I'm editing the last couple months worth of photos right now. /p/ usually has interesting opinions so lay it on me
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.4 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:12:21 15:23:55
resizing a bit...
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.4 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:12:21 15:27:14
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.4 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:12:21 15:27:19
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.4 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:12:21 15:27:24
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.4 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:12:21 15:27:27
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.4 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:12:21 15:27:29
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.4 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:12:21 15:27:32
that's one day. I'll post more later
>/p/ usually has interesting opinions so lay it on me
drop the trip, for starters, cum nugget.
>>2987408
I love you guys
>>2987377
this looks super awkward, grass is way too green and everything else is way too muted, keep the ampersand the way it is
>>2987368
Pentax? You could have cropped the rail under.
>>2987372
It looks like it is lacking a subject, a convergence of the line of interest. Could be wider too.
>>2987377
>Selective desaturation
NO.
>>2987379
Oh wow, a cool pictures on /p! Nothing more to say about it, I like
>>2987381
You should have came closer. It's boring
>>2987385
>yawn*
>>2987391
Fucking come closer again, you could have had a far greater pic there.
>>2988409
Fuck you.
>>2987377
no, no, no that doesn't work
>>2987379
this is good
>>2988412
>nikon
>its a walk through the park, the buildings, the train, they all converge on the path ahead
>fair enough
>thanks!
>I just love the guy on the right... his expression, how he is distanced from them, he's obviously like wtf did I stumble into
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.4 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:12:25 10:07:53
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.4 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:12:25 10:37:25
also, this set IS pentax
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.4 (Windows) Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 72 dpi Vertical Resolution 72 dpi Image Created 2016:12:25 11:45:08
I think what is lettering down most of these shots is composition and you've tried to edit them to try and make them more interesting than they actually are.
The OP photo is a prime example, your eyes don't know what to look at, there's nothing interesting in the photo, no converging lines, no novelty to speak of, just distracting elements with no focus.
>2017