How come we didn't have one of these? New Topographics are

File: _DSF8089.jpg (280KB, 531x800px) Image search: [Google]

280KB, 531x800px

>>2954813
Fuggggg. First time posting with 4chanX. Fucked up the title. Sorry lads

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: 345 (1 of 1)-9.jpg (653KB, 1200x798px) Image search: [Google]

653KB, 1200x798px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	200 dpi
Vertical Resolution	200 dpi

>>2954813
>shadows
>>2954828
>underexposure
>>2954829
>oversaturated, and there's a fucking person in it

Wow, congrats on finding the most mundane shit in the world to fail at and succeeding.

>>2954813
>How come we didn't have one of these?
Because New Topographics isn't a style, you fucktard. It was the name of a single exhibition in the 70's. Nobody in the art world uses that term to describe anything other than the original photos from those artists who were included in that wave.

These photos are just boring shots and complete shit. Even if you're trying emulate that style, you failed miserably. One of the key defining characteristics from the era was an insane attention to detail and technical precision, especially with exposure and color. You've failed entirely on both. Also, those photos carried an impeccable sense of balance in their composition, something that seems to have escaped you entirely.

Shitty photos of empty parking lots isn't some fancy style and certainly isn't "New Topographics." They're just shitty photos.

File: _DSF8097.jpg (323KB, 531x800px) Image search: [Google]

323KB, 531x800px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

>>2954832
>there's a fucking person in it
You would keep the person out to even enforce the impression of mundane shit, right? The problem is, the person is lost by doing nonsense in far distance

>>2954841

lol the salt

File: _DSF8100.jpg (320KB, 800x531px) Image search: [Google]

320KB, 800x531px

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB

File: BLACKHILLSINTRO.jpg (4MB, 2000x1600px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2000x1600px

>>2954841
I'm a fan of the show, and consider it to be a big shaping of my outlook and shooting intent. Do you or OP have any photographers who work currently who could be considered as working in this vein? I find Richard Mosse's Iraq work to be a descendant of New Topo.
As for a definition of the style I would describe it as straight photography in the modern landscape.

Picture is mine. Grainy as fuck.

File: _DSF8107.jpg (264KB, 800x531px) Image search: [Google]

264KB, 800x531px

>>2954975
Alexander Gronsky. you will dig his work for sure

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	240 dpi
Vertical Resolution	240 dpi
Color Space Information	sRGB