3021984
Thank you very much!

>>3021989
Thank you very much!

>>3021988
Nah, unless you're doing some extreme Icelandic Bear Gryllis shit
or those ad photos of cameras covered in snow/dust/water/etc.
XT-20 can handle some moisture. Not dust, so don't go shooting Holi

>>3021988
Well, it's not like non-weathersealed cameras die all the time. As long as you don't shoot in plain rain or in a windy desert, you'll barely experince problms with any camera at the market today. Cameras (saying modern cameras) are built for how long? 70 years now? They are all very well engineered and tight as fuck.

In fact, the weather sealing makes after some years even more problems. The sealing is nothing more as rubber. The rubber becomes hard after some years, get's cracks and holes. Would'nt be the first time a 'weather sealed' camera dies in action because the sealing failed. And then you really have the shit.

>>3022003
>>3021993
Thank you very much, maybe i will go with xt20. just confuse either the weather sealed really worth it to put extra money on it.

>>3015236
My PEN F is quick as fuck

>>3015632
Dude. Splash out for the M9. It's leaps and bounds better. Last digital camera you'll ever need.

What would be your ultimate travel camera and lens combo?

What do you pack for a longer trip?

File: D3S_0897-oblique-1200.jpg (256KB, 1200x1086px) Image search: [Google]

256KB, 1200x1086px

>>3022073
Only one camera and a single lens?

Fuji X-Pro2 and the Fuji 23mm f/1.4

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D3
Camera Software	Ver.2.02
Photographer	Ken Rockwell
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.4
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	220 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2014-05-20T20:08:36-07:00
Exposure Time	1/250 sec
F-Number	f/18.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/18.0
Exposure Bias	-2 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	Flash, Compulsory, Return Not Detected
Focal Length	200.00 mm
Image Width	1200
Image Height	1086
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Digital Zoom Ratio	1.1
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	High
Sharpness	Hard
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>3022080
isn't the 1.4 way too big for the pro?

>>3022085
Eh?

>>3022087
The 23 1.4 is a relatively huge lens. I'm thinking about selling mine and get the 2.0. I'll miss everything about the lens except the size

>>3022090
The combination is compact and understatement enough. If i have to go with only one lens i want the f1/4 and the slightly better sharpness.

Actually i may even consider to go with a compact camera like the new X100F or a similar camera from Sony.

>>3021695
What exactly am I looking at here? Is it that Ricoh with the interchangeable sensors?

>>3021973
I carry my Xt-1 and this. Hello fuji friend

>>3022164
ricoh grd1 with shade and OVF

>>3021867

Sony kit gets a bad wrap. It is relatively sharp for a kit, but has some major distortion issues (which can be fixed in post). A lot of the shit it got was from people putting it on older NEX cameras without a lens profile for it.

Read this and decide for yourself how bad it is:
>http://www.kurtmunger.com/sony_nex_pz_16_50mmid344.html

I wouldn't go either mirrorless for serious money making though.

>>3022073
>>3022080
I'd go with the 23mm F2, if I only had one lens, I'd like one that is weather sealed.

>>3022090
>The 23 1.4 is a relatively huge lens
Compared to what? The 35mm f1.4 L/L II, Canon 35/f2/is, Sigma 35mm 1.4, Nikon 35mm 1.4 G? This ain't babbies first 35mm eqv lens and it ain't your M mount non-AF motor lens either.

The only thing that it's relatively huge in comparison to is the 22mm ef-m APS-C lens. All in all, for an f1.4 35mm eqv, it's in line. If you think it's too big for an X-Pro 2 body, you may just be a rampant faggot with crippled hands.

>>3022238
i mean the only purpose for that lens is to have a tiny lens that gives a decent zoom range. it's the smallest APS-C kit lens by a large margin.

Since the major online retailers still don't have stock for the T2 and xpro2 what are the chances that fuji actually has some of the new t20 cameras available in a few weeks?

If so many people are buying them (t2, xpro2) they can't keep them in stock hire additional production employees and ramp up production and lay them off when demand drops. Like every other major company across the planet.

File: 640_d9fa8138c2ac9b00306c04c810a4080f.jpg (130KB, 632x424px) Image search: [Google]

130KB, 632x424px

>>3022376

Probably still due to sensor shortage.

Sony is just getting their own mirrorless back into proper stock.

Plus the Fuji's use older sensors, so they are far from a priority.

>>3022333
>35mm f2.8 equivalent ;)
And yes, there's plenty.

>>3022409
Cool, post some examples. Must be f1.4/t1.4 with AF motor.

>>3022376
X-T2 and X-PRO2 both seem to be readily available where I live, and this is not any sort of priority country for anything at all... Maybe the demand is smaller here, and the stuff just sells well in more active markets?

>>3022414
Fuji don't have an f1.4/t1.4 equivalent, they have an f2.8 equivalent.

>>3022417
They're is no shortage anywhere, it's shilling.

File: joke.jpg (47KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 500x375px

>>3022421
>Fuji don't have an f1.4/t1.4 equivalent, they have an f2.8 equivalent.
Yeah. I'm asking for you to post lenses from other camera systems, since you bring it up. Surely you have tonnes of 35/2.8 AF lenses that you can post, right? You wouldn't be doing this if you didn't, right?

>>3022417
Apparently plenty of people are now getting rid of their X-pro 2's, so local prices have fallen to like 1200€ at a KEH equivalent, plus some 350€ for the 35mm f/2 WR. Meaning that the 2200€ I spent has decreased in value rather sharply. But that's what I get for paying the high street price like a fool.

I didn't expect that the Matt Days of the world would have such an impact on pricing of even current gear. The camera is perfectly adequate for what it is (unlike any Leica), but the Pentax-tier interface geek-out isn't for everyone.

>>3022421
Its not f/1.4 equivalent, it is f/1.4 you fucking mongrel.

>>3022425
>Implying Matt day is testing if he can get the xpro2 for cheeper.

File: fujisensorbestsensor.png (542KB, 939x669px) Image search: [Google]

542KB, 939x669px

oh yeah baby
http://www.digitaltrends.com/photography/fujifim-faster-organic-sensor/

>>3022466
X-pro3 with organic sensor when?

>>3022466

Wont see it in production for years yet.

And when they finally do it, they will probably just use whatever organic sensor Sony produces at that time.

>>3022468
>>3022466
I'm sorry if this is a dumb question, but what is an organic sensor?
I read the article and I don't seem to understand it well.

>>3022488
It will give you diabetes if you take too much shitty photos with it.

>>3022483
suuuuure thing pal ;^)

>>3022517

Yea, cause the fuji sensor fabs are so gre....

Oh wait.

>>3022522
its a joint development between fuji and panasonic you uneducated cuck. Panasonic has been building sensors for years.

>>3015008
> Recent purchases
Canon A-1 with the 35-70mm f/3.5-4.5. Got it with a battery and a roll of Portra 160 for €149.

>Wishlists
Better glass. 50mm f/1.4, 135mm f/2.5, and something wide, like 24mm or 28mm. Probably gonna look at some legacy lenses from the CCCP as well.

>>3022468
Probably next year.

>>3017277
What were you shooting?

>>3022607
Weddings mostly and photojournalist stuff for a couple of small papers in the area.

>>3022421
The fuck are you talking about? Even if you buy into the whole "equivalent aperture" thing, a 1.4 on APS-C is equivalent to an f/2 on FF, not a 2.8.

>>3015008
Am I complete fucking idiot for even contemplating selling off my 14mm, 23 1.4, 35 1.4, 56 1.2 - in favor of getting a second xpro2 body with a 23 f2 (current xpro2 with a 35 f2) and the new 50 f2???????

I love the first generation fuji lenses, they're amazing optically, but these "f2 fujicrons" have the SIZE i'm after, with the added benefit of "weather resistance".


?????ki#l m& ?????

>>3020684
yeah was just there with my fuji xpro2 last month I'll post some pics soon, I believe I have some acros for comparison.

>>3020824
I have used both and I think it is very similar. Many of my xpro2 acros shots have better tones than that picture. Other factors still play a major role in image quality.

>>3020919
this

>>3020824
You can shoot ACROS jpeg as well as RAW on two separate sd cards.

>>3022523
...which is why all the sensors they use in consumer cameras are made by Sony?

>>3024237
Very few places have the fab labs to make sensor wafers of high enough quality to get anything larger than smartphone sensors off of it.

Nothing will change unless someone pays out for a brand new fab lab, sony have done this twice in the last 5 years, three if you count the rebuilt kumamoto lab. No one else has built any big facilities for sensor production in this time.

>>3021970
this is my favourite setup

>>3023983
>selling 56 1.2
ishygddt

>>3024237
and? what the fuck are you trying to come back at? I already told you the joint dev is for organic sensors, not regular.

>>3024351
So how are fuji/panny going to magically produce those whatever sensors for consumers without a fab? You're kinda dumb even for a fujifag.

>>3024365
>hurr organic sensors will be made the same as bayer sensors
they're going to be made out of annodized potato cornflakes or something, anon, you retard

>>3024385
Yeah but will they be gmo and gluten free for the hipsters?

>>3024394
>Yeah but will they be gmo and gluten free for the hipsters?
Somehwere in the world right now there's a vegan gearfag desperately hoping that they will be.
http://www.adox.de/Photo/may-i-use-film-if-i-am-a-vegan/

>>3024365
>already told you panasonic has a fab and been into sensor business since forever
>haha dumb fujifag, how is panasonic going to produce sensors without a fab
holy shit stop making a fool of yourself already idiot

>>3024507
>Panasonic has been building sensors
>but all they're consumer cameras use sensors bought from Sony
I think you're confused

>>3024507
http://image-sensors-world.blogspot.com/2013/12/its-official-towerjazz-acquires.html
Dude you're late. What's left of Panny fabs are only for their industrial/medical line. Same as Oly.

>>3024365
>So how are fuji/panny going to magically produce those whatever sensors for consumers without a fab?
you realize how sony's sensor fabricator works, right?

customers (including sony's digital consumer camera division) approach with plans for a sensor.
they contract the sensor fab to make X amount to whatever specs
sensor fab deliver

done

TFW too broke for 23mm f1.4 or f2 lens

TFW forever stuck with a 30 year old manual 40mm 1.8

File: IMGP0648.jpg (741KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

741KB, 1000x667px

Recent purchase was a Pentax K1 and some 90's glass to go with it. My next wishlist purchase would be a Fuji X100F so that I can have something to keep in my pocket. I love the Pentax, but I keep seeing pictures at work or on the road when I don't have it with me and I wish I had something in my pocket I could pull out and shoot with. Went hiking the other day with the Pentax and that was great — especially with its weather sealing considering it started to rain and I was among waterfalls. Pic related to the hike.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	RICOH IMAGING COMPANY, LTD.
Camera Model	PENTAX K-1
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.8 (Macintosh)
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	40 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:02:19 02:29:19
Exposure Time	1/160 sec
F-Number	f/8.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/8.0
Exposure Bias	-0.7 EV
Metering Mode	Center Weighted Average
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	40.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Distant View

>>3026376
What is a Ricoh GR.
Forget the Fuji, it's the size of a fucking house anyway.
The GR actually fits in your pocket and is
>one of the best digital cameras ever made, a true milestone, with a design usability unmatched by any camera on the market today
according to Lloyd Chambers, one of the biggest gearfagging psychopaths on the camera-related internet.

https://diglloyd.com/blog/2016/20160123_1206-RicohGR.html

>>3026432
I have a GR as my second camera. It is a really nice camera, and the picture quality it pretty good.

Two gripes thought:

- The dust, oh god it's horrid. It gets sucked into the camera. I just cleaned my sensor which was a pain in the arse to take apart and will be carrying it in a glasses case from now on in my pocket.
- No viewfinder (If you want a descent OVF they usually go for $150+) - the screen is meh.

>>3026432

>Ricoh GR

As a bonus, it also functions as a fantastic vacuum cleaner.

So I'm currently looking to jump into Fuji for the coming year. At the moment, I'm using the Nikon D5200 alongside a few DX lenses and shoot primarily street. Would it be a better idea to start off with a X100F or go for the xpro2 along with the 23 f2?

>>3015008
> Recent purchases

5D Mark III used with a BUTTLOAD of accessories and that battery grip from a former photog on Craigslist for half the price of MSRP. Low shutter count too.

> Wishlists

135mm f2. Unsure if L or Samyang. I'll wait to see what Sigma does.

> Recent photos

*sweats*

> Gearfaggotry

85mm 1.8
24-70mm 2.8
14mm 2.8
Fastfire Strap feels so good man

> Lens lusting

Idfk

> Salty Sonyfags

The Playstation 2 was the last time I felt excited for video games.

>>3026622

>jump into Fuji

Wow, that sucks. I am sorry to hear that.

>X100F or Xpro 2 w/23 f2

The Xpro 2, it isn't really even a choice. The Xpro2 blows the X100F out of the fucking water.

>>3026622
Personally, I would get the X100T. Not because it's better than the Xpro2 in any way, but because the Xpro2 costs almost double even without the lens. If you can spend $2200 for the body alone, then the Xpro2 is one of, if not the best APS-C body there is today in 2017. I would count whether I actually needed that luxury, and get an XT1 instead if I was going team Fuji. Plus some amazing lenses to go with it, like the 56 1.2, and 14 2.8.

>>3026658
You can get the xpro2 body for 1700 new in america where is this 2200 price coming from

>>3026664
You're right. Usually high end cameras come body only, but that's the price with the 23 f/2 bundle. Actually a pretty nice deal. But, the only change is that it's double the price *including the lens.

>>3026622
If you shoot primarily street, get the X100. If you don't like it and you want to return to an interchangeable camera they're super easy to sell back on in 6months-1yr or whatever without taking a huge hit. It'll save you money, it's more portable, and speaking as someone who sold off his Xpro1 after buying an X100s, a lot more fun to shoot with.

>>3026432
I'd agree, the x100 is not pocketable unless you're using no filters or attachments, and you have a jacket with a fairly large pocket. I love mine, but I carry it with a neck strap. Once you add on the attachment that lets you mount filters/lens hoods, you're well past the point that you could pocket it.

>>3026444
Dust is my main reason for not buying a GR...I often think about buying one of the older ones (like the III) for cheap because I'll take it to work where I'm outdoors a lot of the time, carry it in pockets, and generally just trash it. Such a shame because it seems like a killer camera otherwise.

File: .png (1MB, 1093x839px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1093x839px

FFS Fuji. Stop cucking yourself out to Sony

>>3026859
>cucking yourself by using the work cuck

>>3026872
cuck yourself cuck

>>3026859
>Fujinon have mentioned that they will eventually make both these lenses available in the X Mount used in Fujifilm’s “X Series” of digital cameras, but there are no plans to make them in any other mount. Newsshooter

>Fs5/7 being the most popular and used amongst owner operators
>No Fuji x kino
>Xmount coming soon

Sounds like Fuji could offer a free mount change when you buy the fuji xTrogenhorse

File: 1487799886732.png (99KB, 500x365px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 500x365px

>Fuji users
Jesus fucking christ.

File: 09740034.jpg (2MB, 2048x1358px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2048x1358px

>>3026376
>>3026432
>>3026444

I've been considering the Ricoh GR, but I'd rather wait for whenever they release a new version of it and solve their dust problem.

Maybe a Fuji X70?

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NORITSU KOKI
Camera Model	EZ Controller
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.8 (Macintosh)
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Image Created	2017:02:21 23:00:45
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>3027119
Wait for a x80 man

>>3027119
The X70 is a great camera. I doubt Fuji has much up its sleeve design-wise for its successor so it might be worthwhile to spring for one if you find the right deal.

>>3027127

The X70 hasn't even been out for six months. It'll probably be another year or two from now before we see the X80.

>>3027171
X80 starts hitting the rumormill, so its speculated for a later release this year maybe. X70 was released 2016 february though.

>>3017280
Faggot!
Did you try it?

File: IMG_20170225_133413_535.jpg (2MB, 2336x3919px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2336x3919px

Just found a yashica t3 in very good conditions for 5€
Only thing that bothers me is that the viewer is too far right of the camera
Shot 2 rolls with that.1 roll on the contaxg2 and 1 roll with the fuji mini wide.
Couldnt develop because my develop place was closed saturday afternoon...
Will get it done tomorrow, scann on the v700 and post muh snapshits on my beloved /p/
I love you /p/ !!!