Hi fags, I am selling this Leica Minilux Tintin limited edition,

you should ask over nine thousand

>>2998803
maybe $400 max
who the fuck wants some faggy belgian cartoon character on their overpriced point and shoot

>>2998814
>normal ones selling for 1000$
>asks 400$ for the limited version

sell me your gear, fag

File: IMG_0816.png (665KB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

665KB, 2048x1536px

>>2998803
Good luck OP!

File: IMG_0815.png (1MB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x1536px

>>2998803
And here's a free reality check ;)

>>2998803
"Collectable" shit is only as valuable as the delusional fags that make them out to be. Never will understand it.

>"Oh yeah? This, this is a rare, only 10 ever made... what? Oh no, it functions identically to the common one, there is only a little sticker differentiating it from everything else". "Yes, it was totally worth it".

>>2998845
Heh, I payed 100€ for it, it someone beats the 1000€ i'll sell it

>muh tintin

>>2998803
>Tintin

i want one with marmaduke engraved on it.

>>2998852
OP will buy yours for €1k

>>2998847
so its art?

>>2998868
>Plastic toy camera
>art

Ok, but it's implied function is of a camera, to take (mediocre), pictures. If someone wants one to put on their mantelpiece, that's fine.

But to any normal person - it's just retarded. No one in their right mind would get something an order of magnitude more expensive because someone spaffed gold on it or some shit.

>>2998886

> plastic
> mediocre

You must be a digifag who has never touched the glorious titanium Minilux and its 40mm Summarit.

Not OP

>>2998855
>tfw no Heathcliff Leica

>>2999121
>tfw no leica rubbing hands jew edition

>>2999119
>40mm """""Summarit"""""
>a 4/3 moderate wide angle virtually indistinguishable from most every prime lensed compact ever made
>glorious
You make me kek, anon.
>>2998803
OP, your shit ain't worth shit if it's not a full outfit.
Bad luck with the sale, and I hope an asteroid destroys your house and everyone you love, you cockmongling faggot.

File: dsc04261.jpg (1MB, 1536x2048px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1536x2048px

>>2998886
>plastic can't be art
a fucking shovel can be art

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SONY
Camera Model	DSC-H10
Camera Software	QuickTime 7.7.1
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/3.5
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2012:07:21 13:45:26
Exposure Time	1/40 sec
F-Number	f/3.5
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	800
Exposure Bias	0.7 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	6.30 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2048
Image Height	1536
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Hard
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Hard

>>2999203
that's an artfully designed snow shovel. I guess it belongs in a gallery if it's like an overpriced hipster tool gallery. I wouldn't put it in the local moma

>>2999203
>Not understanding Dadaism

>>2999207
It is in the MoMA though.
Duchamp is a genius i guess.
>>2999208
>implying
i'm actually an arts student and he's my favourite artist (oh the irony), let me joke around a bit please.

>>2999203
>shovel clearly made of patrician timber and steel
F A T A L I T Y

>>2999212
>It is in the MoMA though
you don't say.

File: wZOz3mo.jpg (766KB, 1760x1730px) Image search: [Google]

766KB, 1760x1730px

>>2998823
Reminds me of that time someone painted a WWII rifle with mlp.
>but but muh limited edition.
Stfu

I think my mint condition shitty plastic Ford branded toy camera is worth more.