Is this actually good Photography? This guy has thousands of followers and has actually nailed himself gigs with companies like Bose. Do you guys think this guy is a proficient? https://twitter.com/Brandonwoelfel/status/813990559819923456
jesus christ thats a lot of fucking bokeh
I love bokeh in general.
His pictures are over-processed garbage, literally trash.
He has his style.
People like his style.
People with money like his style and hire him.
What's the problem?
Doesn't conform to your notions of style?
>>2992296
that doesnt mean I can't say its utter shit
>>2992299
Not at all.
But you don't have 50k people spilling their jizz over your shapshits. And when he's cashing that Bose check, you think he pauses in hope of every random faggot's approval?
And nice trip dubs.
>>2992303
What a cuck you are. Just kill yourself.
>>2992273
>is this good photography
Quality is subjective, the majority of people like his shots, so, yes, he is good.
If you thought this was over processed, check out blair bunting, he gets massive contracts and loooveeeessss the clarity slider.
If you've ever worked in a good restaurant you'll know there's food the public enjoy and then there's food chefs enjoy. The public like things on the safe side, chefs like eating things that challenge them. Photography is no different, and if you want public recognition, the first thing you need to do is identify what the public want.
The way see it when he dies none of his photography will be remembered he did nothing to earn a legacy sure right now hes liked when he passes noone will care. His shots had no lasting impact on humanity.
>>2992318
>why be rich in life, when you can be meaningful in death
Because you can't buy fresh kicks when you're dead.
>>2992322
Leaving a legacy is all that matters why die forgotten.
>>2992273
he has a gimmick with lights and bokeh. photos look impressive to the common pleb. if you look at his daylight photos, where there are no lights or bokeh balls everywhere, they are 1st week camera user portraits, they are very bad portraits with "gorgeous pp" aka party HDR and gimmicky lightning.
>>2992329
Because you won't be there to revel in your glory.
Why lead a life that serves to give meaning to others instead of yourself?
>>2992340
lol anon wtf do you even brain? that guy is the one giving meaning to others, he gives meaning to that brand and to their customers, but none to himself (unless he fulfills his life with shooting vapid whores holding christmas lights), he is whoring his time and skills as a freelancer, nothing else.
>>2992345
You mean he's having fun and making bank?
If i did what i loved everyday, people from all over the world appreciated what i did and i could afford to do whatever i want from the money my passion brought in, i would call that a pretty meaningful life.
Much better than being ignored until your dead only for spindly art college cretins to bicker over your snapshots underlying message.
>>2992273
define 'good'.
Thousands of people say yes, he's good.
You seem jealous
>that clarity slider rape
What is he shooting with at 3:18? Looks like a weird CD.
https://youtu.be/Yo15u3SWSrg?t=3m18s
Also, noob question: What does shooting with a CD in front of your lens do?
>>2992296
The word you're looking for is aesthetic.
I think its overprocessed garbage but normies would probably eat it up.