Thread replies: 8
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: CEN_1259.jpg (524KB, 1000x662px) Image search:
[Google]
524KB, 1000x662px
I actually kinda like this. Will probably go back another night for a recompose when it doesn't rain as much and I have a tripod with me.
Sorry it's all I've got right now.
[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]
Camera-Specific Properties: Equipment Make NIKON CORPORATION Camera Model NIKON D7000 Camera Software Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.7 (Windows) Maximum Lens Aperture f/1.7 Sensing Method One-Chip Color Area Color Filter Array Pattern 762 Focal Length (35mm Equiv) 52 mm Image-Specific Properties: Horizontal Resolution 300 dpi Vertical Resolution 300 dpi Image Created 2016:11:16 21:26:30 Exposure Time 1/80 sec F-Number f/3.2 Exposure Program Manual ISO Speed Rating 400 Lens Aperture f/3.2 Exposure Bias 0 EV Metering Mode Center Weighted Average Light Source Unknown Flash No Flash, Compulsory Focal Length 35.00 mm Color Space Information sRGB Rendering Normal Exposure Mode Manual White Balance Auto Scene Capture Type Standard Gain Control Low Gain Up Contrast Normal Saturation Normal Sharpness Normal Subject Distance Range Unknown
>>
needs more depth of field, but even then, it's just a basic geometric pattern. this one photo hardly makes for a masterpiece. go shoot like, a hundred of these and make a set.
>>
>>2966150
Yeah man. Agreed. :) Wasn't meant to be either.
I think I may have found out what I like to take pictures of with this photo. For some reason it really strikes a cord with me.
I just kind of liked how the grime looked like trees coupled with the green color.
I know that probably sounds lame as shit but I think I know what I wanna shoot from now on.
Thanks for writing!
>>
Btw, when you say more depth of field, do you mean shallower, or broader? Higher f stop?
Sorry not native english so I'm not entirely sure what you mean.
>>
the green works with the tree patterns, but ould be better if it wasn't all the same shade of green
>>
>>2966157
broader. there is way too little in focus in this photo.
>>
>>2966159
The green was from some sort of lighting arrangement in the building.
I'm at my wits end as to what I could do about that?
>>
>>2966162
Yeah I get that.
I kinda liked how the focus was in the lower third. Don't know if I'm being obtuse put I felt it added some tension to the photo.
Will definetly go back and try some different things.
Again thanks guys, the feedback is much appreciated.
Thread posts: 8
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1