Thread replies: 8
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: 1398888295750.png (175KB, 500x301px) Image search:
[Google]
175KB, 500x301px
The absolute worst kind of photographer is the brainwashed ideologue. They disdainfully refer to the most interesting photos as "snapshots" while pursuing pointless arbitrary subjects and scenes they've been told are appropriate: urban grit and grime (esp in b&w), wet concrete, unnattractive people on the street, unnecessary shallow DOF, pointless macros of uninteresting objects, etc. In other words nothing that a normal sane person would be remotely interested in. Want to create a good photographer? Find an ordinary person who's never been corrupted by the above, give them a camera and let them use it. Then go back with them and look through the photos and teach them technique (how to use the camera optimally without the ideological crap), and they will be far ahead of the brainwashed artsy-fartsy types.
>>
Which one of your photos got ripped apart.
>>
The absolute worst kind of photographer is the cunt who starts a thread on a photography imageboard with an image that isn't a photograph he took
>>
nice salt, OP.
>>
>>3007246
>his own children playing in the park
>fucking birds
>hdr 14mm stormclouds rolling in over city, from the local lookout carpark
>jetty & 10-stop ND
All of these.
>>
>>3007245
Itt: delusions of grandeur
Show us your photo mateo, stop being A puss
>>
>>3007245
I say just shoot whatever you find interesting and practice making it look better. One of the most important things in photography is the subject and not everyone will find the subjects you choose interesting.
>>3007261
>responds to OP's cliches with more cliches
You're not really proving him wrong, my dude.
Thread posts: 8
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1