Did a test on my camera and you can, too! http://phototechm

File: Z100f_ACRman1_Step_2.png (54KB, 560x600px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 560x600px

>>2977449
supplementary info on imaging-resource

>>2977449
wrong y-axis label btw. its not log

File: IMG_3290.png (360KB, 1125x2001px) Image search: [Google]

360KB, 1125x2001px

How to read a curve

File: IMG_3291.jpg (107KB, 1125x1194px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 1125x1194px

Ektar 100

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Comment	Screenshot
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1125
Image Height	1194

File: IMG_3292.jpg (86KB, 929x984px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 929x984px

Portra 400

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Comment	Screenshot
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	929
Image Height	984

File: IMG_3293.jpg (162KB, 1079x677px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 1079x677px

>>2977456
Second paragraph. Whoops

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Comment	Screenshot
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1079
Image Height	677

>>2977449
>>/g/

>>2977449
>Did a test on my JPEG and you can, too!

I have yet to see a second camera with non-proportional response (first was Kodak DCR IIRC).

>>2977740
thats with raw files though