remember, /p/... as time passes, it won't matter what body

It's not about depth of field, anon, it's about the depth of the feeling.

>>2989003

>It's not about depth of feeling, anon, it's about the depth of love

>>2988994
sure, but what's a nice feeling photo good for if it's grainy, moved and out of focus?

>>2989043
feel

File: PAR43607.jpg (36KB, 425x627px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 425x627px

>>2989043

File: henri_cartier_bresson_bicycle.jpg (85KB, 828x555px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 828x555px

>>2989078
>grainy
it's a b'n'w scan, it will look grainy no mater what
>moved
it's not moved, subject is moving and the shutter speed was slow, that's propably what the tog was going for, like picrel
>out of focus
it's in focus

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Created	2016:12:25 17:39:38

File: 1482682509690.jpg (30KB, 425x627px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 425x627px

>>2989078
you wouldn't like this pic if it looked like this

File: umadbabe.jpg (82KB, 337x490px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 337x490px

>>2989078
>>2989095

File: whywouldibemadfriend.jpg (25KB, 337x490px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 337x490px

>>2989098

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CC 2015 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	96 dpi
Vertical Resolution	96 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:25 18:25:07
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	337
Image Height	490

What a clueless and cringe-worthy statement. Hurr durr it's about feel. FEEL. You pathetic idiots. Go feel yourselves somewhere else. Stop sucking dicks and call it art. You're just swamp cunts who float aimlessly through space.

>>2989098
>>2989109

>>2989155
well... this one certainly is mad...

>>2989095
I love it

File: 1482548256388.png (587KB, 735x493px) Image search: [Google]

587KB, 735x493px

>>2989043
Looking at

>>2989095
I don't like it either way. It's a brilliantly composed Nothing.

>>2989155
gearfag spotted

Shut the fuck up. You sound like one of those pretentious photographers that will take a picture of dog shit and try to say that it "shows the state of the eco system in current times" or some other pretentious crap like that. The I ly time a photographer should be pretentious about their work is if they are applying for a place and want to make themselves sound better. You're not applying for a role. Fuck off.

>>2989314
Literally a newfag.

6/10 decent bait

>>2988994
where is this from?

>>2989322
Says the moron who cant into photography

True statement OP, 100% agree.

>>2989436

didn't see your photo thread up every day since May

>select all the food

>>2989585
yummy

>>2988994
>t depth of feeling, anon, it's about the depth of love
100% agree with OP

>>2989585

Boy I sure am triggered! You got me, man!

>>2989155

>Projecting this much

lol fuck off INTJ fedorafag

File: you know man.jpg (359KB, 520x1247px) Image search: [Google]

359KB, 520x1247px

>>2991322
>>2988994
I concur as well.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop CS6 (Windows)
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	96 dpi
Vertical Resolution	96 dpi
Image Created	2014:09:25 11:22:05
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	520
Image Height	1247

>>2988994
It will matter when someone else gets the Pulitzer because your ISO was too high.

>>2991441
You're not getting a Pulitzer

>>2991443
Why would I?
I'm one of those /vid/ faggots.