Didn't think I'd make this thread. But post some recent

File: 11111111.jpg (649KB, 5184x3456px) Image search: [Google]

649KB, 5184x3456px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS REBEL T5i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.6
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:23 18:52:41
Exposure Time	1/1600 sec
F-Number	f/6.3
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	3200
Lens Aperture	f/6.4
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	79.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	5184
Image Height	3456
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: 3333333333333333.jpg (308KB, 5184x3456px) Image search: [Google]

308KB, 5184x3456px

3/3

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS REBEL T5i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.4
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:23 18:55:06
Exposure Time	2.5 sec
F-Number	f/25.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/25.8
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	169.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	5184
Image Height	3456
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2970692
>>2970693
>>2970694
not bad. the flare on the first pic is kind of gross though. the flare on the second is oddly placed. the third one is just kind of dull and nothing stands out. it seems to have value as a /comfy/ pic but it doesn't provoke thought, just feels.

Maybe I'll drop some stuff myself.

File: IMG_5983 copy-2.jpg (464KB, 1000x667px) Image search: [Google]

464KB, 1000x667px

I'll give it a go. Just one for now.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS REBEL T5i
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.7 (Macintosh)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:01 21:59:27
Exposure Time	8 sec
F-Number	f/11.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/11.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	12.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2972033
not bad, yo
I don't like how the reflection appears in the puddle but that's not your fault

>>2972033
Nice

File: SAM_5779.jpg (1MB, 2720x1784px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2720x1784px

chemtrails in a Chicago skyline of three years past

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SAMSUNG
Camera Model	HMX-W200
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	33 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	96 dpi
Vertical Resolution	96 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:25 15:54:55
Exposure Time	1/19 sec
F-Number	f/2.2
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	50
Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	4.32 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2720
Image Height	1784
Exposure Index	1
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Digital Zoom Ratio	1.9
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: SAM_4893.jpg (1MB, 2380x1784px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2380x1784px

baby cousin
>captcha storefront: Babies R Us

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SAMSUNG
Camera Model	HMX-W200
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	33 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	96 dpi
Vertical Resolution	96 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:25 16:04:25
Exposure Time	1/7 sec
F-Number	f/2.2
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	4.32 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	2380
Image Height	1784
Exposure Index	1
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

File: SAM_5327.jpg (547KB, 1840x1380px) Image search: [Google]

547KB, 1840x1380px

a moth

that's all from me

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	SAMSUNG
Camera Model	HMX-W200
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	33 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	96 dpi
Vertical Resolution	96 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:25 16:08:06
Exposure Time	1/6 sec
F-Number	f/2.2
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	100
Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	4.32 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	1840
Image Height	1380
Exposure Index	1
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard
Contrast	Normal
Saturation	Normal
Sharpness	Normal

>>2972036
>>2972043
>>2972047
these are terrible and i hope bad things happen to you

>>2972076
I wouldn't doubt it. It's a years old point and shoot that's not even the most recent iteration of its model.

I'd like to hear your thoughts on what went wrong, beside the quality of the photographs (which I could do nothing about), for at least one of them.

>>2972079
They are just snapshits of NOTHING interesting. Taking a good photograph can happen by accident but its usually not the case.

>>2972080
alright then, I'll refrain from posting photos without interesting subject matter here from now on

>chemtrails aren't interesting
kind of bluepilled, m8

>>2972085
The literary subject of chemtrails, although fucking retarded is more interesting than a snapshit of some in the sky.

>>2972099
>fucking retarded
your pill is bluer than this board

>>2972030
i have to agree. i didn't like the flare myself but every time i tried to remove it, it ended up looking worse.

File: example.jpg (445KB, 891x493px) Image search: [Google]

445KB, 891x493px

>>2972033
I like it. But something seems off. I think perhaps its the sunset to be honest. You have this nice warm glow on the bottom half, then this sort of dead sky on top.

I for one actually like that the button shows the reflection of the tent. Although I think it would have been better if all the puddles were the same (puddle on right is of the sky, all others the tent, destroys balance).

the truck on the right too isn't very flattering.

i made a quick edit on Gimp. isn't amazing, but just a general sense of where im headed with my thoughts.

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS REBEL T5i
Camera Software	GIMP 2.8.14
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/5.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:25 21:00:49
Exposure Time	8 sec
F-Number	f/11.0
Exposure Program	Aperture Priority
ISO Speed Rating	400
Lens Aperture	f/11.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	12.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2972191
you got a little of a puddle on the bottom left

otherwise good crop

>>2972193
>good crop
>muh rule of turds

>>2972193
didn't even see that sucker, but yeah, you get the point.

>>2972197
does anyone actually consciously think about the rule of thirds? i mean, how fucking blind do you have to be to not naturally be able to tell if a photo is going to look good. i just don't get it.