Tried to photograph some buildings/architecture in London a few

File: London (3 of 3).jpg (4MB, 2340x3510px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2340x3510px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: London (1 of 3).jpg (3MB, 3510x2340px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3510x2340px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

Any pics of English qt feetsies?

>>2968434
simplypsycho?

>>2968434
ADMIN ADMIN ADMIN

>>2968405
This one is really nice

>>2968403
okay so this is a question of language. your photo directs the viewer to the sky (diagonal line from LL corner, light in UR, vanishing pint perspective) but there's nothing there. you didn't WANT to direct the viewer to the sky. so compose differently. I will also note that typically starting leading lines in the corner of a photo is too strong an effect and is typical of amateur work.
>>2968405
this is a photo of the gherkin. and some other badly framed crap in the bottom which it looks like you didn't have any use for -- you would've preferred that it just wasn't there. and a reflection without a visible source. the halo in the sky is effective, though. ultimately it's not transformative or technically impressive enough to be very interesting, unless it's your first time seeing the building.
>>2968406
you've got a pattern, great. but other than the reflections your light is crap. the sky looks like garbage. the boats are a dark mess. some of this might be fixed by framing. you probably should have panned down slightly to move the horizon up for better balance.

I wouldn't bother trying to process these, you need to get out and take lots more pictures to refine your composition skills. it takes time!

>>2968403
it's because modern london architecture is degenerate modern shit. it's impossible to take a good photo of something as shitty as london.

>>2968504
hey buddy i'm not op but you got me interested.
random quesiton
What book would you recommand, any one and as much as you want