I know this is probably taboo to ask on /p/, but if /p/ HAD to

The one you have with you

VSCO now does raw so probably anything but all tests show that apple os is much faster and smoother. so either iphone 6s plus or google pixel

>>2986793
>not the 7 plus with two lenses

Also vsco is total trash.

>>2986793
Is the Pixel really worth it tho

The rest of the hardware specs are subpar for the price and iPhone 7 takes better pics in low light

File: IMG_3383.jpg (289KB, 800x572px) Image search: [Google]

289KB, 800x572px

>>2986798
If you are buying a phone with camera as a priority in decision making then yes. not sure if there are tests on raw anyway so I would personally get iPhone, they're just so good. Only apple product I own so it's more like iPhone praise rather than Apple praise.
>>2986795
Two lens is a meme fuck off back to /g/. You'd probably like two dicks instead of one kek. You could use procam and import into snapseed but really vsco is fine great for quick edits

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Apple
Camera Model	iPhone 6s Plus
Camera Software	Snapseed 2.14.141428617
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	29 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Pixel Composition	Unknown
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:20 20:30:28
Exposure Time	1/25 sec
F-Number	f/2.2
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Brightness	1.5 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Auto
Focal Length	4.15 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	800
Image Height	572
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2986809
You wouldn't have two dicks if given the opportunity?

Panasonic CM1
All other answers are from non photographers

>>2986810
No homo?

>>2986809
>Two lens is a meme fuck off back to /g/.

sounds like sour grapes, boy-o.

>>2986820
dude whatever im fine with my a7rii shitboi. iphone 6s pluis is nice though when i dont have it with me. wouldnt want 2 lens which is known to fuck up photos

>>2986784
panasonic cm1

>>2986784
7plus, Google Pixel and moto snap with hasselblad attachment.

>>2986829
>moto snap with hasselblad attachment.
I've heard mixed reviews on that

>>2986828
>>2986814
I never even knew Panasonic made phones, what the fuck

>>2986822

Insecure and salty as fuck.

Triggered right in the pussy lmao

>>2986784
Whatever phone you own.

>>2986844
They make the only phone ever with a real camera. CM1 has a 2.8 lens on a 1" sensor, specs which obliterate anything any other phone has done, gimmick or no gimmick.

>>2986784
Pixel or V20
V20 probably has bootloop problems but the dual camera, DAC and manual controls are not paired by anything in the market atm.
Pixel has good stabilisation and i wanna do video.

>>2986831
Really only good for zoom otherwise it's trash from what I heard

Nokia 808

To this day, the most fun I've had with a phone camera.

File: 2013-07-07-1218-3.jpg (407KB, 1000x563px) Image search: [Google]

407KB, 1000x563px

>>2989238

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi

Back in the day I bought the lumia 925 because of the camera. it was a truly remarkable thing,kicked all other phone cameras asses that I compared it with. And please note, compared at when it was released. Sadly I broke the screen and it got wet because I work at sea. Now I have a fairphone. It sucks balls on all levels. Everything in it is crap, including the camera....

>>2986784
Any phone with a camera on it.

Even the "best" phone cameras are worse or equal to a good point and shoot.

What's the FASTEST phone camera? My phone takes 5 seconds from flicking the screen on to shooting a photo.

p much any answer that isn't the lg v20 is a wrong answer imo

>>2989258
dayum got any more pics

>>2989306
I still have my lumia 925, it was good when it first came out but I wouldn't say it is as good as you described. The IQ got quite soft over time, I doubt they used sapphire glass on the front element. Using an iphone SE atm, pretty good but I miss the camera button

>>2990419
iphones have pretty snappy cameras desu

>>2991113
enjoy your bootloop

I have a LG G5 and i have to say, the camera on it is pretty good, plus it got a wide angle too that can be very useful.

So far i've loved using it.

Google Pixel
Samsung Galaxy S7/Edge
iPhone 7+

Top three, in that order. I have the Galaxy S7, and I'm extremely impressed with the image quality, especially in low light.

File: IMG_20161031_211627~2.jpg (2MB, 3637x2207px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3637x2207px

I have a nexus 6 and the camera is quite nice. No good photos on it at the moment, but the focus is somewhat adjustable with decent depth, the photos are very clear, And it does very well in low lighting. (Pic related with minimal adjustments) the colours pop very nicely, for a phone camera

>>2986788
/thread

>>2991297
how did u take this picture is it mounted on a drone?

>>2986784
>which phone would it be?

The one I have with me.

All phone cameras are equally shit.

File: IMG_20161218_090635.jpg (4MB, 4000x2992px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 4000x2992px

>>2991360
Friend of mine lives on the 21st floor

The area was quite dark in real life, but the Nexus does a very good job for night time photos as far as phones go.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Camera Model	CandyCamera
Equipment Make	JP Brothers
Image-Specific Properties:
Focal Length	3.41 mm
Light Source	Unknown
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Metering Mode	Unknown
Image Width	4000
White Balance	Auto
Image Height	2992
Image Created	2016:12:18 09:06:35

More importantly, any android programs that let me set exposure, focus, etc manually and let me use RAWs?

>>2986784
I bought a iPhone 6s+. I have been pretty happy with it. I take way more pics with it than I did with my dslr.

Nokia 5310i

File: IMG_20161207_081337.jpg (2MB, 3968x2976px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3968x2976px

My Honor 8 is brrrredy gud :-D

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	HUAWEI
Camera Model	FRD-L09
Camera Software	FRD-L09C432B131
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	27 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Width	3968
Image Height	2976
Number of Bits Per Component	8, 8, 8
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:12:07 08:13:38
Exposure Time	3/50 sec
F-Number	f/2.2
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	1600
Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Brightness	0 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Light Source	Daylight
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	4.50 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3968
Image Height	2976
Rendering	Custom
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Gain Control	None
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal
Subject Distance Range	Unknown

Pixel for IQ and that glorious video stabilization
LG V20 for the dual camera and the video and audio manual features
>>2986822
>wouldnt want 2 lens which is known to fuck up photos
How the fuck is having two lenses "known to fuck up photos"?
If you walk with your camera and two lenses in the bag your photos are automatically fucked up?
kys

File: IMG_1109.jpg (2MB, 3857x2893px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3857x2893px

I've got a 7 Plus, finding the second lens really useful.

Does anybody think it could be hypothetically possible to fit a properly-sized sensor (maybe like 4/3 rather than FF) in a phone somehow?

File: IMG_0744.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

>>2994811

>>2994811
they have, look at >>2986814

Sold like shit though

File: IMG_0720.jpg (729KB, 4018x1613px) Image search: [Google]

729KB, 4018x1613px

>>2994812

>>2994813
Didn't realise this existed.

I would probably get one if it ran iOS. I don't really mind a massively protruding camera if your phone is pretty much a fully-fledged P&S.