Dumping my shit, some new stuff mixed with some old stuff.

>>3010451
ima use this as my telefone background thanks : )

File: _DSF1069.jpg (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

>>3010470
have a higher res version friend

i like your eye, but youre making a mistake here. youre mixing old with new. can you identify old and new stuff for us? then we can see your progression or degression, so feedback can be more on point.

>>3010452
tried converting and editing a b&w version. which one do you guys prefer?

File: 15-2.jpg (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

>>3011993
woops

File: 20.jpg (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

>>3010908
my bad

>>3010453
>>3010454
>>3010456

these are a year old, rest are from two months ago to now. there's other old ones mixed in, I'll point them out.

File: 25.jpg (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

next seven ones are from last year

>>3012034
This is great. The thumbnail had me fooled, thinking the bushes was some sort of reflection.

File: 26.jpg (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

>>3012036
cheers

File: 30.jpg (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

back to recent pics

File: 33.jpg (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

>>3012507

File: 44.jpg (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

these two are two years old

>>3012557

Which are your camera specs, anon?

File: 56.jpg (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

>>3012566
that one's expired portra shot on a rolleicord, most of these are 35mm though

File: IMG_20170130_215838.jpg (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

>>3012541
Hey man, used your photo as a reference for a drawing. I Hope you like it. (Made a few mistakes)

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	ONEPLUS A3003
Camera Software	Google
Equipment Make	OnePlus
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2017:01:30 21:59:01
Image Width	2207
Image Height	3507
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
F-Number	f/2.0
Focal Length	4.26 mm
Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Exposure Mode	Auto
Image Height	4640
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Program	Not Defined
White Balance	Auto
Image Width	3480
Metering Mode	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Brightness	0 EV
ISO Speed Rating	320
Exposure Time	1/25 sec

File: IMG_20170130_220819.jpg (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

Improved it a little

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	ONEPLUS A3003
Camera Software	Google
Equipment Make	OnePlus
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2017:01:30 22:09:01
Image Width	3142
Image Height	4190
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB
F-Number	f/2.0
Focal Length	4.26 mm
Lens Aperture	f/2.0
Exposure Mode	Auto
Image Height	4640
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Exposure Program	Not Defined
White Balance	Auto
Image Width	3480
Metering Mode	Spot
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Brightness	0 EV
ISO Speed Rating	1000
Exposure Time	1/17 sec

File: 59.jpg (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

>>3012597
>>3012600
looks great bro, keep it up

>>3012038
Good contrast between the lighting on the wall.
>>3012526
That one poofy cloud is a nice element.
>>3013674
Not a good photo in itself, but the colors make the contents of it aesthetically pleasing.

File: hmph.gif (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

>When your photos look like snippets from 1960s agriculture textbooks

>>3010440
>>3010433
>>3010443
>>3012509
>>3012541
>>3012550
sick ass hell man

are they super low res on purpose? I like your use of silhouettes and stuff. The resolution puts a nice emphasis on it.

You seem pretty capable of thinking about light and shadow, lines, color, and shape.

Love the stuff that deals with texture.

File: 63.jpg (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

>>3013702
thanks?

>>3013706
pretty much

>>3013682
>>3013710
cheers

File: 64.jpg (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

>>3013702
got any examples actually? sounds dope

Gotta say I looked through most and over all I like the look of these, not all but most, good job.

>>3013734
this one here is my favorite so far.
It reminds me of a great book by Marguerite Duras called "Emily L."

I feel like you would make a good zine or book. go for it n__n

File: 66.jpg (1B, 486x500px)

1B, 486x500px

>>3013737
>>3013802
>>3013940
cheers m80s, nice to get some positive feedback

File: 70.jpg (131KB, 650x436px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 650x436px

guess it's time to start tripping again

File: 71.jpg (85KB, 650x443px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 650x443px

out of good recent shots so I'll post some of my first shots (from 2 years ago) which I still like

File: 72.jpg (52KB, 650x432px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 650x432px

first decent shot I remember taking

one of the few threads (not only currently, but in months) that showcases the genuine eye of the photographer. these feel intimate and real, both in approach and subjects. thanks for sharing m8.

I love most of these, you have a nice eye, hope to see more of it. What b/w films are you using?
Specifically here:
>>3016113
>>3012548
>>3012046
>>3012041 (my fav, where is this?)

File: 75.jpg (100KB, 650x465px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 650x465px

>>3017858
thanks, I really appreciate it


>>3018997
kodak vision 3 500t (converted to b&w)
hp5 in ethol ufg
tri-x in edwal 12
apx 100 (the old kind) in diafine (swiss alps)

overall, I regret trying so many films and developers and wish I had just stuck with one combination and focused on restricted parameters like exposure, development time, agitation and temperature, all of which generally end up having more influence on your image than film and developers.

>>3013706
>are they super low res on purpose?
You will find file size is inversely proportionate to photo quality on the internet.
Newfags think their 5184x3456 snapshits are glorious, oldfags realise an image that actually fits within the viewable area of most computer screens looks best, they don't want their work stolen in reproducible sizes, and they don't want critique to go something like "you missed focus on this cunthair here, opinion discarded".

>>3017849
This is some great eye candy

>>3019174
Ah yes, pre-2012 (exp.) APX 100. Got about 40m of it still in the fridge. Too magical to use for anything, which is presumably how I got to it for the price of the bulk loader that came with it.

File: 77.jpg (122KB, 484x650px) Image search: [Google]

122KB, 484x650px

>>3019351
try some silvermax, it's basically old apx 100 with some slight changes to the emulsion (slightly finer grain, slightly higher contrast, same spectral sensitivity). it also works well for reversal because it's coated on a clear base (like scala 200x)

>>3012034
>>3012038
>>3012524
>>3012541
>>3012550
>>3019174
these are also apx/silvermax

File: 78.jpg (110KB, 650x499px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 650x499px

the accidental symmetry made this one interesting.

>>3011995
Colour for sure

File: 81.jpg (88KB, 650x490px) Image search: [Google]

88KB, 650x490px

>>3020328
yeah, I think so too, just testing my b&w processing skills.

https://youtu.be/NRFTSh56gEE

How does this look for documentary Style music Vid?

I really like everything. I am not a photographer nor anything related to it, so I can't really advice something. But all in all, I liked them. They are not that bad actually ((:

File: 84.jpg (79KB, 464x650px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 464x650px

>>3023172
cheers mate

just finished developing a new roll, got a lot of keepers I think. I'll post some tonight if I get around to scanning them

File: 85.jpg (109KB, 800x541px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 800x541px

delivering

all of these were taken in one sitting (whole roll within a 2 hour window), not as consistently good as my previous shots but playing around with angles, positions and whatnot

File: 86.jpg (86KB, 800x538px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 800x538px

fomapan 200 in rodinal 1+25

File: 96.jpg (77KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 800x533px

done

half frame slide film coming next week, bump if you want to see more

>>3026833
that shit looks badass. i wanna pilot it.

>>3026833
>>3026835
>>3026836
>>3026843
what film is this. your yellows look weird.

>>3026898
just a horse trailer bro

>>3026900
wittner chrome 200d, which is the same emulsion as agfa rsx 200 ii

File: 104.jpg (494KB, 800x595px) Image search: [Google]

494KB, 800x595px

damn, forgot to finish dumping. this'll be the last set, probably wont post for a while after this

File: 109.jpg (306KB, 800x585px) Image search: [Google]

306KB, 800x585px

>guess exposure
>guess reciprocity failure
>don't bracket
wew

File: 111.jpg (380KB, 800x601px) Image search: [Google]

380KB, 800x601px

later faggots

>>3029841
cool stuff.