Can I get some cc? [EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

File: _MG_4017.jpg (135KB, 1500x824px) Image search: [Google]

135KB, 1500x824px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Canon
Camera Model	Canon EOS 7D
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.7 (Windows)
Photographer	Pinto
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2016:11:05 16:04:06
Exposure Time	8 sec
F-Number	f/4.0
Exposure Program	Manual
ISO Speed Rating	200
Lens Aperture	f/4.0
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Compulsory
Focal Length	23.00 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Rendering	Normal
Exposure Mode	Manual
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2959768
Image one establishes a mood for image two but you fucked it up with cropping/framing. Also ever heard of taking more shoots? Your cat is in the fucking way like a god damn ghost. Your f stop is at 4!? 8 second shutter? Iso 200!?

I dont know anything about that canon but if it can bring iso to 1600 or atleast 800 if it can. Throw tour cat out the fucking way. Make aperature super wide. And bring shutter to maybe 1/15? 1/30? No seconds! Your poor gf standing still!

Also tell her to not move shit so it can relate to image 1.

>>2959773

Oh they don't relate and thanks for the comments. I was trying to avoid graining but I guess it'd fit better?

My roommate was bring a lazy shit so he wasn't moving as it was

Pics aren't meant to compliment each other, just posted them together

>main point is the leading verticle lines
>not even straight and centered

>>2959774
Yay you took my criticism so nicely, great! Now that im not upset...

As a person who viewed these two. I felt they related and had a meaning with your roomate in frame. So your roomate was really not a problem. I honestly think they should relate because the second one feels so meaningless. If youre on film dont worry about graining. ISO 800 is fine. If youre using digital..... You should check your ISO performance.

File: 20151002_134140.jpg (544KB, 1000x563px) Image search: [Google]

544KB, 1000x563px

>>2959783

Yeah digital. It's a Canon 7d. Got it at a steal and honestly didn't know too much about it. I've done some landscape photography but wanted to start playing around with taking pictures of rooms.

I'm also taking other anons comments about framing and composition. Will use my tripod properly.

Would a wide angle, cropped properly, help?

Attached photo is from a trip to Colorado

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	samsung
Camera Model	SAMSUNG-SM-N915A
Camera Software	Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.2 (Windows)
Maximum Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	31 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	300 dpi
Vertical Resolution	300 dpi
Image Created	2015:10:06 09:31:59
Exposure Time	1/1800 sec
F-Number	f/2.2
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	40
Lens Aperture	f/2.2
Brightness	9.3 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Average
Light Source	Unknown
Flash	No Flash
Focal Length	4.80 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2959767
Yeah frame it better. Nice lighting but it being slightly off is really annoying

>>2959852

Thanks I'll try it again with better framing. Any other tips I may follow? Too much filters?

>>2959807
the sky is overdone in post processing, hurts my eyes, otherwise nice