Hey guys. I recently discovered i had a talent for photography,

>>2978038
>I recently discovered i had a talent for photography
Why did you arrive at that conclusion?

>>2978039
My mom told me they are good

>>2978044
my mum says the same thing about my photos. then i show them on /p/ and everyone convulses in a shitfit about how awful my pictures are

>>2978039
Should i post the pics?

Also, can you post facebook pics here without being doxxed?

>>2978044
Really funny, kill youre self

>>2978050
Why would I want to doxx you?

>>2978051
Just wanted to see if anyone cares about that. This is 4chan.

Or maybe I'm just a bit paranoid from the weed.

>>2978049
>then i show them on /p/ and everyone convulses in a shitfit about how awful my pictures are

That's because /p/ hates everything. Why would your mother lie to you?

But then again you guys may be right and in full of shit , cut who cares. Wanna see pics?

>>2978056
U WANNA SEE U WANNA SEE?
U SURE? REALLY? WANNA SEE IT?

fuck off, just throw your stuff down in a thread without any of this set-up bullshit, or flush them down the RPT if you only have a few pics to share

>>2978061
Alright faggot, calm your tits. I'm working on it

>It had one of those zoom things(objectives?) that was wider and i guess had automatics light configurations

do you mean a lens?

File: FB_IMG_14809793115104912.jpg (109KB, 480x317px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 480x317px

>>2978068
Yes thank you that's the thing
Language barrier i guess

File: FB_IMG_14809796783022906.jpg (120KB, 480x317px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 480x317px

They're a bit dark and grim, it was cloudy out

>>2978071
>>2978073
They're in focus. Congrats. Not sure if talent is exactly the word I would use.

You can get a low tier camera with a zoom lens for that price, or an older mid tier one. Ask in the gear thread.

>>2978079
Thanks buddy!

For that shit you can use your phone camera fine enough.
You can always get better gear when you know what you're doing.

>>2978080
DIE DIE DIE

>>2978087
*Autistic screeching*

>>2978038
ive never hit a woman. i think shed be my first

>>2978112
If you find a girl willing to do slapping during sex, it's pretty fun IMO

>>2978044
you know moms tell you youre good even when youre shit, right?

>>2978127

"willing to do slapping" lmao

>>2978038
second hand tamorn 28-75 f2.8 and 2nd hand body of your choice.

The lens can be had for a little over 100 eurodollars and will last for as long as you want to use it, the body is largely irrelevant, image quality is all incredibly similar from anything within the last 5 years.

Few things to be aware of.
You can go Nikon, Pentax or Canon.
Canon has the worst image quality due to their sensors being a bit behind, nikon and pentax both use sensors from sony and will give nigh on identical images.

The Nikon D3XXX range are a waste of money as they don't have a screw drive autofocus, serverely limiting your lens choices, the D5XXX and D7XXX range do and are definitely worth the extra cost.

Pentax may well be the most affordable option, and the one I would recommend, especially if you find a good priced K5, they are very hard wearing, most are fully weatherproofed and imo much nicer to use thanks to a better array of dials and buttons. Also, if you do find a k5/k3 in your price range they have "ibis" this allows you to take handheld shots in low light with much less blur. pentax has it's downfalls, there's limited things in the way of an upgrade path (although the K1 is the motherfucking boss of FF dslrs) and their lens selection is a bit limited compared to the big 2 brands.

megapixels aren't important, "full hd" is 2 megapixels, 12MP is more than you will need unless you want to print bigger than A3 (pro tip, big prints look tacky unless they're fucking amazing, you're not going to do anything fucking amazing for a while)

The other option, that may interest you is the Sony mirrorless range, because they have an electronic viewfinder, as opposed to just a fancy window, you get an exact preview of how your shot will look, you may find this helps you grasp the exposure triangle much quicker and get the shots you want first time, you're going to be stuck with just a 2nd hand body and a shit lens though as it's a bit more of an expensive option.

>>2978054
no. you just have to only show your best work

>>2978054
>why would your mother lie to you

This. Actually none of my friends or family ever lied to me about my photos. When I started out "seriously" one of my friends told me they were pretty mediocre. Others told me some shots of mine were boring. These days I get a lot more praise from them but I don't think much of that and shoot for myself.

>>2978052
wow ur so smart and cool

>>2978071
>>2978073
>>2978075
>>2978078
these are totally pretty good for you're first time shooting
you'll only be able to afford a starter camera and kit lens but that's fine cause they take good photos
look into the nikon d3400 and similar cameras

have fun!