took some photos today, tell me if theyre total shit or not

File: IMG_1866.jpg (182KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

182KB, 1024x683px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: IMG_1816.jpg (180KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

180KB, 1024x683px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: IMG_1826.jpg (304KB, 683x1024px) Image search: [Google]

304KB, 683x1024px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

>>3001809
>women closing their eyes as a 'pose'
This shits me. I'm getting used to it, but the number of shots I cull as rejects because some millenialbitch thinks closing her eyes in every shot looks cool, and is distinguishable from a shit shot where someone blinked.......
fffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffffff

p.boring.
Also 4 photos isnt a days worth of photos. Nothing like.
But these two have some redeeming qualities.
>>3001814
>>3001806

File: IMG_1830.jpg (231KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

231KB, 1024x683px

>>3001817
thank you my friend i appreciate your input. I have tons of shots though that im still going through

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: IMG_1847.jpg (298KB, 683x1024px) Image search: [Google]

298KB, 683x1024px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

>>3001824
aaaaaand then you made me open a 4MB image...
*sigh*

File: IMG_1860.jpg (226KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

226KB, 1024x683px

>>3001825
noone made u do anything stop blaming the world for your mistakes. here u go

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

>>3001816
slap the fuckers in the face for wasting the grand master photographers time is what i say

File: IMG_1869.jpg (316KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

316KB, 1024x683px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

File: IMG_1825.jpg (178KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

178KB, 1024x683px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi

they arent total shit, but they are catsby tier aka. photos of your friends that hold interest only to you. exception would be if there were hot girls in them, but there arent any.

File: DSC_3633wip.jpg (194KB, 799x1200px) Image search: [Google]

194KB, 799x1200px

its very old but i still like it

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	NIKON CORPORATION
Camera Model	NIKON D90
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS2 Windows
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/1.7
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Color Filter Array Pattern	842
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	75 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	2868
Image Height	4310
Number of Bits Per Component	16, 16, 16
Compression Scheme	Unknown
Pixel Composition	RGB
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Data Arrangement	Chunky Format
Image Created	2014:02:18 22:23:28
Exposure Time	1/200 sec
F-Number	f/9.0
Exposure Program	Manual
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Flash
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	50.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	799
Image Height	1200
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Manual
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

>>3002212
fuck wrong thread

>>3002214

no one would have noticed.

>>3001819

Needs his faggot ass kicked.

>>3002212
Marginally above average despite B&W and the framing.

At least not a bad way to pose an interesting-looking model.

>>3001804
>>3001818
>>3001819
Average.

>>3001806
>>3001809
>>3001814
>>3001829
>>3001832
>>3002178
Shit.

Overall suggestions:
- Loosen up on that damn color grading.

- Better instruct your models how to pose or at least shoot bursts you get more good moments.

- Use more RF triggered lights (preferably with some skill, but even just having more of them would probably help).

- Better lens and/or body. IQ seems to be really fucking bad like auntie's old Olympus or Canon Rabal might have shot it.

>>3002222
nice digits