iPhone 6/7 fags only [EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

File: IMG_0098.jpg (4MB, 2734x3341px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2734x3341px

2

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Apple
Camera Model	iPhone 7
Camera Software	Snapseed 2.11.135096841
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:17 11:04:27
Exposure Time	1/220 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	20
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Brightness	7.3 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Flash	No Flash, Auto
Focal Length	3.99 mm
Image Width	2734
Image Height	3341
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: IMG_0049.jpg (4MB, 3024x4032px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 3024x4032px

3

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Apple
Camera Model	iPhone 7
Camera Software	10.0.2
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:15 18:10:32
Exposure Time	1/20 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	40
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Brightness	2.6 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Auto
Focal Length	3.99 mm
Image Width	3024
Image Height	4032
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: IMG_0055.jpg (1MB, 3024x4032px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3024x4032px

4

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Apple
Camera Model	iPhone 7
Camera Software	10.0.2
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:15 22:33:25
Exposure Time	1/17 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	50
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Brightness	2.2 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Flash	No Flash, Auto
Focal Length	3.99 mm
Image Width	3024
Image Height	4032
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

this looks like a 2002 compact camera.
Is this bait with edited exif?

>>2948792
Yeah lol you got me

oh sweet a containment board created for themselves

>>2948793
You mean these are genuine iphone photos?
I mean, is this what a lot of people is raging about?
The quality is comparable to a mediocre dated compact desu.

>>2948769
>>2948773
>Today I decided to take pictures of nothing

wow these fucking suck

>>2948801
>>2948802
>>2948799

Stop getting triggered because you can't afford a new phone and can't take better pictures.

File: IMG_0068.jpg (2MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4032x3024px

5

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Apple
Camera Model	iPhone 7
Camera Software	10.0.2
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:17 10:50:44
Exposure Time	1/643 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	20
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Brightness	8.8 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Auto
Focal Length	3.99 mm
Color Space Information	Uncalibrated
Image Width	4032
Image Height	3024
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2948814
Not ofence but i bet anons cam is expencier than the supid iphone 7

>>2948799
are you expecting a phone to include a dslr level camera?
Please stop being a retard and leave.

Can sombody post a picture with a other smartphone for comparison, because the quality looks realy shitty

>>2948816
Dude I have a dslr I know the quality is better, what are you expecting. I made this thread for just for iPhone camera.

Most of these anons are probably shit themselves and believe that the rule of thirds meme is the only way

>>2948816
Alright Shakespeare, lets see you take better photos :^)

>>2948823
I just remembered the puppeteer picture was taken with some digital zoom, that's why the quality sucks on that one.

and the earphone picture was taken in a dark room.

>>2948814
One can use a 50year old film camera with good film and produce better quality.

It's a phone, get over yourself.

>>2948829
The point of this thread is to take pictures from your phone not a 50 year old camera, or whatever.

all you did was talk pointless shit right there

>>2948819
Actually I'm just expecting image quality better than a dated compact solely because a lot of people is raging about iphone photography.

I must admit I never looked into it before, and after seeing some samples now I'm sort of disappointed, expected better.

>>2948835
Yeah I checked it myself it simply isn't true though, if you think this has the same quality as a old compact camera, it's simply not.

Btw I haven't edited these photos expect for some in phone adjusters

File: 2227003698_5217392b9c.jpg (150KB, 375x500px) Image search: [Google]

150KB, 375x500px

>>2948843
He is right

Compact cameras back than had much smaller picture sizes, so you couldn´t see how bad the image quality was.

File: IMG_0103.jpg (4MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 4032x3024px

Used snap seed on this

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Apple
Camera Model	iPhone 7
Camera Software	Snapseed 2.11.135096841
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:17 11:11:47
Exposure Time	1/1153 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	20
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Brightness	9.4 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Spot
Flash	No Flash, Auto
Focal Length	3.99 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4032
Image Height	3024
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2948834

are you trolling cause there are 2 retarded threads on front page about iphone photog faggotry with pics sized over 1000px on the longest side like why am i even??

File: plane shot.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x2448px

Not actually a photographer by any means but I have a couple of nice plane shots

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Apple
Camera Model	iPhone 5
Camera Software	Photos 1.0.1
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	33 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2015:07:13 11:18:04
Exposure Time	1/2088 sec
F-Number	f/2.4
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	50
Lens Aperture	f/2.4
Brightness	10.3 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Auto
Focal Length	4.12 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3264
Image Height	2448
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

File: plane shot2.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>2948897
nothing special

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Apple
Camera Model	iPhone 5
Camera Software	Photos 1.0.1
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	33 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Image Orientation	Top, Left-Hand
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2015:07:18 21:56:37
Exposure Time	1/433 sec
F-Number	f/2.4
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	50
Lens Aperture	f/2.4
Brightness	7.9 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Auto
Focal Length	4.12 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	3264
Image Height	2448
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2948896
Nash I only made this thread the other ones aren't mine, but yeah buy better internet and computer if you can't load pictures

>>2948897
>>2948898
iPhone 6/7 only fag

>IPhone shooters are trying to segregate themselves from eachother
>they think their hybrid tablets are any better than the shitty iPhone 4 at taking photos
Lol

>>2948773
Why would you photograph this

File: IMG_0097.jpg (4MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 4032x3024px

>>2948906
If you can't make the distinction between iPhone 4 photos and iPhone 7 photos have your eyesight checked and then kys

[EXIF data available. Click here to show/hide.]

Camera-Specific Properties:
Equipment Make	Apple
Camera Model	iPhone 7
Camera Software	Snapseed 2.11.135096841
Sensing Method	One-Chip Color Area
Focal Length (35mm Equiv)	28 mm
Image-Specific Properties:
Horizontal Resolution	72 dpi
Vertical Resolution	72 dpi
Image Created	2016:10:17 10:50:44
Exposure Time	1/643 sec
F-Number	f/1.8
Exposure Program	Normal Program
ISO Speed Rating	20
Lens Aperture	f/1.8
Brightness	8.8 EV
Exposure Bias	0 EV
Metering Mode	Pattern
Flash	No Flash, Auto
Focal Length	3.99 mm
Color Space Information	sRGB
Image Width	4032
Image Height	3024
Exposure Mode	Auto
White Balance	Auto
Scene Capture Type	Standard

>>2948909
Testing out lowlight conditions

>>2948910
>nobody likes my shitty photos that my 650$ 1/3" sensor camera takes! >:(

>>2948910
there are a lot of people from liverpool on /p/ it seems

>>2948815
Resize your shit Anon.
Also, terrible composition.

ITT: Hipsters posting their hipster snapshots

>>2949090
Try to give a reason rather than blurting things out

Plus I don't think any things wrong with the composition.

>>2948766
Hey OP, can you trip please?

>>2948766
Seattle really is a shitty place

>>2949160
This ain't Seattle dumbass, it's in the UK

>>2949156
Naah but I did dubs though

>>2949182
I forgot Seattle doesn't have a monopoly on them. Don't get your trust fund panties in a bunch, you dumbass. Your photo is shit and you are too.

>>2949186
Yeah right like I take baseless criticism from who randomly guessed guessed a location eventhOugh another anon already guessed right.
The only piece of shit here is you

>>2949090
Get a better computer we're in 2016 not 2001

>>2949209
Lurk more you newcunt

>>2949208
You took a photo of a street art hipster. You have no eye.

Shit my Moto X Pure and Z3 take better pictures.

>>2949214
how does taking a picture of street performer make you have "no eye", what constitutes a good photo is more based on the composition, the subject isn't all to important.

And I believe that the composition in my photographs is on a good level

>>2949328
you can take a good photo by manner of arragement, but if the subject isnt interesting then its a wasted picture. its like writing a grammatically perfect paper on that speck of dirt on the ground, but it's uninteresting.

>>2949222
Prove it

>>2949330
I have to disagree. photography is an art form, it gives you the ability to make uninteresting objects interesting. And the best photographs are who do that.

It's more like writing a poem about the speck of dirt.

>>2948772
>>2949330
Check this one I took, its probs my favourite, it's just a library book aisle. But t with the colours and the angle the photo was taken made it a lot more than just a book aisle. It has an intriguing feel to it.

>>2949331
Saying the iPhone 7 is appreciably better (most of the examples in this thread are appreciably worse) than those in the following examples is hilarious. Even the thumbnails look better than the iPhone's.
https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/motorola-moto-x-style-camera-review/6
http://pocketnow.com/2015/09/14/moto-x-pure-camera-samples
http://www.photographyblog.com/reviews/sony_xperia_z3_review/sample_images/

>>2949336
Yes, but theres more than just good composition, the subject is what the composition revolves around, and the subject is interesting as well; something you point out.

>>2948955
He took a photo inside the LJMU library and some at the Albert Dock with his new phone, 1st year student detected. Hopefully he'll drop out soon and go home.

>>2948766
Not getting HUAWEI P9

>>2949351
Really close but no cookie, I'm not a freshy. It's been 6 years since I bought a new phone. So yeah bought the iPhone 7 few days ago and realised that the best thing to do is shitpost in /p. Guess what it's fun.

Never really done serious photography the closest I got is when I used my bros Nikon D5300 for some shots.

Are you from Liverpool?

>>2949439
If you wanna buy a phone solely for its camera, get a Nokia lumia

File: [email protected] (74KB, 339x482px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 339x482px

>>2949451
Had to laugh at the poster in the library. Yes I'm from Liverpool and studied at John Moores. As you're not in your first year what do you think of the place? Have you ever ventured North of the James Parsons Building?

The camera on your new phone seems ok but you didn't come here for a critique of your photography did you.

>>2949482
Yeah i came just to shitpost really

But by north do you mean up the floors or actually north?

>>2949520
North as in points on the compass you nitwit.

>>2949527
Ash not really my apartments always been mostly south of it what's up there anyway?

>>2949550
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GoRPVsN2SVM

>>2949336
You fucking suck at photography.

>>2949333
This is by far the most shitty and worthless opinion I've ever come across.

>>2948865
cliche but I like

>>2949609
rather being a baseless-opinion-blurting retard try to give a reason behind your claims.

>>2949603
you probably such more though

>>2948769
I hate to tell you this, because you keep posting this pic so you seem proud of it, but it's shit.

>>2950472
I only posted this pic twice in a set

Calm your ass down